Study on Effects of Media, EGF, ${\beta}-ME$ and Hormones on IVM of Porcine Oocytes

배양액 종류, EGF, ${\beta}-ME$ 및 호르몬이 돼지 난자의 체외 성숙율에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Jang, S.H. (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Rhee, M.H. (College of Veterinary Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, S.K. (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2006.09.30

Abstract

본 연구는 안정된 돼지 체외 성숙 난자를 얻을 목적으로 배양액의 종류 및 배양액에 EGF, ${\beta}-ME$, 호르몬 첨가가 돼지 난포란의 체외 성숙에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 난포란을 TCM-199, NCSU-23 및 PZM-3으로 48시간 배양했을 때 체외 성숙율은 각각 $22.1{\pm}0.70%,\;30.6{\pm}0.70%$$30.4{\pm}2.82%$였다. TCM-199로 48시간 배양했을 때 체외 성숙율은 NCSU-23 및 PZM-3 보다 약간 낮은 체외 발생율을 나타냈다. 난포란을 25 ng/ml의 EGF를 첨가한 TCM-199, NCSU-23 및 PZM-3로 48시간 배양했을 때 체외 성숙율은 각각 $46.3{\pm}2.8%,\;76.6{\pm}3.1%$$72.2{\pm}2.6%$로 나타났다. 난포란의 배양 시 배양액에 25 및 50 ng/ml의 EGF를 첨가 후 48시간 배양했을 때 첨가하지 않은 군에 비해 높은 체외 성숙율을 나타냈다(p<0.05). 난포란을 NCSU-23 및 PZM-3 배양액에 $25{\mu}M/ml$${\beta}-ME$를 첨가한 후 48시간 배양했을 때 체외성숙율은 각각 $43.9{\pm}1.41%,\;41.7{\pm}l.41%,\;44.4{\pm}0.70%,\;40.6{\pm}0.70%$로 나타났다. 난포란을 $25{\mu}M/ml$${\beta}-ME$를 첨가한 NCSU-23로 48시간 배양했을 때 첨가하지 않은 군에 비해 높은 체외 성숙율을 나타냈다(p<0.05). 난포란의 배양 시 NCSU-23에 PMSG, hCG, PMSG+hCG, hCG+${\beta}$-estradiol, PMSG+${\beta}$-estradiol을 첨가 후 배양하였을 때 체외 성숙율은 각각 75.6%, 77.8%, 80.0%, 86.4% 및 84.8%로서 무첨가 군(64.4%)에 비해 높게 나타났다(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Cantley TC, August R and Day BN. 1998. Coculture with follicular shell pieces can enhance the developmental competence of pig oocytes after in vitro fertilization: relevance to intracellualr glutathione. Biol. Reprod., 58:213-218 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod58.1.213
  2. Abeydeera LR, Wang WH, Cantley TC, Rieke A, Murphy CN, Prather RS and Day BN. 2000. Development and viability of pig oocytes matured in a protein-free medium containing epidermal growth factor. Theriogenology, 54:787-797 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00390-3
  3. Alberts D, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Watson DJ. 1994. Molecular Biology of the Cell (third ed.), Garland Publishing, New York
  4. Ball GD, Leibfried ML, Lenz RW, Ax RL, Bavister BD and First NL. 1983. Factors affecting successful in vitro fertilization of bovine follicular oocytes. Biol. Reprod., 28:717-725 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod28.3.717
  5. Chance B, Sies H and Boveris A. 1979. Hydroxyperoxide metabolism in mammalian organs. Physiol. Rev., 59:527-605 https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1979.59.3.527
  6. Ding J and Foxcroft GR. 1993. Conditioned media produced by follicular shells with different maturity affect oocyte maturation in the pig. Biol. Reprod., 50: 1377 - 1384
  7. Funahashi D. 2005. Effect of ${\beta}$-ME during in vitro fertilization procedures on sperm penetration into porcine oocytes and the early development in vitro. Reproduction, 130:889-898 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00702
  8. Hensleigh HC and Hunter AG. 1985. In vitro maturation of bovine cumulus enclosed primary oocytes and their subsequent in vitro fertilization and cleavage. J. Dairy Sci., 68:1456-1562 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)80983-8
  9. Lonergan P, Dinnyes A, Fair T, Yang X and Boland M. 2000. Bovine oocyte and embryo development following meiotic inhibition with butyrolactone. J. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 57:204 - 209 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200010)57:2<204::AID-MRD12>3.0.CO;2-N
  10. Okada K, Krylov V, Kren R and Fulka H Jr. 2006. Development of pig embryos after electro-activation and in vitro fertilization in PZM-3 or PZM supplemented with fetal bovine serum. J. Reprod. Dev., 52:91-8 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.17059
  11. Ootak K, Shigeta K and Muto N. 2004. Enhancement of developmental competence after in vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes by treatment with ascorbic acid 2-O-$\alpha$ -glucoside during in vitro maturation. Biol. Reprod., 65:1800-1806 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.6.1800
  12. Quan JH, Lee MH and Kim SK. 2004. Localization of angiotensin II in Koean bovine follicles and its effects on IVM/IVF of oocytes. Reprod. Dev. Bio., 28:59-63
  13. Quan, JH and Kim SK. 2005. Effect of EGF, ${\beta}$-ME, glucose on the in vitro maturation and development of porcine NT embryos. Korean J. Emb. Trans., 20:137-145
  14. Richard FJ and Sirard MA. 1996. Effects of follicular cells on oocyte maturation. Theca cell inhibition of bovine oocyte maturation in vitro. Biol. Reprod., 1 :22-28
  15. Shalgi R, Dekel N and Kraicer PF. 1979. The effects of LH on the fertilizability and subsequent development capacity of rat oocytes matured in vitro. J. Reprod. Fert., 55:429-435 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0550429
  16. Tatemoto H, Muto N, Sunagawa N, Shinjo A and Nakada A. 2001. Protection of porcine oocytes against cell damage caused by oxidative stress during in vitro maturation: role of superoxide dismutase activity in porcine follicular fluid. Biol. Reprod., 71:1150 -1157
  17. Whitaker BD and Knight JW. 2004. Exogenous gamma-glutamyl cycle compounds supplemented to in vitro maturation medium influence in vitro fertilization, culture, and viability parameters of porcine oocytes and embryos. Theriogenology, 62:311-322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.014
  18. Yeon SH, Son DS, Han MH, Wee, MS, Choi, SH and Lee, KS. 2004. Effects of some factors on invitro production of embryos from antral follicle-derived porcine oocytes. Korean J. Emb. Trans., 19:173-183
  19. Yoshiba M, Ishizaki Y, Kawagishi H and Kojima Y. 1992. Effects of pig fluid on maturation of pig oocytes in vitro and on their subsequent fertilizing and development capacity in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil., 95:172-177
  20. Yoshioka K, Suzuki C, Tanaka A, Anas IM and Iwamura S. 2002. Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod., 66:112-119 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.1.112