The Appropriateness of using Standardized Patients' (SPs) Assessment Scores in Clinical Performance Examination (CPX)

진료수행시험 평가자로서 표준화 환자 활용의 타당성

Kim, Sun;Park, Sung-Whan;Hur, Ye-Ra;Lee, Soo-Jung
김선;박성환;허예라;이수정

  • Published : 2005.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyse the appropriateness of using standardized patients´ (SPs) assessment scores of medical students in clinical performance examination (CPX). Methods: 110 fourth year medical students in year four were divided into two large groups (group A and group B). Each group of students performed four different cases and overall, eight cases were tested. The examination were done by professors and the SPs using the same examination paper. Test scores were analysed per station and per each test domain. The differences between the two examiners were studied using paired t-test. Results: There were significant differences in the scores given out by the professors´ and the SP´s in four out of the eight stations. According to the examination results of each domain, four cases showed significant differences in the history taking category, three cases in the physical examination, one case in the information sharing, four cases in clinical courtesy, and two cases in physician-patient relationship category. Cronbach´s alpha scores of all stations were over 0.6, reflecting that the test items were appropriate for the examination. Conclusion: From the result of this study and according to many preceding studies, using SPs’ evaluation scores in CPX is appropriate. Some limitation of this study and ideas for improvement in using SPs in CPX are suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. 김 선(2004). “CPX의 타당도” 제1차 CPX 심포지 엄 자료집. 한국의학교육학회/한국의학교육연수 원. 51-57
  2. 김주자 외(2004). 일개 의과대학에서 실시한 표준화 환자(SP)를 이용한 임상수행능력평가시험(CPX) 결과 분석. 한국의학교육, 16(1), 51-61
  3. 유문숙(2002). 표준화 환자 학습방법이 유치도뇨술, 의사소통능력, 학습동기에 미치는 효과. 기본간호학회지, 9(1), 66-75
  4. 이병국(2001). 우리 나라 표준화 환자 프로그램 활 용 현황과 개선 방안 - 관련 문헌 고찰 및 현장연 구를 중심으로-. 한국의학교육, 13(1), 27-39
  5. 이병국(2000). 임상수행평가의 세계적 추세에 따른 표준화 환자 프로그램의 토착화 방안 연구. 한국의학교육, 12(2), 377-392
  6. 최윤호 외(2000). 임상실습 교육을 위한 표준화 환 자 프로그램의 개발 및 적용. 한국의학교육, 12(2), 353-361
  7. 한국의학교육학회(2003). 의학교육학용어집. 아카데 미아
  8. 홍영재(1992). Standardized Patients를 이용한 임상 교육. 한국의학교육, 4(2), 12-17
  9. Blue AV, Chessman AW, Gilbert GE & Mainous AG(2000). Responding to patients emotions: important for standardized patient satisfaction. Family Medicine, 32(5), 326-330
  10. Boulet JR, McKinley DW, Norcini JJ & Whelan GP(2002). Assessing the comparabiltiy of standardized Patient and Physician Evaluations of Clinical Skills. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7, 85-97 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015750009235
  11. Boulet JR, Champlain A & McKinley DW(2003). Setting defensible performance standards on OSCEs and standardized patient examinations. Medical Teacher, 25(3), 245-249 https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159031000100274
  12. Guiton G, Hodgson CS, Delandshere G & Luann Wilkerson(2004). Communication Skills in Standardized- Patient Assessment of Final-Year Medical Students: A Psycholmetric Study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 9, 179-187 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHSE.0000038174.87790.7b
  13. Prislin MD, Fitzpatrick CF, Lie D, Giglio M, Radecki S & Lewis E(1998). Use of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Evaluating Student Performance. Family Medicine, 30(5), 338-344
  14. Prislin MD, Giglio M, Lewis EM & Ahearn S(2000). Assessing the acquisition of core clinical skills through the use of serial standardized patient assessments. Academic Medicine, 75(5), 480-483 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200005000-00019
  15. Solomon DJ, Szauter K, Rosebraugh C & Callaway MR(2000). Global Ratings of Student Performance in a Standardized Patient Examination: Is the Whole More than the Sum of the Parts? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 5, 131-140 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009878124073
  16. Worth-Dicksein H, Pangaro LN, MacMillan MK, Klass DJ & Shatzer JH(2005). Use of 'standardized examinees' to screen for standardizedpatient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination. Teaching and Learning Medicine, 17(1), 9-13 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328015tlm1701_3