Service Quality Measurement of In-Flight Meal Service: A Comparison between Korean and Foreign-Based Airlines

  • Published : 2006.09.30

Abstract

The current exploratory study investigates and compares the perceptions of the service quality of in-flight meals through the evaluation of recent consumers (within 2 weeks) of services provided by Korean and foreign-based airlines. Twenty (20) items for measuring service quality were categorized into three factor dimensions of 'food quality', 'employee service', and 'professionalism'. Among these, 'employee service' was rated highest by Korean and foreign-based airlines. When items representing each service quality dimension were analyzed and compared, only the 'food quality' dimension of Korean-based airlines was perceived higher than that of other foreign-based airlines. Findings also revealed a spectrum with some items with higher or lower mean values within each service quality dimension. Results of this study can expectedly be used to benefit both from a theoretical and practical point of view by providing empirical data that measure the service quality of in-flight meal service.

Keywords

References

  1. Business Wire(1998): Frequent flyers reveal recipe for success when it comes to airline food
  2. Cardello AV, Bell R, Kramer FM(1996): Attitudes of consumers toward military and other institutional foods. Food Quality Preference 7(1): 7-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(95)00028-3
  3. Churchill GA, Surprenant C(1982): An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. J Marketing Res 19: 491-504 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151722
  4. Dorfman PW(1979): Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction: A case study in camping. Environment Behav 11(4): 483-510 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916579114004
  5. Getty JM, Thompson KN(1994): A procedure for scaling perceptions of lodging quality. Hospitality Res J 18(2): 75-96 https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809401800206
  6. Halstead D, Hartman D, Schmidt LS(1994): Multisource effects on the satisfaction formation process. J Acad Marketing Sci 22 (2): 114-129 https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222002
  7. King T(2001): Inflight catering. Tourism Hospitality Res 3(2): 181-184 https://doi.org/10.1177/146735840100300211
  8. Mazis MB, Ahtola OT, Klippel RE(1975): A comparison of four multi-attribute models in the prediction of consumer attitudes. J Consumer Res 2: 38-52 https://doi.org/10.1086/208614
  9. Mills J, Clay JM(2001): Consumer attitude toward adding quickservice foods to in-flight meals. J Res Foodservice Marketing 4(3): 99-112 https://doi.org/10.1300/J061v04n03_05
  10. Nomani A(1999): Carry-on food really taking off as airlines cut back. The Arizona Republic, D12
  11. arasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L(1988): SERVQUAL: A multiple- item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retailing 64: 12-40
  12. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L(1994): Reassessment of expectations as comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for further research. J Marketing 58: 111-124 https://doi.org/10.2307/1252255
  13. Pincus L(2001): Flight catering: A North American perspective. Tourism Hospitality Res 3(2): 174-176 https://doi.org/10.1177/146735840100300209
  14. Rudie MJ, Wansley HB(1985): Service marketing in a changing environment. Chicago: American Marketing Association
  15. Tu A(1997): Catering to passengers. Onboard Services 29(9): 14
  16. Weber K(1997): Assessment of tourist satisfaction using the expectancy disconfirmation theory. A study of German travel market in Australia. Pacific Tourism Rev 1: 35-45