A Study on the History of Princess Fashion and Its Socio-Cultural Implications -Focused on the Feminist's Viewpoint-

공주패션의 역사와 사회문화적 고찰 - 페미니스트 관점에서 -

  • Kim, Sung-Bok (Dept. of Fashion & Business, Hansung University)
  • 김성복 (한성대학교 의류패션산업전공)
  • Received : 2004.10.02
  • Published : 2004.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to speculate on the history and the meaning of so-called "princess fashion" based on the feminist's viewpoint. While many designers in Korean fashion world have fostered the trend of princess fashion, relatively little insight has been developed regarding its socio-cultural meanings. For this problem, the researcher traced the historical background and the development of the princess fashion in both the western and the Korean fashion world. As a case of the princess fashion study, Andre Kim(a renowned Korean designer)'s collection was selected and analyzed since he has often been a central figure for the princess fashion trends in Korea. Here the operational definition of the princess fashion is the lavish dresses designed based on the western court dress styles. As a result, the researcher found that the princess fashion was originated from the eighteenth century in France. In the nineteenth century, male designers took over the role to make extravagant dresses such as empire and crinoline dresses which became the prototypes for the princess fashion. In Korea, the western court dress style was introduced at the end of the nineteenth century and it became a uniform of prostitutes during the Korean War. By analyzing Andre Kim's collection, it is found that his romantic dresses imitated the nineteenth century court dresses. Therefore, from the feminist's viewpoint, his princess fashion is a mere reproduction of anachronistic styles reflecting inferior and passive images of women. The researcher draws a conclusion that today's fashion should transcend the princess fashion that signifies the female's submissive-masochistic roles operated by the male's sexual expectation.

Keywords

References

  1. 경향신문 (1999) '고급옷' 거품빼는 '한국의 샤넬'. 9, 6
  2. 앙드레김 스페셜 컬렉션 (1999) KBS, 6. 2
  3. 유수경 (1990) '한국 여성 양장 변천사'. 일지사, 서울, pp.130-131
  4. 정홍숙 (1982) '복식문화사'. 교문사, 서울, p.191, pp.256-257
  5. 최영 . 박정오 . 최경호 . 이희원 (1997) '푸코와 페미니즘'. 동문선, 서울, pp.214-215
  6. 홍수원 (1988) '신데렐라 콤플렉스'. 우아당, 서울, p.31
  7. Brogden, J. (1971) 'Fashion Design'. Studio Vista, London, pp.8-13
  8. Cosgrave, B. (2000) 'The Complete History of Costume & Fashion'. Checkmark Books, New York, p.173,168,188,199
  9. De La Hay, A. (1988) 'Fashion Source Book'. Wellfleet Press, New Jersey, p.8.
  10. Greenwood, K.M. and Murphy M.F. (1978) 'Fashion Innovation and Marketing'. Macmillan Publishers, New York, p.84
  11. Haynes, M.T. (1998) 'Dressing up Debutantes'. Berg, New York, pp. 52-53
  12. Hollander, A. (1994) 'Sex and Suits: The Evolution of Modern Dress'. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, pp.116-126
  13. Picken, M.B. and Miller D.L. (1956) 'Dressmakers of France'. Harpers & Brothers, New York, p.33, pp.24-29
  14. Roberts, H.E. (1977) The exquisite slaves: The role of clothes in the making of the victorian woman. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 2(3), 554-569 https://doi.org/10.1086/493387
  15. Rossi, A. (1988) 'The Feminist Papers'. Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp.55-57
  16. Tortora, P. and Eubank, K. (1994) 'Survey of Historical Costume'. Fairchild Publications, New York, pp.298-299