DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparison study for mask plantar pressure measures to the difference of shoes in 20 female

20대 여성의 신발종류에 따른 족저압 영역별 비교 연구

  • Published : 2004.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the test-retest of plantar pressures using the F-Scan system over speeds and plantar regions. 6 healthy female subjects in 20's were recruited for the study. Plantar pressure measurements during locomotor activities can provide information concerning foot function, particularly if the timing and magnitude of the loading profile can be related to the location of specific foot structures such as the metatarsal heads. The Tekscan F-Scan system consists of a flexible, 0.18mm thick sole-shape having 1260 pressure sensors, the sensor insole was trimmed to fit the subjects' right. left shoes - sneakers shoes & dress shoes. It was calibrated by the known weight of the test subject standing on one foot. The Tekscan measurements show the insole pressure distribution as a function of the time. This finding has important implications for the development of plantar pressure test protocols where the function of the forefoot is important. According to the result of analysis it is as follows 1) Center of force trajectory in women's dress shoes display direct movement, compare with center of force trajectory in Sneaker shoes displays a little bit curved slow pronation movement. Sneaker shoes in forefoot part display very quick supination movement, therefore, this shoes effects negative effectiveness for ankle's stability Considering center of force trajectory analyzing the more center of force close straight line, the more movement can be quick movement for locomotion. For foot pressure distribution, center of force trajectory in locomotion is better to curved trajectory with pronation movement. So sneaker shoes style is good shoes considering center of pressure distribution trajectory compare with women's dress shoes. 2) Women's dress shoes increased peak pressure in medial, this is effected by high hill's height. The more increased women's dress shoes's height, the more women's peak pressure will increase, pronation can increase compare with before. Supination movement increase, this focused pressure in lateral, also, supination increased more. If the supination movement increased, foot pressure focused in lateral, therefore, it is appeared force distribution in gait direction. This is bad movement in foot's stability. 3) Women's dress shoes in landing phase displayed a long time, this is when women's dress shoes wear, gait movement is unbalance, so, landing phase displayed a long time. For compensation in gait, swing phase quick movement. 4) Women's dress shoes displayed peak pressure distribution in lateral of rearfoot part, Sneakers shoes displayed peak pressure distribution in medial of forefoot part. Its results has good impact absorption compare with women's dress shoes. In forefoot part, sneakers shoes has good propulsive force compare with women's dress shoes.

Keywords

References

  1. 강길령 (1994). 보행각의 정도에 따른 발의 압력분포에 관한 연구. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문, 30-34.
  2. 곽창수(1993). 운동화 중저의 경도가 주행시 발바닥의 압력 분포와 충격흡수에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 박사학위논문, 80-89.
  3. 김석관(2000). 신발산업의 기술혁선 패턴과 전개방향. 과학기술정책연구원, 72.
  4. 김세나(2000). 신발착용살태 조사와 치수 몇 형태 개선을 위한 제언. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위논문, 15.
  5. 김준환(1995). 족저압 측정기를 이용한 신발뒷굽 형태에 따른 보행시 족저압분포에 관한 연구, 연세대학교 석사학위논문, 8-17
  6. 백남종, 임민석 (1997). 보행시 족저압 중심의 이동경로에 관한 연구. 재활의학회지, 제 21권 4호.
  7. 신선우(1997). 발 형태 분류와 보행시 굽높이에 따른 압력분포. 계명대학교 박사학위논문. 62-77.
  8. 이규환, 박시복, 이상건, 이강목(1996). 족저압 측정에 의한 정상인 Stance Phase의 분석. 대한재활의학회지, 제20권 2호.
  9. 장길환, 허진영 (1992). 신발 디자인. 조형사.
  10. 최순복(2001). 발의 불편감에 영향을 미치는 구두형태 몇 보행특성. 건국대학교 박사학위논문, 25-27.
  11. Clarke, T. E.(1980). The pressure distribution under foot during barefoot walking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University, University park; 25-35.
  12. Mann, R. A.(1980). Biomechanics of Running, In Symposium on the foot and leg in running sports. R. P. Mack(ed), st. Louis. The C. V. Mosby Co.; 1-29.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Corrective Exercise on Cobb's Angle, Static and Dynamic Foot Pressure of Patients With Kyphosis vol.24, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2014.24.2.103
  2. The Effects on Erector Spine Muscles and Calf Muscle Activity according to Book Bag Handling Styles and Footwear vol.9, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5627/KACE.2011.9.1.029
  3. A Comparative Analysis on Changes of Foot Pressure by Shoe Heel Height during Walking vol.19, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.4.771
  4. Investigation of the Ground Reaction Force Parameters According to the Shoe's heel Heights and Landing Distance during Downward Stairs on Bus vol.24, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2014.24.2.151
  5. The Analysis of Joint Motion of Lower Extremities to Running Velocities and Cutting Angles vol.17, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.1.009
  6. The effects of shoe heel height and gait velocity on position sense of the knee joint and balance vol.28, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.2482
  7. Kinetic Differences between Normal-design Running Shoes and Spring-loaded Running Shoes vol.19, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.3.581
  8. The Effect of Backward Pedaling Ergometer Training on Ankle ROM, Lower Extremities Strength, Foot Pressure in Hemiplegia vol.8, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2013.8.3.467
  9. The Kinematical Comparative Analysis Between Spring Shoe and General Shoe vol.17, pp.1, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2007.17.1.099
  10. Gait Analysis on the Elderly Women with Foot Scan vol.15, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.4.613
  11. Evaluation of Foot Pressures and Subjective Discomfort Ratings associated with Sneakers, High Heels, and Kill Heels vol.28, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.3.095