Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

An Integrated Theoretical Structure of Mental Models: Toward Understanding How Students Form Their Ideas about Science

  • Published : 2005.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

When modeling students' conceptual understanding, there are several different frameworks, among which are the alternative conception framework and the mental model framework, which converge to suggest a form of knowledge representation. However, little research has explained how they are different from each other and from memory. The purpose of this study was to develop a new mental model theory that integrates the different terminologies and their background theories, which refer to students' ideas not only in science education, but also in other research areas. For this purpose, at first, we compared different terminologies including alternative conception, p-prim, and mental models, and the underlying theories used for representing students' ideas in learning science. Through such comparison, we tried to find the relationship among them. We reviewed related literature and synthesized the results from both cognitive science (related research areas) and science education approaches, especially, Vosniadou's mental model theory. Based on reviewing previous studies, we have developed a preliminary mental model theory 'an integrated theoretical structure of mental models'. We applied the new mental model theory to interpret data on students' ideas about circular motion from our previous research. We expect our new mental model theory will help us understand how students form their own ideas in science from an integrated perspective.

Keywords

References

  1. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161-186 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
  2. Boekaerts, M. (2002). Bringing about change in the classroom: Strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach-EARLI presidential address, 2001. Learning and Instruction, 12, 589-604 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00010-5
  3. Borges, A. T., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 95-117 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290859
  4. Como, L., & Kanfer, R. (1993). The role of volition in learning and performance. Review of Research in Education, 19, 301-341
  5. Como, L., & Randi, J. (1999). A design theory for classroom instruction in self-regulated learning? In: C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. II, pp. 293-318). lEA. Hillsdale, New Jersey
  6. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105-225 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1002&3_2
  7. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What change in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1155-1191 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201002
  8. diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why conceptual ecology is a good idea. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), 'Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice' (pp. 29-60). Dordrecht: Kluwer
  9. Duit, R. (1991). Students' Conceptual frameworks: Consequences for Learning Science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, (pp. 65-85). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  10. Duit, R. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 671-688x https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
  11. Franco, C., Barros, H. L., Colinvaux, D. Krapas, S., Queiroz, G., & Alves, F. (1999). From scientists' and inventors' minds to some scientific and technological products: Relationships between theories, models, mental models and conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 277-291 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290705
  12. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  13. Kuhl, J. (1985). Volitional mediators of cognition-behavior consistency: Self-regulator processes and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, (pp. 101-128). New York: Springer-Verlag
  14. Lee, G., Kim, Y., & Bao, L. (2004). Another cognitive conflict in learning physics: When VE is consistent with a student's answer' in AAPT Announcer 33(4), 97
  15. Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students' knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, (pp. 110-128). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel
  16. MacIsaac, D. (2004). Mental models or pieces of knowledge: Impetus theory in university students' understanding of force, A paper presented at 2004 NARST annual Meeting (Vancouver, BC)
  17. Mishra, P., & Brewer, W. F. (2003). Theories as a form of mental representation and their role in the recall of text information. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 277-303 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00040-1
  18. Ormrod, J. E. (1999). Human learning, (pp. 188-195). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill/Prentice Hall
  19. Park, J., & Lee, G. (2004). Understanding students' conceptions in the research on conceptual change in science: from misconception to mental model. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24, 621-637
  20. Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography: Students' alternative frameworks and science education (3rd Ed.). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel
  21. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167-200 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
  22. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on Conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniado, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, (pp. 33-50). Oxford: Pergamon
  23. Pintrich, P. R., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Future directions for theory and research on intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional Conceptual Change, (pp. 429-441). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  24. Redish, E. F. (2004). A theoretical framework for physics education research: Modeling student thinking. The Proceeding of Enrico Fermi Summer School in Physics
  25. Rickheit, G., & Sichelschmidt, L. (1999). 'Mental models: Some answers, some questions, some suggestions' In G. Rickheit & C. Habel (Eds.), Mental Models in Discourse Processing and Reasoning, (pp. 9-40). North-Holland: Elsevier
  26. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
  27. Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: Sate of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniado, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New Perspectives on Conceptual Change, (pp. 3-13). Oxford: Pergamon
  28. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585 https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(92)90018-W
  29. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18, 123-183 https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(94)90022-1
  30. Wandersee. J.,Mintzes. J., & Novak. J. (1994). 'Research on alternative conceptions in Science'. In D. L. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning, (pp.177-210). NY: Macmilan
  31. Westen, D. (1999). Psychology: Mind, brain, & culture, NY: Johnson Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp. 294
  32. Yates, J. (1985). The content of awareness is a model of the world. Psychological Review, 92, 249-284 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.249
  33. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum