Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지

Studies of the egg drop laying diseases from the mass zone layer

산란계 밀집지역의 산란저하성 질병에 관한 연구

  • Lee Jeoung-Won (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Eum Sung-Shim (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Park In-Gyu (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Bea Joung-Jun (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Joung Dong-Suk (Jeonbuk Livestock Development & Research Institute) ;
  • Song Hee-Jong (Bio-Safety Research Institute, Chonbuk, National University)
  • Published : 2005.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Newcastle disease (ND), infectious bronchitis (IB), low pathogenic avian Influenza (LPAI) and fowl typhoid (FT) have been known as egg drop laying diseases because of the serious layer damage from mass zone layer. In this study, such egg drop laying diseases were investigated. To access this study, we peformed to evaluate antibody titers in serum and isolated bacteria and virus from organs and feces on May, July and September in 2003. The distribution of ND from January to May, IB and LPAI from October to February of the next year, and FT from March to September were inspected by the question survey in 21 farms. ND revealed to be positive rates of 490 to 474 $(96.7\%)$ in May, 510 to 506 $(99.2\%)$ in July and 510 to 510 $(100\%)$ in September with hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. The mean antibody titers were 10.2, 9.9 and 10.2, respectively. With regard to IB, 484 out of 490 samples $(98.7\%)$ in May, 508 of 510 $(99.6\%)$ in July and 509 of 510 $(99.8\%)$ in September showed positive results and the mean antibody titers were gradually increased with 8.2, 9.0 and 9.4, respectively. According to HI test of LPAI, the positive results were shown in 442 of 480 $(92.1\%)$, 394 of 494 $(79.8\%)$ and 402 of 483 $(83.2\%)$ in May, July and September, respectively The mean antibody titers were decreased with 4.6, 4.3 and 4.0. The distribution of LPAI also elicited the positive rates of 480 to 475 $(99.0\%)$ in May, 494 to 485$(98.2\%)$ in July, 483 to 472 $(97.7\%)$ in September as determined by ELISA and the mean S/P ratio were 2.319, 2.557 and 2.380, respectively. Compared ELISA results with HI test of LPAI the positive results were 480 to 422 $(92.1\%),\;475(99.0\%),\;494\;to\;394 (79.8\%),\;485 (98.2\%)\;and\;483\;to\;402(83.2\%),\;472(97.7\%)$. Therefore, the positive rate determined by ELISA was higher than that of HI test with 6.9, 18.4 and $14.5\%$, respectively. When performed RT-PCR for ND using organ and feces samples, the pathotypes were detected $5(15.6\%)\;in\;May,\; 2(5.3\%) in\;July,\;2(7.1\%)$ in September but there is no samples showing positive band for LPAI. In attempt to isolate Salmonella gallinarum, bacteria were obtained from 4 cases (12.5%) in May, 9 (23.6%) in July, 5 (17.8%) in September. Thus the highest rate for isolation revealed to be shown in July When evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility to 18 isolated strains of 5. gallinarum, bacteria were sensitive to trimethoprim/sulfamethox$(61.1\%),\;kanamycin\;(55.5\%),\;ampicillin\;(55.5\%)$ and amoxacillin/clavulanic acid $(55.5\%)$, cephalothin $(50.0\%)$, but resistant to penicillin $(88.9\%)$, streptomycin $(88.9\%)$, erythromycin $(83_4\%)$ and tetracycline $(61.1\%)$. According to HI test of ND and LPAI using captured 164 wild Korean tree sparrows (Passer nontanus), the positive rates were $47.6\%\;and\;57.3\%$, and the mean HI titers were 5.32 and 4.02, respectively. 71 $(43.2\%)\;and\;58(35.3\%)$ in captured sparrows also showed more than 4 titers for HI test to ND and LPAI, respectively However, the attempt for isolation of viruses failed in all samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Kraneveld FC. 1926. A poultry disease in the Dutch East In- dies. Ned Indisch BI Diergeneeskd 38: 448-450
  2. Doyle TM. 1927. A hitherto unrecorded disease of fowl due to a filter-passing virus. J Comp Pathol Therap 40: 144-169
  3. Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, et al. 2003. Diseasess of Poultry, 11th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa: 63-92, 101-119, 135-160, 567-613
  4. 최원필, 송희종, 김순재 등. 1997. 수의전염병학. 경북대학교출판부, 대구 : 423-427, 429-432, 428-429
  5. Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, et al. 1997. Diseases of Poultry, 10th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa: 82-96, 511-526, 541-569, 583-605
  6. Hanson RP, Brandly CA. 1995. Identification of vaccine strains of Newcastle disease virus. Science 122: 156-157
  7. Alexander DJ, Allan WH. 1974. Newcastle disease virus pathotypes. Avian Pathol 3: 269-278 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457409353840
  8. Jordan FTW, Pattison M. 1996. Poultry disease. 4th ed : 139- 155, 178-186
  9. Timoney JF, Gillepsie JH, Scott FW, et al. 1988. Hagan and Bruner's Microbiology and Infectious Diseases of Domestic Animals. 8th ed. Cornell University Press, Itacha, New York: 813-818, 905-908
  10. Charlton BR, Bermudez AJ, Boulianne M, et al. 1996. Avian Disease Manual. 4th ed. American Association of Avian Pathologist, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania : 49-52
  11. 윤용덕, 강영배, 김종염 등. 1998. 외래동물질병 도감. 농림부, 국립수의과학검역원 : 60-63, 70-76
  12. Schalk AF, Hawn MC. 1931. An apparently new respiratory disease of baby chicks. JAVMA 78: 413-422
  13. 유태석. 1968. 닭의 전염성 기관지염 바이러스에 관한 연구, 1. 전염성 기관지염 바이러스의 항체가에 대한 분포조사. 대한수의학회지 8(1) : 24-30
  14. 김순재, 이영옥, 김선중 등. 1980. 특정전염성 병인체에 대한 국내 종계의 항체 보유상황. 대한수의학회지 20(1) : 59-64
  15. 이영옥, 김재홍, 김재학 등. 1986. 전염성 기관지염 국내 발생. 대한수의학회지 26(2) : 277-282
  16. 권혁준, 이동우, 안영기 등. 2001. 1986년 이전 국내 전염성 기관지염 바이러스의 확인. 대한수의학회지 41(1) : 59-65
  17. Song CS, Lee YJ, Lee CW, et al. 1998. Induction of protective immunity in chickens vaccinated with infectious bronchitis virus SI glycoprotein expressed by a recombinant baculovirus. J Gen Virol 79: 719-723 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-79-4-719
  18. De Wit JJ. Mekkes DR, Kouwenhoven B, et al. 1997. Sensitivity and specificity of serological tests for detection of infectious bronchitis virus induced antibodies in broilers. Avian Pathol 26: 105-118 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459708419198
  19. Handberg KJ, Nielsen OL, Pedersen MW, et al. 1999. Detection and strain differentiation of infectious bronchitis virus in tracheal tissues from experimentally infected chickens by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Comparison with an immunnohistochemical technique. Avian Pathol 28 : 327-335 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079459994579
  20. Gorman OT, Bean WJ, Kawaoka Y, et al, 1991. Evolution of influenza A virus nucleoprotein genes: implications for the origins of H1N1 human and classical swine viruses. J Virol 65: 3704-3714
  21. Horimoto T, Kaswaoka Y. 2001. Pande mic threat posed by avian influenza A viruses. Clin Microbiol Rev 14 (1) : 129 -149 https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.14.1.129-149.2001
  22. Rohm C, Zhou N, Suss J, et al. 1996. Characterization of a novel influenza hemagglutinin, H15: criteria for determination of influenza A subtypes. Virology 217: 508-516 https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1996.0145
  23. Schild GC, Oxford JS, Newman RW. 1981. Evidence for antigenic variation in influenza A nucleoprotein. Virology 93 : 569-573 https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(79)90259-9
  24. Alexander DJ 2000. A review of avian influenza in different bird species. Vet Microbiol 74 : 3-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(00)00160-7
  25. 한명국, 박경윤, 권용국 등. 2002. 가금인플루엔자 바이러스 항체검출을 위한 혈청학적 진단 비교법. 대한수의학회지 42(1) : 73-80
  26. Zhou NN, Shortridge KF, Class ECJ, et al. 1999. Rapid evolution of H5N1 influenza viruses in chickens in Hong Kong. J Virol 73 (4) : 3366-3374
  27. Tumpey TM, Suarez DL, Perkins LEL, et al, 2002. Characterization of a highly pathogenic H5N1. A virus isolated from duck meat. J Virol 76 (12) : 6344-6355 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.76.12.6344-6355.2002
  28. Dybing JK, Schultz-Cherry S, Swayne DE, et al. 2000. Distinct pathogenesis of Hong Kong origin H5N1 viruses in mice compared to that of other highly pathogenic H5 avian influenza viruses. J Virol 74 (3) : 1443-1450 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.3.1443-1450.2000
  29. Donaelli I, Camptelli L, Trani LD, et al. 2001. Characterization of H5N2 in- fluenza viruses from Italian poultry. J Gen Virol 82 (3) : 623-630 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-82-3-623
  30. Kawaoka Y, Nawevw CW, Webster RG. 1984. Is virulence of H5N2 influenza viruses in chickens associated with loss of carbohydrate from the hemagglutinin. Virology 139: 303-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6822(84)90376-3
  31. Bean WJ, Kawaoka Y, Wood JM, et al. 1985. Characterization of virulent and avirulentA/chicken/Pennsylvania/83 in fluenza A viruses: potential role of de fective interfering RNAs in nature. J Virol 54: 151 - 160
  32. Govorkova EA, Leneva IA, Goloubeva OG, et al. 2001. Comparisons of efficacies of RWJ270201, Zanamivir, and Oselramivir against H5N1, H9N2, and other avian influenza viruses. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 45 (10) : 2723-2732 https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.45.10.2723-2732.2001
  33. Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, et al. 1999. Molecular characterization of H9N2 influenza viruses : Were they the donors of the 'internal' genes of H5N1 viruses in Hong Kong? Microbiology 96 (16) : 363-367
  34. Xiuhua LU, Renshaw M, Terrence M, et al. 2001. Immunity to influenza A H9N2 viruses induced by infection and vaccination. J Virol 75 (10) : 4896-4901 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.10.4896-4901.2001
  35. Hoffmann E, Stech J, Leneva I, et. al. 2000. Characterization of the Influenza A virus gene pool in avian species in southern China: Was H5N1 a aerivative or a precursor of H5N1?. J Virol 74 (14) : 6309-6315 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.14.6309-6315.2000
  36. Suarez DL, Perdue ML, Cox N, et al. 1998. Comparisons of highly virulent H5N1 influenza A viruses isolated from Hong Kong. J Virol 72 (8) : 6678-6688
  37. Angela N, Cauthen DE. Swayne SSC, et al. 2000. Continued circulation in China of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses encoding the hemagglutinin gene associated with the 1997 H5N1 outbreak in poultry and humans. J Virol 47 (14) : 6592-6599
  38. Gue YJ, Li JG, Cheng XW, et al. 1999. Discovery of men infected by avian influenza A(H9N2) virus. J Exp Clin Virol 13: 105-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-6532(99)00027-X
  39. Mase M, Imada T, Sanada Y, et al. 2001. Imported parakeets harbor H9N2 influenza A viruses that are genetically closely related to those transmitted to humans in Hong Kong. J Virol 75 (7) : 3490-3494 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.7.3490-3494.2001
  40. Lin YP, Shaw M, Gregory V, et al. 2000. Avian-to-human transmission of H9N2 subtype influenza A viruses: Relationship between H9N2 and H5N1 human isolates. PNAS 97 (17) : 9654-9658 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.160270697
  41. Suarez DL, Garcia M, Latimer J, et al. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of H7 avian influenza viruses isolated from the live bird markets of the northeast United States. J Virol 73 (5) : 3567-3573
  42. Guan Y, Shortridge KF, Krauss S, et al. 2000. H9N2 influenza viruses possessing H5N1-like internal genomes continue to circulate in poultry in southeastern China. J Virol 74 (20) : 9372-9380 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.74.20.9372-9380.2000
  43. Mo IP, Song CS, Kim KS, et al. 1997. An occurrence of non-highly pathogenic avian influenza in Korea. in Proceedings. 4th International Symposium on Avian Influenza: 379-383
  44. Abraham A, Sivanandan V, Newman JA, et al. 1984. Rapid purification of avian influenza virus for use in en-zyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Vet Res 45 : 959-962.
  45. Beck JR, Swayne DE. 1997. Evaluation of ELISA for avian influenza serologic and diagnostic programs: Comparison with agar gel precipitin and hemagglutination inhibition tests. in Proceedings. 4th International Symposium on Avian Influenza: 297-303
  46. Toshihiro I, Hideo G, Eiji Y, et al. 2001. Generation of a highly pathogenic avain influenza A virus from an avirulent field isolate by passaging in chickens. J Virol 75 (9) : 4439-4443 https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.75.9.4439-4443.2001
  47. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA et al. 1994. Bergey's manual of Determin ative bacteriology, 9th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Maryland: 186-187
  48. Linton AH. 1983. Guidelines on prevention and control of Salmonellosis. Genova, World Health organizationon : 10-128
  49. 이상규, 소병재, 허문 등. 2004. 가축전염병편람. 국립수의과학원, 건양기획인쇄 : 6-9
  50. 김순재, 이승이. 1987. 뉴캣슬병에 대한 야외계군의 항체 보유상황에 관한 연구. 한국수의공중보건학회지. 11(2) : 35-40
  51. 송창선, 이윤정, 한명국 등. 2000. 최근 야외농장에서 실시하고 있는 뉴캣슬병 생독백신 접종효능에 대한 평가. 대한수의학회지 40(3) : 563-573
  52. 이정원, 허철호, 이종환 등. 2001. 도축육계에서 뉴캣슬병 바이러스에 대한 혈중항체가 조사. 한국가축위생학회지 24(3) : 217-222
  53. Lee SK, Sung HW, Kwon HM. 2004. S1 glycoprotein gene analysis of infectious bronchitis viruses isolated in Korea. J Virol 149 (3) : 481-494
  54. Suarez DL, Schultz-Cherry S. 2000. Immunology of avain influenza virus: a review. Deveop Comp Immunol 24: 269-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(99)00078-6
  55. 박종명. 2004. 2003-2004년 고병원성조류 인플루엔자 역학조사 보고서. 건양기획인쇄 : 161-186
  56. 성환우, 이재길, 이윤정 등. 2002. 국내유행 가금인플루엔자 바이러스의 특성 및 진단법 개선연구. 국립수의과학원, 건양인쇄사 : 510-520
  57. Beard CW. 1970. Avian influenza antibody detection by immunodifusion. Avian Dis 14: 337-341 https://doi.org/10.2307/1588477
  58. Alexander DJ, 1982. Allan WH. Avian influenza in turkeys : a survey of farms in eastern England 1979/80. Br Vet J 138: 473-479 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1935(17)30932-6
  59. Abraham A, Sivanandan V, Halvorson DA, et al. 1986. Standardization of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for avian influenza virus antibodies in turkey. Am J Vet Res 47: 561-566
  60. Fatunmbi A, Newman JA, Sivanandan V, et al. 1989. A broad spectrum avian influenza subtype antigen for indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Avian Dis 33: 264-269 https://doi.org/10.2307/1590842
  61. 박남용, 최효임, 조호성 등. 2002. In situ RT-PCR 및 In situ hybridization 기법에 의한 닭 뉴캣슬병의 진단법 개발. 대한수의학회지 42(3) : 351-362
  62. Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey GR, et al. 1994. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Wolfe: 284-234
  63. 이영주, 강민수, 우용구 등. 2000. 가금티푸스 및 파라티푸스 예방효과 증진에 관한 연구. 국립수의과학원, 건양인쇄사 : 469-478
  64. 오강희, 박노찬, 조민희 등. 2000. 최근 경북지역의 양계농장에서 발생한 Salmonellosis의 역학적 특성. 한국가축위생학회지 23(1) : 45-59
  65. 우용구, 김봉환. 1998. 가금티푸스균의 인공감염에 대한 백색 및 갈색 산란계 계통간의 내병성 비교. 대한수의학회지 38(4) : 784-792
  66. Smith HW, Tucker JF. 1979. The effect on the virulence and infectivity of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmon ella gallinarum of acquiring antibiotic resistance plasmids from organisms that had caused serious outbreaks of disease. J Hyg Camb 83: 305-317 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022172400026103
  67. 김원용, 장영효, 박경윤 등. 1995. 가금에서 분리한 Salmonella속 균의 항균물질에 대한 감수성 및 plasmid profile. 대한수의학회지 35(3) : 537-542