Ingenium (인재니움)

Korean Society for Engineering Education (한국공학교육학회)
권호 표지

공학 전공과목의 영어 강의에 관한 연구

  • 강소연 (연세대학교 공학교육혁신센터)
  • Published : 2004.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Burge, S., Wesche, M, and Migneron, M. (1997), 'Late, lateimmersion': Discipline-based second language teaching at the University of Ottawa. In R. Johnson and M. Swain (eds.).l, Immersion education: International perspectives(pp. 65-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  2. Colliers, V.P. (1989). How long? Asynthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), 509-531
  3. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters
  4. Gass, S. (1999). Discussion: incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 319-333
  5. Grabe, W. and Stoller, F. (1997). Content-based instruction: Research foundations. In M. Snow and D. Brinton (eda), Content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 5-21). New York: Longman
  6. Klaassen, R. G. and De Graaff, E. (2001). Facing innovation: preparing lectures for English-medium instruction in a non-native context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(3), 281-289
  7. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press
  8. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York.Longman
  9. Morrison, Keith and Lui, ley (2000). Ideology, linguistic capital and the medium of instruction in Hong Kong. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(6), 471-486
  10. Paribakht, T. & Weche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp,174-200). Cambridge.Cambridge University Press
  11. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  12. Pica, T. (2002). Subject-matter content: how does it assist theinteractional and linguistic needs ofclassroom language learners? Modem Language Journal, 86(1), 1-19
  13. Prophet, B. and Dow, P. (1994). Mother tongue language and concept development in science: ABotswana case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 7(3), 205-216
  14. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. InS. Gass and C. Madden (eds.) Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: ewbury House
  15. Swain, M. (1988). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6(1), 68-83
  16. Vinke, D. (1995). English as the medium of instruction in Dutch engineering education. Delft University Press