Relationships between Methane Production and Sulfate Reduction in Reclaimed Rice Field Soils

  • Lee, Ju-Hwan (Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University) ;
  • Cho, Kang-Hyun (Department of Biological Sciences, Inha University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

The change in relationships between methane production and sulfate reduction was investigated in reclaimed rice field soils at different time points after reclamation of tidal flat in Korea. Sulfate concentrations of soils in the ca. 60-year-old and 26-year-old reclaimed rice fields were much lower than that in a natural tidal flat. During 60 d of anaerobic incubation, total methane production and sulfate consumption of the soil slurries were 7.0 ${\mu}$mol $CH_4$/g and 8.2 ${\mu}$mol $SO_4^{2-}$/g in the 60-year-old rice field, 5.6 ${\mu}$mol $CH_4$/g and 12.7 mmol $SO_4^{2-}$/g in the 26-year-old rice field, and ca. 0 mmol $CH_4$/g and 22.4 ${\mu}$mol $SO_4^{2-}$/g in a natural tidal flat. Relative percent electron flow through sulfate reduction in the 60-year-old rice field was much lower (50.8%) compared with the 26-year-old rice field (69.3%) and the tidal flat (99.9%). The addition of an inhibitor of methanogenesis (2-bromoethanesulfonate) had no effect on sulfate reduction in the soil slurries of the reclaimed rice fields. However, instant stimulation of methane production was achieved with addition of an inhibitor of sulfate reduction (molybdate) in the soil slurries from the 26-year-old reclaimed rice field. The specific inhibitor experiments suggest that the relationship of methanogenesis and sulfate reduction might become mutually exclusive or syntrophic depending on sulfate content in the soil after reclamation. Sulfate, thus sulfate reduction activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria, would be an important environmental factor that inhibits methane production and determines the major pathway of electron and carbon flow in anaerobic carbon mineralization of reclaimed rice field soils.

Keywords

References

  1. Achtnich C, Schuhmann A, Wind A, and Conrad R (1995) Role of interspecies $H_2$ transfer to sulfate and ferric iron-reducing bacteria in acetate consumption in anoxic paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 16: 61-70 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00269.x
  2. Bak F and Pfennig N (1991) Microbial sulfate reduction in littoral sediment of Lake Constance. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 85: 31-42 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04695.x
  3. Boon PI and Mitchell A (1995) Methanogenesis in the sediments of an Australian freshwater wetland: comparison with aerobic decay, and factors controlling methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 18: 175-190 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1995.tb00175.x
  4. Capone DG and Kiene RP (1988) Comparison of microbial dynamics in marine and freshwater sediments: contrasts in anaerobic carbon catabolism. Limnol Oceanogr 33: 725-749 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1988.33.4_part_2.0725
  5. Chidthaisong A and Conrad R (2000) Specificity of chloroform, 2-bromoethanesulfonate and fluoroacetate to inhibit methanogenesis and other anaerobic processes in anoxic rice field soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 977-988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00006-7
  6. Conrad R (1996) Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases ($H_2$, CO, $CH_4$, OCS, $N_2O$, and NO). Microbiol Rev 60: 609-640
  7. Dalsgaard T and Bak F (1994) Nitrate reduction in a sulfate-reducing bacterium, Oesulfovibrio desulfuricans, isolated from rice paddy soil: sulfide inhibition, kinetics, and regulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 291-297
  8. Hafele S, Wopereis MCS, Boivin P, and N'Diaye AM (1999) Effect of puddling on soil desalinisation and rice seedling survival in the Senegal River Delta. Soil Till Res 51: 35-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00028-8
  9. Hendershot WH, Lalande H, and Duquette M (1993) Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis, Florida, pp 167-176
  10. Howarth RW and Giblin A (1983) Sulfate reduction in the salt marshes at Sapelo Island, Georgia. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 7082 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1983.28.1.0070
  11. Ingvorsen K and Brock TD (1982) Electron flow via sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in the anaerobic hypolimnion of Lake Mendota. Limnol Oceanogr 27: 559-564 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.3.0559
  12. Ingvorsen K, Zehnder AJB, and $J{\phi}rgensen$BB (1984) Kinetics of sulfate and acetate uptake by Oesulfobacter postgatei. Appl Environ Microbiol 47: 403-408
  13. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1995) Climate Change 1994: Radioactive Forcing of Climate Change and an Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  14. Isa Z, Grusenmeyer S, and Verstraete W (1986) Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: microbiological aspects. Appl Environ Microbiol 51: 580-587
  15. Iversen N and $J{\varphi}rgensen$ BB (1985) Anaerobic methane oxidation rates at the sulfate-methane transition in marine sediments from Kattegat and Skagerrak (Denmark). Limnol Oceanogr 30: 944-955 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1985.30.5.0944
  16. Jones JG, Simon BM, and Gardener S (1982) Factors affecting methanogenesis and associated anaerobic processes in the sediments of a stratified eutrophic lake. J General Microbiol 128: 1-11
  17. $J{\varphi}rgensen$ BB (1982) Mineralization of organic matter in the sea bed-the role of sulphate reduction. Nature 296: 643-645 https://doi.org/10.1038/296643a0
  18. Khalil MAK and Rasmussen A (1994) Global emissions of methane during the last several centuries. Chemosphere 29: 833-842 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(94)90156-2
  19. Lovely DR and Klug MJ (1983) Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 187-192
  20. McGill WB and Figueiredo CT (1993) Total nitrogen. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis, Florida, pp 201-211
  21. Oremland RS and Polcin S (1982) Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 44: 1270-1276
  22. Ranade DR, Dighe AS, Bhirangi SS, Panhalkar VS, and Yeole TY (1999) Evaluation of the use of sodium molybdate to inhibit sulphate reduction during anaerobic digestion of distillery waste. Bioresource Technol 68: 287-291 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00149-7
  23. Raskin L, Rittmann BE, and Stahl DA (1996) Competition and coexistence of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in anaerobic biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 3847-3857
  24. Roden EE and Wetzel RG (1996) Organic carbon oxidation and suppression of methane production by microbial Fe(III) oxide reduction in vegetated and unvegetated freshwater wetland sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 41: 1733-1748 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1733
  25. Rural Development Corporation (1996) Tideland Reclamation in Korea. Rural Development Corporation, Korea
  26. Scholten JCM, Conrad R, and Stams AJM (2000) Effect of 2-bromo-ethane sulfonate, molybdate and chloroform on acetate consumption by methanogenic and sulfate-reducing populations in freshwater sediment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32: 35-42 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00696.x
  27. Sheldrick BH and Wang C (1993) Particle size distribution. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis, Florida, pp 499-511
  28. Shin YK, Lee YS, Yun SH, and Park ME (1996) Methane emission measurement in rice paddy of Korea. In: Ping Q (ed), Environment and Biometeorology. The Proceedings of International Symposium on Environment and Biometeorology, China Agricultural Scientech Press, Beijing, pp 495-503
  29. Tran TS and Simard RR (1993) Mehlich III-extractable elements. In: Carter MR (ed), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis, Florida, pp 43-49
  30. United States Department Agriculture (USDA) (1954) Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline-alkali Soils, USDA Handbook No. 60
  31. Winfrey MR and Ward DM (1983) Substrates for sulfate reduction and methane production in intertidal sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 45: 193-199
  32. Winfrey MR and Zeikus JG (1977) Microbial methanogenesis in freshwater sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 33: 275-281
  33. Yao H, Conrad R, Wassmann R, and Neue HU (1999) Effect of soil characteristics on sequential reduction and methane production in sixteen rice paddy soils from China, the Philippines, and Italy. Biogeochemistry 47: 269-295 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992910