Developing Active Role of Science Museum in Educating on Ethical Issues on Science and Technology: Four Case Studies

  • Published : 2004.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine a) each of the selected science museums for its role in educating on ethical issues in science and technology, b) what are the most frequently dealt ethical themes in science and technology; c) how were those themes presented (via exhibition, play, panel, movies, etc); and d) identify common characteristics in the selected science museums' presentations of ethical issues. The results indicated that selected museums present ethical issues related to technology development, mainly on biotechnology and environmental issues. The type of presentations dealing with ethical issues most frequently were exhibitions, panels and simulations, followed by demonstrations and lectures. All of the selected museums had common characteristics for actively taking an educational role in ethical issues in science. The study suggests that efforts to communicate the ethical issues in various areas should be reinforced to educate students and the public, and that it may be the museum's role to expose ethical aspects of technology related to human rights, dignity, health and development issues from the early stage of its development.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. The author, Washington, D.C.
  2. American Association of Museums(AAM) (1984). Museums for a new century. The author, Washington, D.C.
  3. Anonymous(1998). An NSTA position statement: Informal science education. The Science Teacher, 65(5), 54-55
  4. Cho, H., & Choi, K. (1998). The necessities and current states of science education dealing with ethical characteristics of science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 18(4), 559-570
  5. Choi, K., & Cho, H. (2001). Effects of teaching ethical issues on Korean school students' attitudes towards science. Journal of Biological Education, 37(1), 26-30
  6. Falk, J. H. (1998). Toward a better understanding of why people go to museums. Museum news, 77(2), 38-43
  7. Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The Museum Experience. Whalesback Books, Washington, D.C.
  8. Henriksen, E. K. & Freland, M. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 393-415 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/304
  9. Levidow, L. (1998). Domesticating biotechnology: how London's science museum has framed the controversy. The Ecologist, 28(3), 143-145
  10. Maxwell, N. (1984). From knowledge to wisdom: A revolution in the aims and methods of science. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
  11. National Research Council (NRC) (1995). National Science Education Standards. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  12. Newton, D. P. (1988). Making science education relevant. Kagan Page, London
  13. Norwegian Ministry of Cultural Affairs(1996). Museum. The author, Oslo. cited from E. K. Henriksen, & M. Froland. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science. 9(4), 393-415 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/304
  14. Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision Making And STS Education: Exploring Scientific Knowledge And Social Responsibility In Schools And Science Centers Through An Issues-Based Approach. School Science & Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17471.x
  15. Reiser, S. J., & Bulger, R. E. (1997). The social responsibility of biological scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 137-143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0004-8
  16. Ruggiero, C. (2000). Spreading the analytical word. Chemistry & Industry, 5, 182-184
  17. Song, J., Oh, W., Cho, S., & Koo, S. (2002). A Survey and Developing DB System for the Facilities Supporting Students' Out-of-school Science Activities in Korea. Korea Science Foundation, Korea
  18. Swedish Ministry of Cultural Affairs (1994). Minne och Bildning. Museernas Uppdrag och Organisation. The author, Stockholm. cited from E. K. Henriksen, and M. Froland. (2000). The contribution of museums to scientific literacy: views from audience and museum professionals. Public Understanding of Science, 9(4), 393-415 https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/4/304
  19. Wakeford, T., & Walters, M. (Eds.) (1995). Science for the Earth : Can science make the world a better place? Wiley, Chichester, UK
  20. Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and informal learning in science: the role of the interactive science centres. Physics Education, 25, 247-252 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/25/5/307
  21. Wellington, J.(1994). Using informal learning to enrich science education. In J. Wellington, J. Henderson, V. Lally, J. Scaife, S. Knutton & M. Nott(Eds.), Secondary Science: contemporary issues and practical approaches. Routledge, London & New York. 284-294