The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

THE STUDY OF FLEXURAL STRENGTH OF VARIOUS ZIRCONIA CERAMICS

수종 지르코니아 세라믹의 굴곡강도에 관한 연구

  • Park Jae-Hong (Department of Prothodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Hwang Jung-Won (Department of Prothodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Shin Sang-Wan (Department of Prothodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • 박재홍 (고려대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 황정원 (고려대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Published : 2004.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Increasing demand of esthetic restorations made lots of kinds of ceramic materials. Among them, zirconia has been being focused by many dentists. But, mechanical properties of zirconia were still unclear. Purpose : The purposes of this study were to analyze the flexural strength of various zirconia ceramics which had been currently used for clinic i.e., In-Ceram Zirconia(Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad $S\"{a}ckingen$, Germany), Celay Zirconia(Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad $S\"{a}ckingen$, Germany) and CAD/CAM Zirconia (Adens Zi-Ceram. Seoul , Korea). Material and methods: The four point bending test(ASTM Cl161) was used to measure the flexural strength of a specimen before and after circular heat treatment and fatigue loading. Results : 1. The average value of flexural strengths of CAD/CAM Zirconia, Celay Zirconia, In-Ceram Zirconia in dry condition were 806.5 MPa, 669.9 MPa, 605.6 MPa, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in strength among the types (P<0.05). 2. After thermocycling, the average flexural strengths of CAD/CAM Zirconia, Celay Zirconia, In-Ceram Zirconia were 791.2 MPa, 604.2 MPa, 605.4 MPa, respectively. CAD/CAM Zirconia showed statistically significant higher strength(P<0.05). The others showed no significant difference after thermocycling(P>0.05). 3. After fatigue loading in wet condition. the average flexural strengths of CAD/CAM Zirconia, Celay Zirconia, In-Ceram Zirconia were 806.0 MPa, 674.9 MPa, 601.7 MPa, respectively. There was a significant difference in strength among the types(P<0.05). 4. There was no statistically significant difference in strength of the specimens according to experimental methods except for before and after thermocycling in Celay Zirconia(P>0.05). Conclusion: Besides high esthetic quality, zirconia had sufficiently high mechanical strength.

Keywords

References

  1. Shimizu K. Oka M. Kumar P. Kotoura Y. Yamamuro T, Makinouchi K. et al : Timedependent changes in the mechanical properties of zirconia ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res 1993 :27: 729-34
  2. Luthardt RG. Holzhuter M. Sandkuhl O. Herold V. Schnapp JD, Kuhlisch E. et al : Reliability and properties of ground Y-TZP -zITconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2002:81:487-91
  3. Christel P. Meunier A Heller M. Torre JP, Peille CN : Mechanical properties and shortterm in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide -partially-stabiliwed zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res 1989:23:45-61
  4. Tinschert J. Natt G. Mautsch W. Spiekermarm H. Anusavice KJ : Marginal fit of aluminaand zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001:26:367-74
  5. Kosmac T. Oblak C. Jevnikar P. Funduk N. Marion L : The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999: 15 :426-33
  6. Piconi C, Maccauro G : Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. A Review Biomaterials 1999 Jan:20:1-25
  7. Willamnn G. Fruh HJ. Pfaff HG : Wear characteristics of sliding pairs of zirconia (Y-TZP) for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials 1996: 17:2157-62
  8. Meyenberg KH. Luthy H. Scharer P : Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995:7:73-80
  9. Paul S. Scharer P : Resin-bonded structures for full ceramic crowns. Resin-bonded structural fillings with/without a dowel anchorage for full-ceramic anterior tooth crowns. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1996: 106: 368-77
  10. Luthardt R. Weber A Rudolph H. Schone C. Quaas S. Walter M : Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002:5:165-76
  11. McLean JW. Jeansonne EE. Chiche GJ. Pinault A : All ceramic crowns and foil crowns. In: Chiche GJ. Pinault A (eds). Esthetics of Anterior Fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago. Quintessence 1994:12:97-113
  12. Wagner WC. Chu TM : Biaxial flexural strength and indentation fracture toughness of three new dental core ceramics J Prosthet Dent, 1996: 76: 140-4
  13. Wohlwend A, Studer S, Scharer P : The zir-conium oxide abutment : an all-ceramic abutment for the esthetic improvement of implant superstructures. Quintessence Dent TechnoI 1997:1:63-74
  14. Keith O, Kusy RP, Whitley JQ : Zirconia brackets. an evaluation of morphology and coefficients of fricition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994: 106: 605-14
  15. Tinschert J, Zwez D, Marx R, Anusavice KJ : Structural reliability of alumina-. feldspar. leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. J Dent 2000:28:529-35
  16. Designation: C 1161-02b. Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature
  17. Nikaido T. Kunzelmann KH. Chen H. Ogata M. Harada N, Yamaguchi S. et al : Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dental Materials 2002:18:269-75
  18. Ohyama T, Yoshinari M. Oda Y : Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1999:12:28-37
  19. MS Song. SS Cho : Statistical analysis by SAS. Freedom Academy. 93p.
  20. Land CH : A new system of restoring badly decayed teeth by means of an enameled metallic coating. Independent Pratitioner. 1986: 7:407
  21. Bindl A, Mormann WH : An up to 5-year clin-ical evaluation of posterior In--ceram CAD/CAM core crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2002: 15:451-6
  22. Giordano R 2nd : A comparison of allceramic restorative systems: Part 2. Gen Dent 2000:48:38-40. 43-5
  23. Heinrich F, Kappert D, Knode H : In-Coram: Testing a new ceramic material. Quintessence Dent TechoI 1993:87-96
  24. Craig RG : Restorative dental materials. St. Louis. Mosby. 1989, p.65
  25. Shand EB : Glass Engineering Handbook 2nd ed, New York. 1958, pp.50-51
  26. Mould RE : The strength and Static Fatigue of Glass, Glastech Ber 32K 1959: 18-28
  27. Jones DW : The Strength and Strengthening Mechanisms of Dental Ceramics: In: Dental Ceramics. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Ceramics. J. W. Mclean, Chicago, Quintessence Publ Co 1983, pp.96-8,110-6
  28. Hillig WE. Charles RJ : Surfaces, Stress-dependent Surface Reactions, and Strength. In: High Strength Materials, V.F. Zackay, New York. Wiley 1965. pp.682-701
  29. Michalske TA, Freiman SW : A Molecular Mechanism for Stress Corrosion in Vitreous Silica. J Am Ceram Soc 1983:66:284-8
  30. Nelson RJ, Wolcott RB, Paffenbarger GC : Fluid exchange at the margin of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1952:44:288-95
  31. Peterson EA, Philips RW, Swartz ML : A comparison of physical properties of four restorative resins. J Am Dent assoc 1966:73:1324-36
  32. Palmer DS. Barco MT, Billy EJ : Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J prosthet Dent 1992:67:325-7
  33. Michalesco PM, Grieve AR, Abadie MJM : An in vivo recording of variations in oral temperature during meals. J Prosthet Dent 1995:214-8
  34. Noguchi H. Nakamurak K. AkamaY. Kakuchi T : Endurance of adhesive strength of dental adhesives. J Jpn Dent Mater 1986:5:660-5
  35. Wendt SL. McInnes PM. Dickinson GL : The effectof thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992:8:181-4
  36. Retief DH, O' Brien JA. Smith LA. Merchman JL : In vitro investigation and evaluation of dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1988:1:176-83
  37. Munksgaard EC. Itoh K. Jorgensen KD : Dentin polymer bond in resin fillings tested in vitro by thermo-and load-cycling. J Dent Res 1985:64:144-6
  38. Mandras RS. Retief DH, Russell CM : The effects of thermal and occlusal stresses on the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater 1991:7:63-7
  39. Darbyshire PA Messer LB. Douglas WH : Microleakage in class illcomposite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling. J Dent Res 1988:67: 585-7
  40. Moore DH, Vann WF : The effect of a cavosurface bevel on microleakage in posterior composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1988:59:21-4
  41. Bullard RH. Leinfelder KF. Russel CM : Effect of cofficient of thermal expansion on microleakeage. J Am Dent Asso 1988:116:871-4
  42. Welsh EL. Hembree JH : Microleakage at the gingival wall with four class V anterior restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:370-2
  43. Fayyard MA. Shortall AC : Microleakage of dentin-bonded composite restorations. J Dent 1987:15:67-72
  44. Fuks AB. Herschfield Z. Grajower R : Marginal leakage of cervical resin restorations with a bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1985:54:654-7
  45. Momi Y. Iwase Y. Nakano Y. Kohno A, Asanuma A, YanagisawaA : Gradual increases in marginal leakage of resin composite restorations with thermal stress. J dent Res 1990;69: 1659-63
  46. Staninec M. Mochizuki A Tanizaki K. Fukuda K. Tsuchitans Y : Interfacial space. marginal leakage. and enamel cracks around composite resins. Oper Dent 1986:11:14-24
  47. Wachtman JB : Mechanical Properties of Ceramics. Wiley Interscience 1996
  48. Nakazato T. Takahashi H. Yamamoto M. Nishimura F. Kurosaki N : Effect of polishing on cyclic fatigue strength of CAD/CAM ceramics. Dent Mater J 1999 :18:395-402
  49. Morena R. Beaudreau GM. Lockwood PE. Evans AL. Fairhurst CW : Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986:65:993-7
  50. Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE. Ringle RD. Twiggs SW : Dynamic fatigue of feldspathic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993:9:269-73
  51. Kelly JR : Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81 :652-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
  52. Sobrinho LC. Cattell MJ. Glover RH. Knowles JC : Investigation of the dry and wet fatigue properties of three all-ceramiccrown systems. Int J Prosthodont 1998: 11:255-62
  53. Southan DE; Jorgensen KD : The Endurance Limit of Dental Porcelain. Aust Dent J 1974; 19:7-11 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1974.tb05012.x