IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY OF OSTEOPONTIN EXPRESSION IN THE DISTRACTED BONE AFTER CANINE MANDIBULAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS

성견 하악골 신장술 후 신생골조직에서 Osteopontin 발현에 대한 연구

  • Byun, June-Ho (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Institute of Health Science, Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Bong-Wook (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Institute of Health Science, Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Sung, Iel-Yong (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, Ulsan University) ;
  • Cho, Yeong-Cheol (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Medicine, Ulsan University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Ryoul (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 변준호 (경상대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실, 경상대학교 건강과학연구원, 경상대학교 생명과학연구원) ;
  • 박봉욱 (경상대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실, 경상대학교 건강과학연구원, 경상대학교 생명과학연구원) ;
  • 성일용 (울산대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 조영철 (울산대학교 의과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김종렬 (부산대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.10.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed at evaluating the histological changes of new bone and expression of osteopontin (OPN) after mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Materials and Methods: Unilateral mandibular distraction (0.5 mm twice per day for 10 days) was performed in eight adult dogs. Two animals were sacrificed at 7, 14, 28 and 56 days after completion of distraction, respectively. The distracted bones and contralateral non-distracted control bones were harvested and processed for histological and immunohistochemical examinations. Results: The new bone was arranged to tension direction after distraction osteogenesis. 7 days after distraction, numerous osteoblasts lining the immature trabecular bone and fibroblast-like cells in the fibrous intrezone were observed. 14 days after distraction, the new formed trabecular bones were thickened compared with 7 days after distraction. 28 days after distraction, the fibrous interzone was almost filled with newly calcified bone, and it was more hardened at 56 days after distraction. Increased OPN signals detected in the osteoblasts lining the trabecular bone and fibroblast-like cells in the fibrous interzone at 7 and 14 days after distraction. At 28 days after distraction, the OPN was weakly expressed in the osteoblasts, and it was not detected in all cellular components of distracted bone at 56 days later of distraction. Conclusions: After distraction osteogenesis, the distracted zone was completely calcified during the 56 days of consolidation period. In this study, the staining intensity of OPN increased in the osteoblasts and fibroblast-like cells at 7 and 14 days after distraction. The expression pattern of this protein shown here suggested that OPN play an important role in the osteogenesis during the early consolidation period.

Keywords

References

  1. Ilizarov GA: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop 1989;238:249-281
  2. Ilizarov GA: The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989;239:263-285
  3. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Browne EZ: Mandibular lengthening in the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51:506-508 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  4. Karp NS, Thorne CHM, McCarthy JG, Sisson HA: Bone lengthening in the craniofacial skeleton. Ann Plast Surg 1990;24:231-237 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199003000-00007
  5. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp NS, Thorne CHM, Grayson BH: Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199289010-00001
  6. Aqerreta JD, Forriol F, Canadell J: Complications of bone lengthening. Int Orthop 1994;18:299-303
  7. Fang TD, Nacamuli RP, Song HM, Fong KD, Warren SM, Salim A, Carano RA, Filvaroff EH, Longaker MT: Creation and characterization of a mouse model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Bone 2004;34:1004-1012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.02.011
  8. 강대실, 지유진, 송현철: 가토 하악골에서 신연 골형성술시 제I형 및 II형 교원질의 발현. 대구외지 2004;30:261-270
  9. Kasugai S, Todescan R, Nagata T, Yao KL, Butler WT, Sodek J: Expression of bone matrix proteins associated with mineralized tissue formation by adult rat bone marrow cells in vitro: inductive effects or dexamethasone in the osteoblast phenotype. J Cell Physiol 2003;147:111-120 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041470115
  10. Chen J, Shapiro HS, Sodek J: Developmental expression of bone sialoprotein mRNA in rat mineralized connective tissues. J Bone Mineral Res 1992;7:987-997 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070816
  11. Goldenberg A, Warner KJ, Li MC, Hunter GK: Binding of bone sialoprotein, osteopontin and synthetic polypeptides to hydroxyapatite. Connect Tissue Res 2001;42:25-37 https://doi.org/10.3109/03008200109014246
  12. 임순모, 안병근, 박영주, 박희건, 박준우, 이건주: 성견 하악골체부 신장시 신장부위의 증식세포핵항원과 제I형 교원질 발현에 관한 연구. 대구외지 2001;27:385-393
  13. 백선호, 안병근, 박영주, 박희건, 박준우, 이건주, 이용찬, 조병욱: 성견 하악골 절단 후 기계적 골 견인에 의해 형성된 골 신장부에 대한 시기별 조직학적 변화. 대구외지 2001;27:404-414
  14. 김동준, 지유진, 송현철: 가토 하악골에서 신연 골형성술시 osteonectin의 발현. 대구외지 2004;30:391-399
  15. Tavakoli T, Yu Y, Shahidi S, Bonar F, Walsh WR, Poole MD: Expression of growth factors in the mandibular distraction zone: a sheep study. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:434-439 https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3157
  16. Hu J, Zou S, Li J, Chen Y, Wang D, Gao Z: Temporospatial expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor duringmandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 2003;31:238-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(03)00034-9
  17. Park BW, Kim JR, Lee JH, Byun JH: Expression of nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor in the inferior alveolar nerve after distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:624-630 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.019
  18. Perrien DS, Brown EC, Aronson J, Skinner RA, Montague DC, Badger TM, Lumpkin CK Jr: Immunohistochemical study of osteopontin expression during distraction osteogenesis in the rat. J Histochem Cytochem 2002;50:567-574 https://doi.org/10.1177/002215540205000414
  19. Pacicca DM, Patel N, Lee C, Salisbury K, Lehmann W, Carvalho R, Gerstenfeld LC, Einhorn TA: Expression of angiogenic factors during distraction osteogenesis. Bone 2003;33:889-898 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.06.002
  20. Bouletreau PJ, Warren SM, Longaker MT: The molecular biology of distraction osteogenesis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002;30:1-11 https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0263
  21. Nomura S, Wills AJ, Edwards DR, Heath JK, Hogan BL: Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J Cell Biol 1988;106:441-450 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.106.2.441
  22. Chen J, Singh K, Mukherjee BB, Sodek J: Developmental expression of bone sialoprotein mRNA in rat mineralised connective tissue. Matrix 1993;13:113-123 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0934-8832(11)80070-3
  23. Gordjestani M, Dermaut L, De Ridder L, Thierens H, De Waele P, De Leersnijder Willy W, Bosman F: Osteopontin and bone metabolism: a histology and scintiraphy study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:794-799 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2005.04.013
  24. Nomura S, Takano-Yamamoto T: Molecular events caused by mechanical stress in bone. Matrix Biol 2000;19:91-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00050-0
  25. Huang W, Carlsen B, Rudkin G, Berry M, Ishida K, Yamaguchi DT, Miller TA: Osteopontin is a negative regulator of proliferation and differentiation in MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblastic cells. Bone 2004;34:799-808 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.11.027
  26. Sato M, Yasui N, Nakase T, Kawahata H, Sugimoto M, Hirota S, Kitamura Y, Nomura S, Ochi T: Expression of bone matrix proteins mRNA during distraction osteogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 1998;13:1221-1231 https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.8.1221