Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Scientists of Korea (대한화장품학회지)

Society of Cosmetic Scientists of Korea (대한화장품학회)
권호 표지

Development of Non-contact Image Measuring Technique for Evaluating Micro-relief

미세주름 측정을 위한 비접촉식 영상측정기술의 발전

  • 김남수 (㈜엘리드 피부과학 연구소) ;
  • 김용민 (㈜엘리드 피부과학 연구소)
  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Assurance of the objectivity and reproducibility is a major key point in wrinkle measurement used for evaluating the degree of skin aging. The measurement of relief is quickly converted to a non-contact method, of which tools or instruments do not come in contact with skin directly, to minimize the artificial effects which influence the shape or depth of the relief. Here, we showed how wrinkle measurement techniques have been changed briefly and compared PRIMOS and replica method in the point of view of measurement principle and features, the former is non-contact fringe projection tool and the latter is contact type of the method.

피부노화의 정도를 판정하기 위해 사용되는 주름측정법들은 객관성과 재현성의 확보가 중요한 요소이다. 최근의 경향은 주름의 형태나 깊이에 주는 영향을 최소화하기 위해 주름 측정시 피부에 직접 기계나 도구를 접촉하지 않고 측정하는 비접촉식 측정방법으로 빠르게 전환되고 있는 상황이다. 저자들은 주름측정 기술의 변천 과정을 간단히 살펴보고, 비접촉식 fringe projection 방식의 미세주름 측정기기인 PRIMOS를 중심으로 측정원리, 특징들을 접촉식 측정방법인 모사판을 이용한 방법과 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. T. H. Cook, T. J Craft, R. L. Brunelle, F. Norris, and W. A. Griffin, Quantification of the skin's topography by skin profilometry, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci., 4, 195 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1982.tb00314.x
  2. K. D. Paepe, .J. M. Lagarde, Y. Gall, D. Roseeuw, and V. Rogiers, Microrelief of the skin using a light transmission method, Arch Dermatol., Res., 292, 500 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1007/s004030000166
  3. K. Hashimoto, New methods for surface ultrastructure: comparative studies of scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy and replica method, Int. J. Dermatol., 13, 357 (1974) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1974.tb05068.x
  4. P. Corcuff, J. de Rigal, JL. Leveque, S. Makki, and P. Agache, Skin relief and ageing, J. Soc. Cosmet. Sci., 34, 177 (1983)
  5. P. Corcuff, F. Chatenay, and JL. Leveque, A fully automated system to study skin surface patterns, Int. J. Cosmet Sci., 6, 167 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1984.tb00373.x
  6. J. K. Prall, Instrumental evaluation of the effects of cosmetic products on skin surfaces with particular reference to smoothness, J. soc. Cosmet. Chem., 24, 693 (1973)
  7. S. Makki, J. C. Barbenel, and P. Agache, A quantitative method for the assessment of the microtopography of human skin, Acta. Derm. Venereol., 59, 285 (1979)
  8. M. Takahashi, Image analysis of skin surface contour, Acta. Derm Venereol Suppl., 185, 9 (1994)
  9. A. Courteville, T. Gharbi, and J. Y. Cornu, Noncontact MMG sensor based on the optical feedback effect in a laser diode, J. Biomed. Optics, 281 (1998)
  10. T. W. Fischer, W. Wigger-Alberti, and P. Elsner, Direct and non-direct measurement techniques for analysis of skin surface topography, Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol., 12, 1 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1159/000029840
  11. K. H. Lee, S. B. Son, and H. P. Park, Measurement systems for rapid product development, J. Kor. Soc. Prec. Eng., 17(5), 26 (2000)
  12. S. Jaspers, H. Hopermann, G. Sauermann, U. Hoppe, R. Lunderstadt, and J. Ennen, Rapid in vivo measurement of the topography of human skin by active image triangulation using a digital micromirror device, Skin Res. Technol., 5, 195 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.1999.tb00131.x
  13. J. M. Lagarde, C. Rouvrais, D. Black, S. Diridollou, and Y. Gall, Skin topography measurement by interference fringe projection: a technical validation, Skin Res. Technol., 7, 112 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.007001001.x
  14. P. M. Friedman, G. R. Skover, G. Payonk, ANB. Kauvar, and R. G. Geronemus, 3D In vivo optical skin imaging for topographical quantitative assessment of non-ablative laser technology, Dermatol. Surg., 28, 199 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02832.x