Composites Research

The Korean Society for Composite Materials (한국복합재료학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Low Velocity Impact Response of Woven Fabric Composites for the Hybrid Composite Train Bodyshell

하이브리드 복합재 철도차량 차체 적용 적층판의 저속충격특성 연구

  • 이재헌 (서울산업대학교 기계공학과 대학원) ;
  • 정성균 (서울산업대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 김정석 (한국철도기술연구원)
  • Published : 2005.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents a study on the low velocity impact response of the woven fabric laminates for the hybrid composite bodyshell of a tilting railway vehicle. In this study, the low velocity impact tests for the three laminates with size of $100mm\times100mm$ were conducted at three impact energy levels of 2.4J, 2.7J and 4.2J. Based on the tests, the impact force, the absorbed energy and the damaged area were investigated according to the different energy levels and the stacking sequences. The damage area was evaluated by the visual inspection and the C-scan device. The test results show that the absorbed energy of [fill]8 laminate is highest whereas (fill2/warp2)s is lowest. The [fill]8 laminate has the largest damage area because of the highest impact energy absorption.

본 논문에서는 하이브리드 복합재 철도차량차체에 적용되는 복합적층판에 대한 저속충격시험을 수행하였다. 이를 위해 2.4J, 2.7J 및 4.2J의 세 가지 충격에너지 조건에서 세 가지의 다른 적층구조를 갖는 적층판에 대한 저속충격시험을 수행하였다. 시험에 적용된 직조된 카본/에폭시 적층판의 크기는 $100mm\times100mm$ 이다. 충격시험 후 충격하중이력, 흡수된 에너지 및 손상면적 등이 각 충격에너지와 적층순서에 따라 고찰되었다. 손상면적은 육안검사와 C-scan을 이용하여 동시에 검사하였다. 시험결과 흡수된 에너지는 $[fill]_8$, 적층판이 가장 높았고 $[fill_2,/warp_2)_s$ 적층판이 가장 낮았다. 또한 손상면적은 $[fill]_8$, 적층판에서 가장 넓은데 이것은 상대적으로 흡수에너지가 높기 때문이다.

Keywords

References

  1. http://www.railway-technical.com/train-maint.html
  2. M. Hintermann, 'Composite Processing Technologies for Railway Applications,' The COMPOSIT Workshop on Composite Manufacturing for Transportation Applications, Germany, 2002
  3. S. Abrate, 'Impact of Laminated Composites: Recent Advances,' Appl Mech Rev 1994, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 517-544 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3111065
  4. S. Abrate, 'Impact of Laminated Composite Materials: a Review,' Appl Mech Rev 1991, Vol. 44, No.4, pp. 155-189 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119500
  5. M. O. W. Richardson and M. J. Wisheart, 'Review of Low-Velocity Impact Properties of Composite Materials,' Composites Part A 27A, 1996, pp. 1123-1131
  6. Y. S. Lee, K. H. Kang, O. Park , 'Response of Hybrid Laminated Composite Plates Under Low Velocity Impact,' Computer and Structures, Vol. 65, No.6, 1997, pp. 965-974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00298-7
  7. T. W. Shyr and Y. H. Pan, 'Impact Resistance and Damage Characteristics of Composite Laminates,' Composites Structures, Vol. 62, 2003, pp. 193-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00114-4
  8. M .V. Hosur, M. Adbullah and S. Jeelani, 'Studies on the Low-Velocity Impact Response of Woven Hybrid Composites,' Composites Structures, Vol. 67, 2005, pp. 253-262 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.024
  9. G. A. O. Davies and D. Hitchings, 'Impact Damage and Residual Strengths of Woven Fabric Glass/polyester Laminates,' Composites Part A 27A, 1996, pp. 1147-1156