DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Additives and Fermentation Periods on Chemical Composition and In situ Digestion Kinetics of Mott Grass (Pennisetum purpureum) Silage

  • Nisa, Mahr-un (Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, University of Agriculture) ;
  • Touqir, N.A. (Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, University of Agriculture) ;
  • Sarwar, M. (Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, University of Agriculture) ;
  • Khan, M. Ajmal (Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, University of Agriculture) ;
  • Akhtar, Mumtaz (Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture)
  • Received : 2004.05.05
  • Accepted : 2004.11.13
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to see the influence of additives and fermentation periods on Mott grass silage (MGS) characteristics, its chemical composition and to compare the digestion kinetics of Mott grass (MG) and MGS in Nili buffaloes. Mott grass chopped with a locally manufactured chopper was ensiled using two additives, cane molasses and crushed corn grains each at 2, 4 and 6% of forage DM for 30 and 40 days in laboratory silos. The pH, lactic acid concentration, dry matter (DM), crude protein and fiber fractions of MGS were not affected by the type or level of additive and fermentation periods. The non-significant pH lactic acid concentration, and chemical composition of MGS indicated that the both molasses and crushed corn were utilized at similar rate for the growth of lactic acid bacteria and production of organic acids. The MG ensiled with molasses at 2% of fodder DM for 30 days was screened out for in situ digestion kinetics in Nili buffaloes. Ruminal DM and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) degradabilities of MGS were significantly (p<0.05) higher than that of MG. The DM and NDF rate of degradation, lag time and extent of degradation was nonsignificant between MGS and MG. The higher ruminal degradation of DM and NDF of MGS than MG was probably a reflection of fermentation of MG during ensilation that improved its degradability by improving the availability of easily degradable structural polysaccharides to ruminal microbial population. The results in the present study have indicated that MG ensiled with either 2% molasses or 2% crushed corn for 30 days has better nutritive value for buffalo.

Keywords

References

  1. Acosta, Y. M., C. C. Stallings, C. E. Polan and C. N. Miller. 1991. Evaluation of barley silage harvested at boot and soft dough stages. J. Dairy Sci. 74:167.
  2. Akbar, M. and R. Ullah. 1994. Adaptability of summer multi cut exotic grasses under irrigated conditions. 15th Annual Report, LPRI Bahadarnagar, Okara. pp. 87-88.
  3. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia, USA.
  4. Baker, S. B. and W. H. Summerson. 1961. The calorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. J. Biol. Chem. 138:535.
  5. Beauchemin, K. A. and L. M. Rode. 1997. Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cows diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1629.
  6. Bolsen, K. K., G. Ashbell and Z. Weinberg. 1996. Silage fermentation and silage additives- Review, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 9:483.
  7. Clark, J. H. and C. L. David. 1990. Some aspects of feeding high producing dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 68:873.
  8. Garcia, A. D., W. G. Olson, D. E. Otterby, J. G. Linn and W. P. Hansen. 1989. Effect of temperature, moisture and aeration on fermentation of alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci. 72:93.
  9. Jeon, B. T., S. H. Moon, S. M. Lee, K. H. Kim and R. H. Hudson. 2003. Voluntary intake, digestibility and nitrogen balance in spotted Deer (Cervus nippon) fed forest by-product silage, Oak leaf hay and commercial mixed ration. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(5):702.
  10. Kung, Jr., L. J. R. Robinson, N. K. Ranjit, J. H. Chen, C. M. Golt and J. D. Pesek. 2000. Microbial populations, fermentation end products, and aerobic stability of corn silage treated with ammonia or a propionic acid-based preservative. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1479.
  11. Leibensperger, R. Y. and R. E. Pitt. 1988. Modeling the effects of formic acid and molasses on ensilage. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1220.
  12. McDonald, P. 1981. The Biochemistry of Silage. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY.
  13. McDonald, P., A. R. Henderson and S. J. E. Heron. 1991. Biochemistry of Silage. (2nd Ed.) Chalcombe Publications, Marlow, UK. p. 184.
  14. Nadeau, E. M. G., D. R. Buxton, E. Lindgren and P. Lingvall. 1996. Kinetics of cell-wall digestion of orchard grass and alfalfa silages treated with cellulase and formic acid. J. Dairy Sci. 79:2207.
  15. Ruiz, T. M., W. K. Sanchez, C. R. Straples and L. E. Sollenberger. 1992. Comparison of “Mott” dwarf elephant grass silage and corn silage for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 75:533.
  16. Sarwar, M., A. Sohaib, M. A. Khan and Mahr-un-Nisa. 2003a. Effect of feeding saturated fat on milk production and composition in crossbred dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(2):204.
  17. Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and M. Nisa. 2003b. Nitrogen retention and chemical composition of urea treated wheat straw ensiled with organic acids or fermentable carbohydrates. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(11):1583.
  18. Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and M. Nisa. 2004. Influence of ruminally protected fat and urea treated corncobs on nutrient intake, digestibility, milk yield and its composition in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(1):86.
  19. Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and Z. Iqbal. 2002. Feed resources for livestock in Pakistan. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 4:186.
  20. Sarwar, M., M. U. Nisa and M. N. Saeed. 1999. Influence of nitrogen fertilization and stage of maturity of mott grass (pennisetum purpureum) on its composition, dry matter intake, ruminal characteristics and digestion kinetics in cannulated buffalo bulls. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 82:121.
  21. Sarwar, M., J. L. Firkins and M. Eastridge. 1991. Effect of replacing NDF of forage with soyhulls and corn gluten feed for dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1006.
  22. Selmer-Olsen, I., A. R. Henderson, S. Robertson and R. Mc Ginn. 1993. Cell wall degrading enzymes for silage. 1. The fermentation of enzyme treated rye grass in laboratory silos. Grass Forage Sci. 48:45.
  23. Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1984. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. (2nd Ed.) McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc. New York, USA.
  24. Van Soest, P. J., H. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Method of dietary fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal material. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583.
  25. Woolford, M. K. 1984. The Silage Fermentation. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.
  26. Yahaya, M. S., A. Kimura, J. Harai, H. V. Nguyen, M. Kawai, J. Takahashi and S. Matsuoka. 2001. Evaluation of structural carbohydrates losses and digestibility in alfalfa and orchard grass during ensiling. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1701.
  27. Yahaya, M. S., M. Goto, W. Yimiti, B. Smerjai and Y. Kawamoto. 2004. Evaluation of fermentation quality of a tropical and temperate forage crops ensiled with additives of fermented juice epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (FJLB). Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(6): 942. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.942
  28. Yokota, H., J. H. Kim, T. Okajima and M. Ohshima. 1992. Nutritional quality of wilted napier grass ensiled with or without molasses. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 5:673.
  29. Yunus, M., N. Ohba, M. Furuse and Y. Masuda. 2000. Effects of adding urea and molasses on Napier grass silage quality. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1542.

Cited by

  1. Chemical Composition, In situ Digestion Kinetics and Feeding Value of Oat Grass (Avena sativa) Ensiled with Molasses for Nili-Ravi Buffaloes vol.19, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1127
  2. Influence of Corn Steep Liquor on Feeding Value of Urea Treated Wheat Straw in Buffaloes Fed at Restricted Diets vol.19, pp.11, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1610
  3. Chemical Composition, Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Panicum antidotale and Pennisetum orientale for Nili Buffaloes at Different Clipping Intervals vol.19, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.176
  4. Influence of Re-growth Interval on Chemical Composition, Herbage Yield, Digestibility and Digestion Kinetics of Setaria sphacelata and Cenchrus ciliaris in Buffaloes vol.19, pp.3, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.381
  5. Feeding Value of Urea Treated Wheat Straw Ensiled with or without Acidified Molasses in Nili-Ravi Buffaloes vol.19, pp.5, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.645
  6. Estimation of Ruminal Degradation and Intestinal Digestion of Tropical Protein Resources Using the Nylon Bag Technique and the Three-step In vitro Procedure in Dairy Cattle on Rice Straw Diets vol.20, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1849
  7. Feeding Value of Jambo Grass Silage and Mott Grass Silage for Lactating Nili Buffaloes vol.20, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.523
  8. Influence of Varying Dry Matter and Molasses Levels on Berseem and Lucerne Silage Characteristics and Their In situ Digestion Kinetics in Nili Buffalo Bulls vol.20, pp.6, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.887
  9. Ruminal Characteristics, Blood pH, Blood Urea Nitrogen and Nitrogen Balance in Nili-ravi Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Bulls Fed Diets Containing Various Levels of Ruminally Degradable Protein vol.21, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70025
  10. Nutritional Management for Buffalo Production vol.22, pp.7, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.r.09