Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지

Traffic Flow Analysis by Delay Penalty and Road Pricing

지각패널티와 변동요금에 의한 교통류 분석 연구

  • 변완희 (한국IBM 유비쿼터스컴퓨팅연구소) ;
  • 김주현 (안양대학교 도시정보공학과) ;
  • 최병국 (인천발전연구원 교통물류연구실) ;
  • 송두석 (서울시립대학교)
  • Published : 2005.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With rapid development Telematics industry, the concern of dynamic road pricing system is increasing. In this study, the change of traffic flows according to traffic information and variation of congestion road prices related to the dynamic road pricing was analyzed. In this study, three facts were unfolded. First, high delay penalty and low delay penalty drivers are shown different reaction for the different congestion road prices. Second, the higher congestion road prices the more drivers convert their route from toll road to non toll road. Third, high penalty drivers are converting to toll road than low delay penalty drivers under same congestion road prices. This study has reached the conclusion that dynamic congestion pricing has a high possibility for traffic management.

과거 혼잡세 이론의 초기부터 주장되어온 변동요금징수 체계는 최근 텔레매틱스 산업의 발전과 더불어 기술적 제약이 해결되면서 여러 국가에서 시행되고 있다. 본 연구는 변동요금 체계와 관련하여 교통정보와 요금의 변화가 교통류에 미치는 영향을 시뮬레이션을 이용하여 분석하였고, 이로부터 변동요금에 의한 교통류 관리 방안의 가능성을 제시하고 있다. 본 연구를 통해 고패널티 운전자와 저패널티 운전자간의 시간가치가 달라 요금에 대한 저항이 다르다는 것, 통행요금이 증가하면 운전자들의 요금저항 역시 증가하여 고속도로에서 일반도로에의 이용자 전환이 촉진되는 것을 확인하였다. 또한, 통행요금, 고패널티 운전자비율과 평균소요시간의 관계 분석을 통해서는, 동일한 통행요금 체계일지라도 도로 네트워크내의 고패널티 운전자 비율에 따라서 교통류 상태가 가변적이라는 것을 확인함으로써, 지각패널티와 통행요금에 의한 효율적인 교통류 관리방안의 가능성을 발견하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 변완희.飯田恭敬.김주현.宇野伸宏(2003), 운전자의 패널티 차이가 경로선택행동에 미치는 영향의 분석 및 경로선택 모뎀의 개발, 대한토목학회지
  2. Akamtsu, T. and Kuwahara, M. (2000), Dynamic Network Equilibrium Model of Simulations Route/Departure Time Choice for a Many-to-One OD Pattern, submitted to Transportation Research B
  3. Chang, G.L. and B.S., Mahmassani(1998), Travel Time Prediction and Departure Time Adiustment Behavior Dynamics in a Congested Traffic System. Transportation Research, Vol. 22B. pp.217-232 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(88)90017-3
  4. Fujii, S. T. Morita, R. Kitamura and M. Sugiyama. ( 1999). An Emprical Analysis of the Heterogeneity in Attitude toward Uncertainty and Development of a Route-Choice Model for Demand Forecasting, Infrastructure Planning Review, No. 16 https://doi.org/10.2208/journalip.16.569
  5. Hall. R. W. (1983), Travel Outcome and Performance the Effect of Uncertainty on Accessibility. Transportation Research. Vol.17B. pp.275-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(83)90046-2
  6. Jeffrey L. Adler. Wilfred W.Recker. Michael G. McMally (1993). A Conflict Model and Interactive Simulator(FASTCARS) for Predicting Enroute Driver Behavior in Response to Real to Peal-Time Traffic Condition Information. Published in Transportation. 20. pp.83-106 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01307054
  7. Karthik K. Srinivasan, Bani S. :Mahrnassani (1999). Modeling Inertia and Compliance Mechanisms in Route Choice Behavior under Real-Time Information. Transportation Research Board and publication in Transportation Research Record https://doi.org/10.3141/1725-07
  8. Kristian Waersted (2004). Urban Road Tolling-the Norwegian experience. Stockholm City Council Seminar
  9. Kuwahara. M. (1985), A Time-Dependent Network Analysis for Highway Commute Traffic in a Single Core City. Institute of Transportation Studies. University of California. Berkeley. Dissertation Series. UCB-ITS-DS-85-2
  10. Magnus Carle(2004), Congestion Charging in Stockholm. Stockholm City Council Seminar
  11. Malcolm Murray-Clark(2004). Central London Congestion Charging Design & Impact. Stockholm City Council Seminar
  12. Michael Howell(2004), Plans for Congestion Charging in Edinburgh. Stockholm City Council Seminar
  13. Nagoya Expressway Public Corporation(2004). www.nagoya-expressway.or.jp/topic/ninka16/fukiagee tc.html.
  14. Nobuhiro Uno. Yasunori Iida. Seiichiro Kawaratani and Masumi Suganuma. (2001). An Analysis of Potential of Providing Information on Traffic Accident to Enhance Travel Time Reliability. INSTR, pp.65-68
  15. Ran. B., Hall. R.W. and Boyce. D.E. (1996). A Link-Based Variation Inequality Model for Dynamic Departure Time/Route Choice. Transportation Research 30B. pp.31-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2615(95)00010-0
  16. Shoichiro Nakayama and Ryuichi Kitamura(2000). A Route Choice Model with Inductive Learning, TRB 00733. p.10
  17. Yamashita. S. and K. Kuroda.(1996). Uncertainty Evaluation and Delay Avoidance in Mode Choice. Journal of Infrastructure Planning and Management, Japan Society of Civil Engineers. No.536, IV-31. pp.59-68
  18. Yasunori Iida, Nobuhiro Uno and Tadashi Yamada (1999), Experimental Analysis of Effects of Travel Time Information on Dynamic Route Choice Behavior. In Behavior and Network Impacts of Driver Information Systems(Emmelink. R. and Nijkamp. R.eds), Ashgate
  19. 饭田恭敬(2002), 道路交通情报ビジネス发展への期待, 警察学論集第55巻第7号, pp.1-16
  20. 饭田恭敬, 柳泽吉保, 内田敬(1991), 通勤交通の経路迭择と出发肘刻分布の同时推定法, 土木计画学研究論文集, No.9, pp.93-100
  21. 宇野伸宏(1997), 室内実強にもとづいた交通情披提供下での経造择行功分析と效果平価分析, 京都大学, 博士学位論文, pp.161-166
  22. 山下智志, 黑田甠彦(1996), 交通机?定湘时性と尺刻回避形效用关数, 土木學會論文集, No.536/IV-31, pp.59-68
  23. 小川圭一(1999.8.4), 交通情披提供による経路造择行動への影響, 土木计画学会学术硏究会, ITS硏究ワークショップ