A Study on the Resources Analysis and Applicability for Green Tourism Development

녹색관광 자원유형분석 및 국내 적용가능성 연구

  • Yun Hee-Jeong (Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Im Seung-Bin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2004.10.01

Abstract

This study is aimed to define and classify GREEN TOURISM (GT) resources as the basis for rural sustainable development, and to analyze the current conditions of GT and applicable resources in Korea. For these purposes, a field survey about 24 rural villages in Japan and Korea is applied, accompanied by a questionnaire survey of 30 specialists, as well as a literature review. The results of this study are summarized as follows. The concept of GT has 3 important points: interchange between rural and urban residents, staying in villages, and residents' participation. GT resource are divided into 4 types: Agricultural, Ecological, Historical and Living resources in a space and activity program. In addition, the GT resources in Japan are more quantitatively abundant than in Korea, but Korean agricultural and ecological resources were more abundant relatively. According to the several methods above, 18 space and 14 activity programs were classified. Lastly, this study analyzed the applicable 32 Korean resources using the specialists' questionnaire survey. Among the space resources, ecological landscape, farm produce, farm-land, water, and historical landscape have higher applicability, but the applicability of sports, event, commemoration, and divine space are lower. Among the activity programs, farm produce, animal, plant, food&beverage, and living appliance have higher applicability.

Keywords

References

  1. 강원도 (2002) 강원도형 농촌관광 마을 가꾸기
  2. 강원도 농업기술원 (2001) 녹색관광 농촌 마을 모델
  3. 김범수, 이주희 (1997) 농산촌에 있어서 Green Tourism의 전개를 위한 농촌지역 주민과 도시민의 의식조사. 한국지역개발학회지 9(3): 183-199
  4. 김성기 (1997) 관광자원론. 서울: 기문사
  5. 김양자 (2000) 농촌관광 관련 용어에 관한 연구. 이화여대 錄友 논문집 39: 119-145
  6. 농림수산성 구조개선국 (2000) 그린투어리즘의 전개방향
  7. 박광순 (1999) 일본의 중산간 지역에서의 그린 투어리즘의 도입. 전개. 성과. 아시아태평양지역 연구 2(1): 135-163
  8. 산림청 (2001) 녹색관광과 산촌활성화
  9. 송미령 (2001) 농촌머을 관광모델과 주민참여방안. 여가와 농촌활성화 심포지엄
  10. 순창군 (2001) 순창군 그린투어리즘 육성지원조례
  11. 이후석 (1998) 교류형 관광농촌 모델개발에 관한 연구. 관광학연구 22(2): 153-161
  12. 이희승 (1982) 국어대사전. 서울: 민중서림
  13. 홍성권, 김성일 (2002) 녹색관광 참여의도에 관여하는 영향인자와 제한요소의 규명. 한국조경학회지 30(1): 18-28
  14. 宮崎猛(1999) グリ-ンツ-リズムと日本の農村-環境保全:=よる 村づくり-.農村統計協會
  15. 宮崎猛(2002) これからのグリ-ンツ-リスム. 家の光協會
  16. 多方一域 .田涮親華. 成氾廣莘(2001) グリ-ンツ-リズムの潮流 동경: 東海犬學出版會.
  17. 山崎光博. 小山善彦. 大島順子(1997) GreenTourism.강신겸. 김정연(역), 녹색관광, 서울: 일신사
  18. 財團法人 地域活性化七ンタ-(2002) ふるさと體驗 部市生活者 へのィタ-ネットフントフンケ-と調査結果
  19. Lew, A .(l998) Ecotourism Trends. Annals of Tourism Research 25(3): 742-746 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00023-1
  20. Marson, P. and J. Cheyne(2000) Residents' Attitudes to Proposed Tourism Development. Annals of Tourism research 27(2): 391-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00084-5
  21. Odum. E.(2001) Ecology & our endangered life-support systems. 이도원 외(역). 생태학. 서울: 사이언스 북스
  22. Orams. M .B.(l995), Towards a more Desirable Form of Ecotourism Tourism Management 16(1): 3-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(94)00001-Q
  23. Ross. S. and G. WaII(l999) Ecotourism: Toward Congruence between Theory and Practice. Tourism Management 20(1): 123-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00098-3