Effect on Active Exercise Programs in Employees with Chronic Low Back Pain

만성 요통근로자의 능동적 운동프로그램 효과

Hur, Jin-Gang;Song, Jae-Cheol;Roh, Young-Man;Park, Dong-Sik;Yang, Young-Ae;Kim, Yoon-Shin
허진강;송재철;노영만;박동식;양영애;김윤신

  • Published : 20050300

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relative efficacy of three active exercise programs for work-related, chronic low back pain, and to observe to what extent the programs affected the mechanical stability of the lumbar region. Methods: The subjects were 64 employees who were randomly divided into three groups to match the three active exercise programs which were performed 3 times a week for 6 months. All subjects were assessed with the same measurements at a pre-study examination, and then were reassessed at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after the study. Results: The pain intensity didn’t show any significant difference among the three groups. However, the Oswestry Disability Index showed significant differences among the three groups at 6 months and the lumbar and thoracic exercise groups showed significant decreases compared to the general physiotherapy group (p<0.05). Maximal stretching with both hands in the overhead direction showed a significant difference among the three groups at 3 months and 6 months, and the thoracic exercise group at 6 months showed a significant increase in overhead stretching compared to the lumbar exercise and general physiotherapy groups (p<0.05). The lumbar region angle of inclination showed significant differences among the three groups at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, with the thoracic exercise group being decreased significantly more than the lumbar exercise and general physiotherapy groups at 6 months (p<0.05). Conclusions: Exercise aimed at increasing thoracic mobility has an effect on lumbar stability. Furthermore, it is far more effective for lumbar stabilization than general physiotherapy and deep muscle strengthening lumbar exercise.

목적: 본 연구는 만성 요통근로자의 세 가지 능동적 운동프로그램 효과에 관한 연구로서 능동적 운동이 요추의 안정성 향상에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 시도되었다. 방법: 3개월 이상 만성요통을 호소하는 64명의 근로자 대상으로 무작위로 일반적인 물리치료그룹, 요추 운동그룹, 흉추 운동그룹, 세 그룹으로 나누었다. 능동적 운동프로그램은 주 3회, 6개월 동안 실시하였으며, 통증강도, Oswestry 장애지수, 양손을 머리위로 최대한 올려 높이측정, 요추부 경사각도를 평가하였다. 모든 대상자들은 연구 전, 연구 후 2주, 3개월, 6개월을 같은 측정방법으로 재평가하였다. 결과: 통증강도는 세 그룹 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. Oswestry 장애지수는 연구 후 6개월에서 세 그룹 간에 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 요추운동그룹과 흉추운동그룹이 일반적인 물리치료그룹에 비하여 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.05). 양손을 머리위로 최대한 올려 높이측정은 연구 후 3개월과 6개월에서 세 그룹 간에 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 연구 후 6개월에서는 흉추운동그룹이 일반적인 물리치료그룹과 요추운동그룹에 비하여 유의하게 증가하였다(p<0.05). 요추부 경사각도는 연구 후 2주와 3개월, 6개월에서 세 그룹 간에 유의한 차이가 있었으며, 연구 후 6개월에서는 흉추운동그룹이 일반적인 물리치료그룹과 요추운동그룹에 비하여 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.05). 결론: 3개월 이상 만성 요통을 호소하는 근로자 대상으로 흉추의 운동성 증가를 위한 운동프로그램을 적용하여 흉추의 운동성을 증가시킨 결과에서 보면, 2주 시행하였을 때 요추의 신전 운동프로그램 보다 요추의 안정성 향상에 효과적이며, 6개월 시행하였을 때만, 요추의 심부근근력강화 운동프로그램보다 요추의 안정성 향상에 효과적이었다. Oswestry 장애지수는 요추의 심부근 근력강화 운동프로그램과 동일하게 감소하였고, 통증강도는 세 그룹 모두 2주 시행하였을 때 감소하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 노동부. 노동백서 2003년판. 노동부, 서울. 2003
  2. 양영애, 김영희, 김용권, 허진강, 송재철, 김윤신. VDT 작업자에 대한 흉추 운동프로그램의 통증감소 및 유연성 증가 효과에 관한 연구. 대한산업의학학회지 2004;16(3):250-61
  3. 유정임, 구정완. 방사선 방어용 앞치마를 착용하는 방사선 관련 종사자들의 근골격계 증상호소와 관련요인. 대한 산업의학 학회지 2004;16(2):166-77
  4. McKenzie R. 요통의 예방과 치료. 현문사, 서울. 1992. pp56-60
  5. Biering-Sorensen F. Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one year period. Spine 1984;9(2):109-19
  6. Borenstein DG. Epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of low back pain. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2001;13(2):128-34 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002281-200103000-00006
  7. Brodie DJ, Burnett JV, Walker JM, Lydes-Reid D. Evaluation of low back pain by patient questionnaires and therapist assessment. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990;11: 519-29 https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1990.11.11.519
  8. Chaffin DB, Herrin GD, Gary DH, Keyserling WH. Preemployment strenth testing-an updated position. J Occup Med 1978;20(6) :403-8
  9. Denner A. The trainability of the trunk and neck musculature of deconditioned back pain patients. Manuelle Med 1999;37:34-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s003370050102
  10. Edmondston SJ, Singer KP. Thoracic Spine: anatomical and biomechanical considerations for manual therapy. Man Ther 1997;2(3):132-43 https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1997.0293
  11. Erdil M, Dickerson OB, Glackin E. Diagnosis and medical management of work related low back pain. In drdil M, Dickerson OB, ed. Cumulative trauma disorders; Prevention, evaluation, and treatment. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New york, 1997. pp621-51
  12. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66(8):217-73
  13. Fon GT, Pitt MJ, Theis AC Jr. Thoracic kyphosis: range in normal subjects. Am J Roentgenol 1980;134(5):979-83 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.134.5.979
  14. Frymoyer JW. Back pain and sciatica. New Engl J Med 1988;318(5):291-300 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198802043180506
  15. Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidence and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22(2):263-71
  16. Grant R. Physical therapy of the cervical and thoracic spine, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 2002. pp379-80
  17. Hazard RG. Chronic low back pain and disability: The efficacy of functional restoration. Bull Hosp jt Dis 1996;55(4):213-6
  18. Hemberg S. Introduction to occupational epidemiology. Michigan Lewis Publisher Inc. 1992. pp 5-7
  19. Janda V. Muscle weakness and inhibition (pseudoparesis) in back pain Syndroms. In: Grieve GP, editor. Modern manual therapy of the vertebral column. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1986. pp197-201
  20. Kaltenborn FM: Manual mobilization of the joints, 5th ed. Olaf Norlis Bokhandel, Oslo, 1999. pp167
  21. Kankaanpaa M, Taimela S, Airaksinen O, Hanninen O. The efficacy of active rehabilitation in chronic low back pain. Effect on pain intensity, self-experienced disability and lumbar fatigability. Spine 1999;24(10):1034-42 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199905150-00019
  22. Keel KD. The pain chart. Lancet 1948;2:6-8
  23. Kelsey JL, White AA 3rd. Epidemiology and impact of lowback pain. Spine 1980;5(2):133-42 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198003000-00007
  24. Luoto S, Aalto H, Taimela S. One-footed and externally disturbed two-footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects. A controlled study with followup. Spine 1998;23(19):2081-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199810010-00008
  25. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Karbo H, Abildstrup S, Fischer-Nielsen K, Krebs R, Ibsen K. Intensive dynamic back exercises with or without hyperextension in chronic back pain after surgery for lumbar disc protrusion: A clinical trial. Spine 1993;18(5):560-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199304000-00007
  26. Mannion AF, Taimela S, Muntener M, Dvorak J. Active therapy for chronic low back pain part I. Effects on back muscle activation, fatigability, and strength. Spine 2001;26(8): 897-908 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104150-00013
  27. Mcdowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scale the questionnaires. Oxford University Press Inc, 1987. pp239-41
  28. Molumphy M, Unger B, Jensen GM, Lopopolo RB. Incidence of work-related low back pain in physical therapists. Phys Ther 1985;65(4):482-6 https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.4.482
  29. Moore KL. Muscles and ligaments of the back. In: Singer KP, Giles LG, eds. Clinical anatomy and management of low back pain. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1997 pp156-64
  30. Nachemson AL. Advances in low-back pain. Clin Orthop 1985;200:266-278
  31. Nies N, Sinnot PL. Variations in balance and body sway in middle aged adults. Spine 1991;16(3):325-30 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103000-00012
  32. O'Sullivan PB, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis. Spine 1997;22(24):2959-67 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199712150-00020
  33. Panjabi MM, Lydon C, Vasavada A, Grob D, Crisco JJ 3rd, Dvorak J. On the understanding of clinical instability. Spine 1994;19(23) :2643-50
  34. Panjabi MM. The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I: Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 1992;5(4):383-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199212000-00001
  35. Singer KP, Giles LG. Manual therapy considerations at the thoracolumbar junction: an anatomical and functional perspective. J manipulative physiol ther 1990; 13(2):83-8
  36. Skovron ML, Szpalski M, Nordin M, Melot C and Cukier D. Sociocultural factors and back pain. A population based study in Belgian adults. Spine 1994;19(2): 129-37 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199401001-00002
  37. Svensson HO, Anderson GB. The relationship of low back pain, work history, work environment, and stress. A retrospective cross-sectional study of 38-to 64-year-old women. Spine 1989;14(5):517-22 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198905000-00008
  38. Thue L. Rehabilitation training. Thue/Gloek, Kreischa, 1997. pp5-6
  39. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Conservative treatment of acute and chronic nonspecific low back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of the most common interventions. Spine 1997;22 (18):2128-56 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709150-00012
  40. Voss DE, Ionta MK, Myers BJ. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Harpar & Row, Philadelphia, 1985. pp315-9
  41. Walsh K, Cruddas M, Coggon D. Interaction of height and mchanical loading of the spine in the development of lowback pain. Scand J Work Environ Health 1991;17(6):420-4 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1680