Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

The Effects of Scripted Cooperative Learning in Elementary School Science Instruction

초등학교 과학 수업에서 대본을 사용한 협동학습의 효과

  • Published : 2004.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the effects of scripted cooperative learning in elementary school science instruction were investigated. Three classes (95 sixth graders) were divided into three groups, including a traditional learning group, a cooperative learning group and a scripted cooperative learning group respectively. Students were taught about 'several kinds of gas' for nine class periods. After instruction, the effects upon student's achievement, science learning motivation, and attitude toward science instruction were examined. ANCOVA results indicated that there was a significant interaction effect between the treatment and achievement level in the achievement test scores. The achievement test scores of the low level students were significantly higher in the scripted cooperative learning group than those in the other groups. The science learning motivation and the attitude toward science instruction scores were also significantly higher among students in the scripted cooperative learning group.

이 연구는 초등학교 과학 수업에 대본을 사용한 협동학습의 적용하여 그 효과를 조사하였다. 6학년 3개 학급 95명을 대상으로 '여러 가지 기체' 단원 총 9차시에 대하여 전통수업, 협동수업, 대본을 사용한 협동수업을 실시한 후, 학업 성취도, 과학 학습 동기, 과학 수업에 대한 태도를 비교하였다. 이원 공변량 분석 결과, 학업 성취도에서 수업 처치와 성취 수준 사이에 유의미한 상호작용 효과가 나타났다. 성취 수준 하위 학생들의 학업 성취도 점수는 대본을 사용한 협동학습 집단이 다른 집단보다 유의미하게 높았다. 또한 과학 학습 동기와 과학 수업에 대한 태도 점수도 대본을 사용한 협동학습 집단이 유의미하게 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김현재(1999). 과학과 열린교육. 서울: 교육과학사
  2. 박분희(1995). 구조화 협력학습전략과 보상이 독해학습에 미치는 효과. 서울여자대학교 박사 학위 논문
  3. 박종욱, 김수현, 임희준, 노태희(1997). 초등학교 자연 수업에서 협동학습 전략의 교수 효과. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 16(2), 227-290
  4. 이종두(1997). 구조화된 협동학습 전략과 집단보상 제공이 학업성취에 미치는 효과. 서울대학교 석사 학위 논문
  5. 임희준, 박수연, 노태희(1998). 초등학교 자연 수업에서 학생 중심의 활동올 강조한 협동학습의 교수 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(2), 201-208
  6. 정문성 (2002). 협동 학습의 이해와 실천. 서울: 교육과학사
  7. 정명화(1992). 협동학습전략이 산문과제학습에 미치는 효과. 부산대학교 박사 학위 논문
  8. 한영욱, 박수경, 김대흥(2000). 협동기술 훈련이 초등학생의 과학학습에 미치는 효과. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 19(1), 29-40
  9. Berg, K. F.(1994). Scripted cooperation in high school mathematics: Peer interaction and achievement. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana, April, ED 374976
  10. Chang, H. P. & Lederman, N. G.(1994). The effects of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups in physical science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 167-181 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310207
  11. Dansereau, D. F.(1985). Learning strategy research. In J. W. Segal, S. F. Chipman, & R Glaser (Ed.) Thinking and learning skilIs. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 209-240
  12. Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R(1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.331
  13. Fraser, B. J.(1981). Test of science-related attitudes: Handbook. Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research
  14. Hythecker, V. I., Dansereau, D. F., & Rocklin, T. R(1988). An analysis of the processes influencing the structured dyadic learning environment. Educational Psychologist, 23(1), 23-38 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2301_2
  15. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R T.(1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company
  16. Johnson, R T. & Johnson, D. W.(1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  17. Kagan, S.(1986). Cooperative learning resourees for teachers. San Juan Capristrano. CA: resources for teachers
  18. Keller, J. M. & Subhiyah, R.(1993). Course interest survey. Florida State University
  19. Meloth, M. S. & Deering, P. D.(1992). Effects of two cooperative conditions on peer-group discussions, reading comprehension and metacognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(3), 175-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90057-6
  20. Newbern, D., Dansereau, D. F., Patterson. M. E., & Wallace, D. S.(1994). Toward a science of cooperation. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April 4-8, ED 367713
  21. O' Donnell, A M., Dansereau, D. F., Hall, R H., & Rocklin, T. R.(1987). Cognitive, social affective and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 431-437 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.431
  22. O' Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., Rocklin, T. R, Lambiotte, J. G., Hythecker, V. I., Larson, C. O., Young, M. D.(1985). Effects of elaboration frequency on cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 572-580 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.5.572
  23. Rewey, K. L., Dansereau, D. F., Skaggs, L., Hall, R H., & Pitre, U.(1989). Effects of scripted cooperation and knowledge maps on the processing of technical material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 604-609 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.604
  24. Ross, J. A, & Raphael, D.(1990). Communication and problem solving achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Cuniculum Studies, 22(2), 149-164 https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027900220204
  25. Vermette, P. J.(1998). Making cooperative learning work: Student teams in K-12 classrooms. NJ: Prentice-Hall. 161-163
  26. Webb, N. M.(1985). Student interaction and learning in small groups: A research summary. In R Slavin, S. Sharan, S, Kagan, R, Herlz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds,) Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn. NY: Plenum Press. 147-172