Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

Relation Among Sociometric Popularity, Perceived Popularity and Aggression in Adolescence

청소년의 사회측정적 인기도 및 지각된 인기도와 공격성과의 관계

  • Do, Kum-Hae (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, Kyungpook National Univ.) ;
  • Choi, Bo-Ga (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, Kyungpook National Univ.) ;
  • Lee, Ji-Min (Dept. of Child & Family Studies, Kyungpook National Univ.)
  • 도금혜 (경북대학교 아동가족학과) ;
  • 최보가 (경북대학교 아동가족학과) ;
  • 이지민 (경북대학교 아동가족학과)
  • Published : 2005.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between sociometric popularity (like-most nomination and like-least nomination) and perceived popularity (most-popular nomination and least-popular nomination ) and to examine the relationships between adolescent aggression (overt, relational, and not prosocial behavior) and each of the popularities. The 377 subjects were selected from first and second graders of middle and high schools. The results of this study were as follows: 1) Sociometric popularity is significantly correlated with least-popular nomination, but not with most-popular nomination. 2) Adolescent aggression is negatively correlated with socimetric popularity, but positively associated with perceived popularity. 3) Sociometric popularity is negatively associated with aggression for only girls, but perceived popularity is positively associated with aggression for both boys and girls. 4) Sociometric popularity is negatively associated with aggression for only middle school students, but perceived popularity is positively associated with aggression for both middle and high students.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명희(1990). 학급내의 인기아와 고립아의 행동 특성 차이 분석 연구. 홍익대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  2. 김윤경(1997). 인기. 무시. 배척 집단의 사회 기술 및 부모 양육 태도에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문
  3. 김효정(1999). 청소년의 공격성 유형에 따른 심리적 특성 연구. 고려대학교 석사학위논문
  4. 류정임(2000). 감정조망수용능력 및 친사회적 행동과 유아의 인기도와의 관계. 아동교육, 9(2), 173-185
  5. 문수진(1999). 인기도 및 인지양식과 자아존중감의 관계. 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  6. 문혁준(2000), 또래수용도와 부모양육태도: 인기아 와 고립아를 중심으로. 대한가정학회지, 38(7), 39-51
  7. 서남서(1996). 초 중등학생의 인기도와 자아개념간의 관계 연구. 서울여자대학교 석사학위논문
  8. 송미선(2001). 또래 갈등상황에서 유아의 전략, 사회적 행동 특성. 그리고 또래 수용도와의 관계, 아동학회지, 22(3). 229-239
  9. 송혜영 (2002). 또래 갈등상황에서 아동의 책략, 목표 및 또래 수용. 경북대학교 석사학위논문
  10. 윤재원(1997). 인기아와 비인기아의 형성요인 연구. 인하대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  11. 이경미(1992). 유아의 인기도와 조망수용능력과의 관계에 대한 연구. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  12. 이경희, 오경자(1998). 관계지향 공격성 및 외현화 공격성과 심리사회적 적응간의 관계. 한국심리학회,1998년도 연차 학술대회 학술발표 논문집, 173-187
  13. 이사임(1994). 또래간 인기도와 놀이형태 및 놀이행동. 이화여대 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  14. 이 숙, 정미자(1995). 아동의 또래 수용도 및 관련 변인. 대한가정학회지, 33(2), 103-112
  15. 이은주(2001). 공격적 행동의 유형 및 성별에 따른 집단 괴롭힘 가해아동과 피해아동의 또래관계 비교. 아동학회지, 22(2), 167-180
  16. 이은해(1997). 아동연구방법. 교문사
  17. 임지영(1997). 또래괴롭힘이 아동의 외로움과 불안에 미치는 영향. 경북대학교 석사학위논문
  18. 정옥분(1998). 청년 발달의 이해. 학지사
  19. 정태연. 김은정. 김인경(2000). 공격성 지각에 대한 대인관계적 분석: 가해집단과 피해집단을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 13(2). 79-98
  20. 최진희(1999) 또래 거명에 의한 인기아와 비인기아의 자아개념 및 대인관계 성향의 차이. 연세 대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  21. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1995). Dynamics of inclusion and exclusions in preadolescent cliques. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 145-162 https://doi.org/10.2307/2787039
  22. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press
  23. Cillessen, ljzendoom, Lieshout & Hartup (1992)
  24. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon(Series Ed.) and N.Eisenberg(Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3, Social emotional and personality devrlopment(5th edition. pp. 779862). NY: Wiley
  25. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimension and types of social status: Across age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
  26. Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of overt aggression, relation aggression, feelings of distress, and provocation type. Development & Psychopathology, 7,313-322 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400006520
  27. Crick, N. R, & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996). Relational Aggression, Overt Aggression and Friendship. Child Development, 67, 2328-2338 https://doi.org/10.2307/1131626
  28. Dodge, K. A, Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. R, & Price, J. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boy's groups: Developmental and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61, 1289-1309 https://doi.org/10.2307/1130743
  29. Eder, D. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154-165 https://doi.org/10.2307/2112416
  30. Eder, D., Evans, C. C, & Parker, S. (1995). Schooltalk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ : Rutgers University Press
  31. Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A, & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer Experience: Common and Unique Features of Number of Friendship, Social Network Centrality, and Sociometric Status. Social Development, 10(1), 23-40 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00146
  32. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In P.H.Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol.4 : Socialization, personality, and social development New York Wiley
  33. Hess, L. E., & Atkins, M. S. (1998). Victims and aggressors at school: Teachers, self, and peer perceptions of psychosocial functioning. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 75-89 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0202_2
  34. Lease, A M., Kennedy, C. A, & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Children's Social Constructions of Popularity. Social Development, 11(1),87-109 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00188
  35. Luthar, S. S., & McMahon, T. J. (1996). Peer reputation among inner-city adolescents: Structure and correlate. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 581-603
  36. Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meaness : Popularity, competition, and conflict among jounior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175-191 https://doi.org/10.2307/2673207
  37. Michell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 1861-1869 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00295-X
  38. Musgrove, K. T., Lease, A. M., & Axelrod J. L. (2002). Dimensions of Social Status Preadolescent Peer Groups : Likability, Perceived Popularity, and Social Dominance. Social Development, 11(4), 508-533 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00213
  39. Newcomb A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pettee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A metaanalytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.99
  40. Parker, J. G., & Gottman J. M. (1989). Social and emotional development in a relational context. In T.J. Berndt & G.W. Ladd(Eds.), Peer relationships in child development(pp.95-131). New York: Wiley
  41. Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1988). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity : Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 125-144
  42. Rodkin, P. C. Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R, & Acker, R V. (2000). Heterogeneity of Popular Boys: Antisocial and Prosocial Configuration, Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14-24 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14
  43. Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W' & Parker, J, G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships and group. In W, Damon(Series Ed.) and N.Eisenberg(Vol. Ed), Handbook of child psychology. Vol.3: Social emotional and personality development(5th edition. pp, 619-700). New York: Wiley
  44. Salmivalli, C., Kaukiainen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. (2000), Aggression and sociometric status among peers: Do gender and type of aggression matter? Scandinavian joirnal of Psychology, 41, 17-24 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00166
  45. Tracy, V. (2000), Competing for hegemony during adolescence a link between aggression and social status. The University of British Columbia Press