Comparison of Shipyard Worker Self-reported and Expert-observed Method using the Same Checklist for Ergonomic Risk Factors

근골격계질환 위험요인에 대한 조선업 근로자 자가평가와 전문가 관찰 방법 비교

  • Lee, Yun-Keun (Wonjin Institute For Occupational and Environmetal Health)
  • Received : 2005.03.09
  • Accepted : 2005.06.23
  • Published : 2005.08.26

Abstract

This study aims to compare a self-reported and expert-observed method on ergonomic risk factors of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). The checklist was developed based on the results of previous studies, and the symptoms of WMSDs were obtained using a self-reported questionnaire from 1,029 shipyard workers. The risk factors were assessed through the self-report by workers and video analysis by ergonomists. The symptom prevalence at the low back (59.2%), shoulders (50.8 %), and knees (49.7%) were relatively higher than those at other body parts. Odds ratios (ORs) by body parts were 2.48 to 2.90 for the risk job, and the ORs were significantly different from those of the low risk job. The risk factor scores by body parts between workers and ergonomist were very high correlation(r=0.82 to 0.92). The rates of self-report from risk job were 54.0% (elbow and arm) to 72.1 % (low back), but sometimes overestimated(105.7 to 122.6%) than those by ergonomists. The checklist, developed in this study, will be an efficient tool for the evaluation of risk jobs using self-report by workers.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽현석. 자동차 조립라인에서의 인간 공학적 위험요인 평가에 관한 연구[석사학위논문]. 서울대학교 보건대학원; 1999.pp.1-30
  2. 노동부. 2003 산업재해 원인 분석. 노동부; 2004
  3. 이윤근, 김현욱, 임상혁, 박희석, 누적외상성질환 위험요인의 정량적 평가 및 관리를 위한 점검표 개발. 한국산업위생학회지 2001;11(1):56-69
  4. Americzan National Standards Institute. Control of work-related cumulative trauma disorders, Part 1, Upper extremities(working draft). National Safety Council; 1996. pp. 4.1-A. 17
  5. David L, Nordstrom. Comparison of selfreported and expert-observed physical activities at work in a gened population. Am J Ind Med 1998;34:29-35 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199807)34:1<29::AID-AJIM5>3.0.CO;2-L
  6. Erdil M, Dckenon OB. Cumulative trauma disorders, preventive, evaluation and treatment. Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1997. pp. 88-89
  7. Humantech Inc. Applied ergonomics training manual, 2nd edition. Humantech Inc. ; 1995. pp. 66-80
  8. Karhu O , Knasi P, Kuonnka I. Correcting working postures in industry, a practical method for analysis. Appl Ergo 1977;8: 199-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
  9. Kilbom A. Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders-What information can be obtained from systematic observation? Scand J Work Envir Hlth 1994;20:30-45
  10. McAtamney L, Corlett EN. RULA : a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper lunb disorders. Appl Ergo 1993;24(2):91-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
  11. Moore JS, Garg A. The strain index: A proposed mthcd to analyze jobs for risk of distal upper extremity disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1995;56(5):443-458 https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119591016863
  12. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Hazard evaluation and technical assistance report, HETA 89- 250-2046. Cincinnati, OH, Newsday Inc.; 1990
  13. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors -A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for workrelated muxuloskeletal disordersof the neck, upper extremity, and low back. 2nd edition. Center for Disease Control and Prvention; 1997
  14. Occupational Safety and Health Adminstation. Draft Ergonomic Standard, OSHA, 1995
  15. Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration. Federal register Vol64, No. 225, Ergonomics Program, OSHA; 1999. pp. 65875-65896
  16. Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration. Nonfatal occupational illnesses by category of illness, private industry, U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2005
  17. ViiKari- Juntura E, Rauas S, Martolaonen R , Kuosma E, Riihimarki H, Takala E-P, Saarenmaa K. Validith of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Envir Health 1996;22:251-259 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.139