Comparison of Observational Posture Evaluation Methods based on Maximum Holding Times

최대 지속 시간에 근거한 관찰적 자세 평가 기법의 평가

  • Moon, Chanyoung (Mobile handset R&D center, LG Electronics) ;
  • Na, Seokhee (Division of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, POSTECH) ;
  • Kee, Dohyung (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Keimyung University) ;
  • Chung, Min K. (Division of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, POSTECH)
  • 문찬영 (LG전자 단말연구소) ;
  • 나석희 (포항공과대학교 기계산업공학부) ;
  • 기도형 (계명대학교 산업시스템공학과) ;
  • 정민근 (포항공과대학교 기계산업공학부)
  • Published : 2005.12.30

Abstract

This study aims to measure maximum holding times(MHTs) of symmetric and asymmetric whole body postures, and to compare three representative observational methods including OWAS, RULA, REBA, based on the MHTs. An experiment was conducted for obtaining the MHTs, in which hand position was used as experimental variable, and the MHT and subjective discomfort rating as dependent variables. The hand position was defined by the percentage of the shoulder height(%SH), the percentage of the arm reach(%AR) and rotation angle(R). The results showed that three independent variables of %SH, %AR and R significantly affected on the MHTs at ${\alpha}$=0.01, and that the MHTs were negatively linearly related to the discomfort scores of Borg CR10. It was also revealed that OWAS and REBA were less sensitive to postural stress than RULA. In addition, OWAS and REBA underestimated postural load of given postures compared to RULA. Therefore, it is recommended that among the three observational methods investigated in this study, RULA be used for a more precise evaluation of postural load.

Keywords

References

  1. Borg, G. (1993), Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales, Human Kinetics, Champaign(IL)
  2. Buchholz, B., Paquet, V., Punnett, L., Lee, D. and Moir, S. (1996), PATH: A work sampling-based approach to ergonomics job analysis for construction and other non-repetitive work, Applied Ergonomics, 27(3), 177-187 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(95)00078-X
  3. Chaffin, D. B., Andersson, G. B. J. and Bernard, B. (1999), Occupa- tional Biomechanics(3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York
  4. Chung, M. K, Lee, I.S., Kee, D. H. and Kim, S. H. (2002), A postural workload evaluation system based on a macro-postural classification, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 12(3), 267-277 https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.10017
  5. Corlett, E. N. and Manenica, I. (1980), The effect and measurement of working postures, Applied Ergonomics, 11 (1), 7-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(80)90115-5
  6. Dul, J., Douwes, M. and Smitt, P. (1994), Ergonomic guidelines for the prevention of discomfort of static postures on endurance data, Ergonomics, 37(5), 807-815 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963690
  7. Genaidy, A. M., Al-shedi, A. A. and Karwowski, W. (1994), Postural stress analysis in industry, Applied Ergonomics, 25 (2), 77-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(94)90068-X
  8. Grandjean, E. and Hnting, W. (1977), Ergonomics of postures -review of various problems of standing and sitting postures, Applied Ergonomics, 8(3), 135-140 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90002-3
  9. Hignett, S. and McAtamney, L. (2000), Rapid Entire Body Assessment(REBA), Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
  10. Juul-Kristensen, B., Fallentin, N. and Ekdahl, C. (1997), Criteria for classification of posture in repetitive work by observation methods: A review, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(5), 397-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00013-3
  11. Karhu, O., Kansi, P. and Kuorinka, I. (1977), Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 8(4), 199-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
  12. Kee, D. (2000), Review of postural classification schemes for evaluating postural load-focused on the observational methods, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Safety, 15(4), 139-149
  13. Kee, D. and Karwowski, W. (2001), LUBA: an assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time, Applied Ergonomics, 32(4),357-366 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00006-0
  14. Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science(KRISS), National Anthropomentic Survey of Korea 1997, Report No. KRISS-97-114-IR
  15. Kroemer, K. H. E., Kroemer, H. and Kroemer-Elbert, K. (1994), Ergonomics: How to design for easy & efficiency, Applied Ergonomics, 20(4), 274-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(89)90190-7
  16. Manenica, I. (1986), The Ergonomics of working postures: A technique for postural load assessment, in Corlett, E. N., Wilson, J. and Manenica, I. (Eds), The ergonomics of working posture, Taylor & Francis, London, 207-277
  17. McAtamney, L. and Corlett, E. N. (1993), RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
  18. Miedema, M. C? Douwes, M. and Dul, J. (1997), Recommended maximum holding times for prevention of discomfort of static standing postures, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(1), 9-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(95)00037-2
  19. Ministry of Labor (2004), Analysis of industrial accident 2002, from http://www.molab.go.kr
  20. Nag, P. K. (1991), Endurance limits in different modes of load holding, Applied Ergonomics, 22(3), 185-188 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90158-E
  21. Putz-Anderson, V. and Galinsky, T. L. (1993), Psychophysically determined work durations for limiting shoulder girdle fatigue from elevated manual work, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 11, 19-28
  22. Taksic, V. (1986), The Ergonomics of working postures: Comparsion of some indices of postural load assessment, in Corlett, E. N., Wilson, J. and Manenica, I. (Eds), The ergonomics of working posture, Taylor & Francis, London, 278-282
  23. van der Beek, A. J., van Gaalen, L. C. and Frigns-Dresen, M. H. W. (1992), Working postures and activities of lorry drivers: A reliability study of on site observation and recording on a pocket computer, Applied Ergonomics, 23(5), 331-226