Healthcare Informatics Research

Korean Society of Medical Infomatics (대한의료정보학회)
권호 표지

Assessing the Quality of Internet Health Information Using DISCERN

DISCERN을 이용한 우리나라 인터넷 건강정보 질 평가

Park, Jae-Hyeon;Jo, Bi-Ryong;Kim, Yong-Ik;Sin, Yeong-Su;Kim, Yun
박재현;조비룡;김용익;신영수;김윤

  • Published : 2005.09.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate the quality of health information on the internet using DISCERN. METHODS: Breast cancer, asthma, depression, obesity were selected to be the tracer conditions of the health information. To collect information about these 4 tracer conditions, we first select top 9 popular Korean websites which provide health information in January 2004. Nine websites include 6 commercial, 3 hospital. To compare quality of internet health information provided by Korean public institute and other countries', we select Healthguide in Korea, MEDLINEplus in USA and NHS direct online in UK. Overall, a total of 45 heath information provided by 10 Korean, 2 other countries' websites were evaluated by two nurses independently using DISCERN. DISCERN is a heath information quality assessment instrument consists of sixteen five-point- scale item questionnaire. The score was compared between Korean commercial and hospital websites and between Korean public institute's website and those of USA and UK. RESULTS: Korean internet health information scored 2.0 for overall quality score. Internet health information of commercial websites scored 1.8 for overall quality score that was lower than hospital websites(2.4). Internet health information provided by Korean public institute scored 3.0 compared 3.3(MEDLINEplus) and 3.8(NHS direct online). CONCLUSION: Internet health information in Korea hardly meets DISCERN standard that means Korean health information have a problem in quality. Especially, Internet health information of commercial websites needs relatively urgent improvement in quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball MJ, Lillis J. E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2001; 61;1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(00)00130-1
  2. Ryu SW, Song TM, Ha YJ, Lee KH. Development of gateway system for internet health information. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health & Social Affairs; 2003. pp.154-212
  3. Crocco AG, Villasis KM, Jadad AR. Analysis of case of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 2002;287: 2869-2871 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2869
  4. Kim JE, Kim ES, Ko1 IS, Kang SM. An evaluation study of hypertension information providing web sites on the internet. Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2003; 9(1) :45-52
  5. Shin JH, Seo HG, Kim CH, Koh JS, Woo KH. The evaluation of scientific reliability of medical information on www in Korea through analyzing hepatitis information. Journal of Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2000; 6;73-88
  6. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Gann B, Needham G. DISCERN-an instrument for judging the quality of consumer health informaiton on treatment choices. Journal of Emidemiology and Community Health 1999;53:105-111 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.2.105
  7. Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluation the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 50: 151-155 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00124-6
  8. Rees CE, Ford JE, Sheard CEo Evaluating the reliability of DISCERN: a tool for assessing the quality of written patient information on treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns 2002;47: 273-275 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(01)00225-7
  9. Griffiths KM, Christensen H. The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the world wide web. Med J Aust 2002; 20; S97S104
  10. Charnock D. The DISCERN handbook: quality criteria for consumer health information. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press;1998. pp.1-55
  11. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:139-174
  12. Charnock D, Shepperd S. Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 2004;19(4):440-446 https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyg046
  13. Kim SY. Translating quality of life measurement tools. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1998; 19: 1034-1042
  14. Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. Searching the Internet for information on prostate cancer screening: an assessment of quality 2004; 64(1) :112-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.02.027
  15. Availabel at: httpr/Zwww.healthinsite.gov.au. Accessed May 30, 2005
  16. Availabel at: http://www.canadian-health-network.ca. Accessed May 30, 2005