Growth and Yield of Rice by Field Water Management for Water-Saving Irrigation

물절약형 담수심 관리방법에 따른 벼 생육 및 수량

  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

To reduce water input by water-saving irrigation techniques a field study was carried out with three water managements, very shallow intermittent irrigation (VSII, 2cm), shallow intermittent irrigation (SII, 4cm) and traditional deep water irrigation (DWI, 10cm) for two years. Rice growth and grain yields of three water managements were not significantly different. However, when the water irrigation depth was decreased, the breaking and lodging resistance were increased and the roots were widely distributed into deeper paddy soil. More numbers of both annual and perennial weeds were occurred in VSII than in DWI at maximum heading stage and only the number of perennial weeds was three times in VSII than in DWI at heading stage. The total water inputs were 777, 654 and 527 mm in DWI, SII and VSII, therefore the water-saving rates of VSII and SII were $32.2\%\;and\;15.9\%$ compared to typical deep water irrigation. The water-productivity (Rice yield to water input) was highest in VSII as 0.94 and followed by SII as 0.76 and DWI as 0.63. In the face of water scarcity, it is very important to find or develope water saving irrigation system and find ways to increase the productivity of water used for rice cultivation.

효율적인 물 관리방식 개발의 기초 자료를 얻고자 논의 물 관리 차이가 벼의 생육과 수확량에 미치는 영향을 2002년부터 2003년까지 조사한 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 물 관리 방법별 벼 생육 및 수량은 DWI는 VSII에 비해 출수기의 초장이 길었고, 경수가 적었으나 유효경 비율은 약간 높았고, VSII의 등숙비율은 다른 물 관리에 비해 $1\%$ 낮아 쌀 수량은 $2.1\%$ 적었으나 통계적 유의성은 없었다. 2. 관개량과 유효강우량 등 총 물 공급량은 DWI에서 777.2mm로 가장 많았고, VS팀에서 527mm로 가장 적어, SII에서는 DWI에 비해 약 $15.9\%$, VSII에서는 $32.2\%$정도의 물 절약효과가 있었다. 3. 절간장은 N3, N4절은 관수심이 깊을수록 길었으며, 간벽두께, 간기중, 줄기직경은 DWI에서 감소하였으나, 좌절중, Pushing resistance는 VSII가 DWI에 비해 매우 높고 도복지수가 낮았다. 4. VSII의 성숙기 근장은 27cm로 DWI보다 깊게 내려갔으며, 토양 표면으로부터 10cm이상 깊이에서는 VSII의 뿌리 발생량이 많았으나, 토양 표면으로부터 10cm까지는 DWI의 뿌리분포가 많았다. 5. 물 관리 차이에 따른 잡초 발생양상은 최고 분얼기에는 VSII가 DWI에 비해 일년생 잡초와 다년생 잡초 모두 본수가 2배 이상 많았으며, 출수기에는 일년생 잡초 본수는 물 관리 차이에 관계없이 비슷하였으나, 다년생 잡초 본수는 VSII에서 DWI에 비해 3배 이상 많았다. 이상의 결과에서 담수심을 얕게 하여 용수를 절약하여도 관행 심수 관개 방식에 비해 벼 생육 및 수량에는 차이가 없었고, 오히려 내도복성을 향상시킬 수 있었으므로 최적 용수 공급량 산출의 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Borell, A., A. Garside, and S. Fukai, 1997 Improving efficiency of water for irrigated rice In a semi-arid tropical environment. FIeld Crop Res 52 231-248 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00033-6
  2. Bouman, B A. M 2001 Water-efficient management strategies on rice production Intermational Rice Research Notes 162 17-22
  3. Cheong, B H 2003 Recent status of water resources and Its prospect and efficient useof agricultural water resources In Korea. Interma-tional symposiun on enhancement of water use efficiency In low-land rice cultivation. Iksan Korea NHAES pp. 19-38
  4. Kawashima, C. and T. Murakami 1985 An example of growth and yield of rice plant growth In deeply-submerged paddy field Tohoku Br Crop SCI Soc Japan 28 3-35
  5. 崔旻圭, 金尚洙, 李善龙, 崔善英 1995 벼 乾沓直播 栽培時 中間落水가 生育 및 倒伏에 미치는 影響, 韩國作物學會誌 40(5). 574-579
  6. Gupta, R K, R K Naresh, P R Hobbs, and J K Ladha 2002 Adoptmg conservation agnculture In the nee-wheat system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. new opportunties for saving water Waterwise nee production. Los Banos/Phihppmes) International RIce Research InstItute. pp 207-222
  7. 慶尚北道 2002 2002 물관리백서. pp 47-57
  8. 富士崗義一 1956 適期水灌適 と 用水量の節水可能 農土硏 24(1) : 37
  9. 川田信一郎, 片野學 1977. 水稻における根群形成について, とくに 湿田, 乾畓に著目した場合の一例. 日作记 46 261-268
  10. 具滋玉, 任日彬 1992 直播栽培로의 樣式 轉换에 따른 논 雜草問 題의 變化. 韩國作物學會誌 12(3). 223-229
  11. 具然忠, 吳潤鎭, 李鐘薫 1982. 湛水深에 따른 논 雜草發生態와 除草劑 效果에 미치는 影響 韩國作物學會誌 2. 47-52
  12. 金吉雄, 安寿奉. 1975 除草剂에 對한 水稻 品種間 反應 1 水深및 温度處理가 除草剂의 作用에 미치는 影饗 韩國杂草学会志 20. 148-151
  13. 李昌九, 金哲會 1996. 水稻作의 節水栽培에 關한 研究 韩國作物學會誌 3 11-16
  14. 大江直道, 星川清親, 後藤雄佐 1991 段階呁深水處理ガ分げつ期の 水稻の生長こ及ぼ影饗 日作記 60(别 1號). 23-24
  15. 朴成泰, James E HIll, 张安徹, 李壽寬 1993 差異가 벼 品種과 피의 初期生育에 미치는影饗 韩國作物学会志 38(5)405-41
  16. 劉漌烈, 李昌九 1970 輪換灌漑方法과 滴正施設研究 農工學會誌 12(2) 15
  17. 佐藤康 1952 野生稗に關する硏究漑觀 農及園 26(10) 1047-1050
  18. Tabbal, D. F., B. A. M. Bouman, S. I Bhutyan, E. B Sibayan, and M. A. Sattar 2002 On-farm strategies for reducmg water input I im-gated nce, case studies in the Phihppmes Agric. Water Manage 56 93-112 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00007-0
  19. Teraslurna, K., S Akita, and N Sakai 1992 Eco-physiologrcal char-actenstics related with lodging tolerance of nee in direct sowing cultrvation I Comparison of the root lodging tolerance among cul-tivars by the measurement of pushing resistance Japan J Crop Sci 61(3) 380-387 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.61.380
  20. Terashirna, K., S. Akita, and N Sakai 1995 Eco-physiological charac-teristics related with lodging tolerance of nce in direct sowing culti-vation I Relationship between the charactensucs of root distnbution in the soil and lodgmg tolerance Japan J Crop Sci 64(2) 243-250 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.64.243
  21. Thompson, J 1999 Methods for mcreasmg nee water use efficiency RIce water use efficiency workshop proceedmgs Yanco (Austraha), CRC for Sustainable RIce Production pp 45-46
  22. Tuong, To Phuc 2003 Strategies for mcreasmg water productivity in rice irngation water-saving irngatron technologies International Symposium on Enhancement of Water Use Efficiency in Lowland rice Cultivation pp.41-65
  23. Tuong, T P and BAM Bouman 2002 RIce production in water-scarce environments In :kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D(eds),Water Productrvrty in Agnculture Limits and Opporturuues for Improvement. The Comprehensive Assessment of Water Manage-ment in Agncultures Senes Vol 1 CABI Publrshmg. Wallmgford UK pp 1-342
  24. 元鐘建, 崔忠惇, 李外鉉, 金七龍, 李相哲 1997 벼 乾畓直播 栽培 時 深水灌溉가 生育과 收量에 미치는 影饗. 韩國作物會誌. 42(2) 166-172