The Usefulness of Concomitant High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test and Colposcopy in Combination with the Papanicolaou Test in ASCUS Patients

ASCUS 환자에서 고위험 사람유두종바이러스 검사와 자궁경검사의 유용성

  • Kim, Min-Kyung (Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Sohn, Jin-Hee (Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, College of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Chul-Hwan (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Korea University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Sang (Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Korea University)
  • 김민경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 병리과) ;
  • 손진희 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 병리과) ;
  • 김철환 (고려대학교 의과대학 병리학교실) ;
  • 최종상 (고려대학교 의과대학 병리학교실)
  • Published : 2005.05.31

Abstract

The objective of this study was to ascertain whether or not the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) test, when coupled with Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, would prove useful in the screening and management of patients in whom abnormal Pap smear results had been obtained. Concomitant high-risk HPV detection using the hybrid capture II test and colposcopy with a Pap smear were performed with 176 patients, all of whom had been screened for both cervical carcinoma and precancerous lesions. We concomitantly performed colposcopies on these patients. Upon the follow-ups, the histologic diagnoses of these patients were confirmed via either biopsy or hysterectomy. The rate of high-risk HPV detection was correlated with cytologic diagnoses and colposcopic findings. The group composed of the high-risk HPV-positive ASCUS patients exhibited a 55.7% rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), a significantly higher rate than the 7.5% result obtained in the high-risk HPV-negative ASCUS group. HPV test showed high sensitivity (87%) and low specificity (62.6%) in detection of CIN and colposcopy also showed high sensitivity (88%) and low specificity (22%). Any combination of these tests improve sensitivity, but not specificity. High-risk HPV tests, when coupled with Pap smears, constituted a useful triage approach with regard to colposcopy-directed biopsies in patients in whom a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS had been rendered.

Keywords

References

  1. Davey DD, Nielsen ML, Naryshkin S, Robb JA, Cohen T, Kline TS. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: current laboratory practice of participants in the College of American Pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1996; 120:440-4
  2. Davey DD, Naryshkin S, Nielsen ML, Robb JA, Kline TS. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors. Diagn Cytapathol 1994; 11 :390-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840110416
  3. Genest DR, Dean B, Lee KR, Sheets E, Crurn CP, Cibas ES. Qualifying a cytologic diagnosis of 'atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance' affects the predictive value of a squamous intraepithelial lesion on subsequent biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:338-41
  4. Selvaggi SM, Haefner HK. Reporting of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on cervical smears: is it significant? Diagn Cytapathol 1995;13:352-6 https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.2840130418
  5. Williams ML, Rimm DL, Pedigo MA, Frable WJ. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: correlative histologic and follow-up studies from an academic medical center. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;15:288-91 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199611)15:4<288::AID-DC7>3.0.CO;2-A
  6. Duggan MA, Brasher PMA. Accuracy of Pap tests reported as CIN I. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:129-36 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199908)21:2<129::AID-DC10>3.0.CO;2-M
  7. Bosch FX, Manos MM, Munoz N, et al. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in cervical cancer: a worldwide perspective. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:796-802 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/87.11.796
  8. The atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions triage study (ALTS) Group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:397-402 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.5.397