Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri-based Direct-fed Microbial Supplementation for Growing-Finishing Pigs

  • Shon, K.S. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Hong, J.W. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kwon, O.S. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Min, B.J. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, W.B. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Dept. of Animal Resource and Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Park, Y.H. (Probionic, Inc.) ;
  • Lee, I.S. (Probionic, Inc.)
  • Received : 2004.03.17
  • Accepted : 2004.11.03
  • Published : 2005.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of direct-fed microbial supplementation on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in pigs. In experiment 1, forty eight pigs were used in a 42-d growth assay. There were four pigs per pen and three pens per treatment. Dietary treatments included 1) NC (without antibiotic basal diet), 2) PC (NC diet+0.1% antibiotic, 100 g/kg chlortetracycline), 3) DFM-1 (NC diet+0.2% Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus salivarius complex) and 4) DFM-2 (NC diet+0.2% Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus salivarius, Lactobacillus plantarum and Yeast complex). For the overall period, no treatment had significant effects in growth performance. In the nutrition digestibility, the pigs fed DFM diets were improved in DM and N digestibility compared with the pigs fed NC and PC diets but it was not significantly different. In experiment 2, sixty four crossbred pigs were used in a 98-d growth assay. There were four pigs per pen and four pens per treatment. Dietary treatments included 1) HND (high nutrient diet), 2) LND (low nutrient diet), 3) HND+DFM (HND diet+0.2% Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus plantarum complex) and 4) LND+DFM (LND diet+0.2% Lactobacillus reuteri and Lactobacillus plantarum complex). For overall period of growing phase, the pigs fed LND diets had improved gain/feed (p=0.01) and for overall period in the finishing phase, the pigs fed LND with DFM diets had higher ADG, ADFI and gain/feed than the others but there were no significant differences (p>0.13). In total period of growing-finishing phase, the pigs fed LND diet had higher gain/feed than the pigs fed HND diets (p<0.05). In growing phase, there were not significant differences among the treatments means for DM and N digestibility. However, the pigs fed diets with DFM had improved N digestibility (p<0.02) compared to the pigs fed diets without DFM in finishing phase. In conclusion, DFM slightly improved the growth performance in growing-finishing pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, Y. H., J. K. Kim, H. H. Kim, W. Y. Kim, Y. B. Kim and Y. H. Park. 2000. Probiotics effects of Lactobacillus reuteri BSA-131 on piglets. Kor. J. Appl. Microbial. Biotechnol. 28:8-13.
  2. Chiang, S. H. and W. M. Hsieh. 1995. Effect of direct-fed microorganisms on broiler growth performance and litter ammonia level. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 8:159-162.
  3. Fialho, E. T., M. Vassalo, J. A. F. Lima and A. G. Bertechine. 1998. Probiotics utilization for piglets from 10 to 30 kg (performance and metabolism assay). The 8th World Conference on Animal Production Contributed Papers 1:622-623.
  4. Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals - A Review. J. Appl. Bacterol. 66:365-378.
  5. Harper, A. F., E. T. Kornegay, K. L. Bryant and H. R. Thoman. 1983. Efficacy of virginiamycin and a commercially-available Lactobacillus probiotic in swine diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 8:69-76.
  6. Hong, J. W., I. H. Kim, O. S. Kwon, J. H. Kim, B. J. Min and W. B. Lee. 2002. Effects of dietary probiotics supplementation on growth performance and fecal gas emission in nursing and finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. Kor. 44:305-314.
  7. Huang, Canghai, Shiyan Qiao, Defa Li, Xiangshu Piao and Jiping Ren. 2004. Effects of Lactobacilli on the performance, diarrhea incidence, VFA conentration and gastrointestinal microbial flora of weaning pigs. Aaian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:401-409.
  8. Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaudin. 1997. Probiotics in poultry: modes of action. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 53:351-368.
  9. Kornegay, E. T. and C. R. Risley. 1996. Nutrient digestibilities of a corn-soybean meal diets as influenced by Bacillus products fed to finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 74:799-805.
  10. Kyriakis, S. C., V. K. Tsiloyiannis, J. Vlemmas, K. Sarris, A. C. Tsinas, C. Alexopoulos and L. Jansegers. 1999. The effect of probiotic LSP 122 on the control of post-weaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets. Res. Vet. Sci. 67:223-228.
  11. Kyriakis, S. C., I. Georgoulakis, A. Spais, C. Alexopoulos, C. C. Miliotis and S. K. Kritas. 2003. Evaluation of Toyocerin, a Probiotic Containing Bacillus toyoi Spores, on Health Status and Productivity of Weaned, Growing and Finishing Pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:430-434.
  12. Lyons, T. P. and J. D. Chapman. 1990. Probiotics. In: Nontraditional feed use in sources swine production. (Ed. P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood). Butterworth Publishers, MA. pp. 315-326.
  13. Mukai, T., T. Asasaka, E. Sato, K. Mori, M. Matsumoto and H. Ohori. 2002. Inhibition of binding of Helicobactor pylori to the glycolipid receptor by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri. FEMS Immun. Med. Microbiol. 32:105-110.
  14. Nousiainen, J. and J. Setala. 1993. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In: Lactic acid bacteria. (Ed. S. Salminen and A. von Wright). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York. USA.
  15. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. National Reserch Council, Academy Press.
  16. Perdigon, G., S. Alvarez, M. Rachid, G. Aguero and N. Gobbato. 1995. Immune system stimulation by probiotics. J. Dairy Sci. 78:1597-1606.
  17. Pollmann, D. S., D. M. Danielson and E. R. Peo Jr. 1980. Effects of microbial feed additives on performance of starter and growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 51:577.
  18. Shornikova, A. V., I. A. Casas, E. Isolauri, H. Mykkanen and T. Vesikari. 1997. Lactobacillus reuteri as a therapeutic agent in acute diarrhea in young children. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 24:399-404.
  19. Xuan, Z. N., J. D. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Jung, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Han, Y. Y. Kim and In K. Han. 2001. Study on the development of a probiotics complex for weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1425-1428.
  20. Yang, S. J., J. S. Hyon, C. B. Yang, S. M. Ko and H. H. Choi. 1998. Studies on the effects of feed additives fed to pigs: Effects of feeding probiotics on the growth performance and carcass quality in pigs. Kor. J. Anim. Sci. 40:21-30.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Probiotic Additions to Feed and Manure on Temperature, Humidity, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Hanwoo Manure during Summer - A Field Study vol.22, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2013.22.9.1235
  2. Comparison effects of dietary iron dextran and bacterial-iron supplementation on growth performance, fecal microbial flora, and blood profiles in sows and their litters vol.86, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12378
  3. Effects of supplementing growing-finishing pig diets with Bacillus spp. probiotic on growth performance and meat-carcass grade qualitytraits vol.45, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000300002
  4. Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation in diets with low- and high-protein content on ileal crude protein and amino acid digestibility and intestinal microbiota composition of growing pigs vol.8, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0168-2
  5. Inclusion of dietary multi-species probiotic on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality traits, faecal microbiota and diarrhoea score in growing–finishing pigs pp.1828-051X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1340097
  6. Influence of probiotics in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and blood characteristics in growing-finishing pigs vol.88, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2308
  7. Effects of Dietary Bacillus-based Probiotic on Growth Performance, Nutrients Digestibility, Blood Characteristics and Fecal Noxious Gas Content in Finishing Pigs vol.19, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.587
  8. 육성돈사료에 Lactobacillus brevis의 첨가가 성산성, 건물과 질소 소화율, 혈구수 및 분 내 악취 발생 물질에 미치는 영향 vol.48, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2006.48.4.503
  9. Global Restriction of Using Antibiotic Growth Promoters and Alternative Strategies in Poultry Production vol.101, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3184/003685018x15173975498947
  10. Effects of dietary mixture of protease and probiotics on growth performance, blood constituents, and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs vol.61, pp.5, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2019.61.5.272
  11. Supplemental Effect of Lactobacillus Plantarum on the Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Gas Emission, Excreta Microbiota, and Meat Quality in Broilers vol.23, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1514
  12. Genetic relationships between feed efficiency and gut microbiome in pig lines selected for residual feed intake vol.138, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12539
  13. Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 12: Tetracyclines: tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline vol.19, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6864
  14. Carcass and Pork Quality and Gut Environment of Pigs Fed a Diet Supplemented with the Bokashi Probiotic vol.11, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11123590