Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Inoculants on the Quality of Round Baled Grass Silage

유산균제 첨가가 라운드베일 목초 사일리지의 품질에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2006.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of microbial inoculant on the quality of round baled grass silage at experimental field of Grassland and Forages Division, National Livestock Research Institute, RDA, Suwon from 1997 to 1998. The experiment was consist of randomized block design with three replications. The treatments were three different inoculant (control, inoculant A, B and C). The contents of ether extract(EE), crude protein(CP) and in vitro dry matter digestibility(IVDMD) in inoculant treatment plots were higher than those in control. Silages treated by Inoculant A, Band C had significantly lower acidity than that of control silage (p<0.05). Dry matter(DM) content of control silage was higher than those of inoculant treated silage. There were significant differences in organic acid contents among treatments(p<0.05). Lactic acid was increased with inoculant treatment, but, acetic and butyric acid was decreased. The DM loss of all silages were decreased with inoculant treatment and quality grade of inoculant treated silage was higher than that of control. Results of this study indicate that addition of microbial inoculant will improve the fermentation and quality of round baled grass silage.

본 시험은 젖산균 첨가제가 목초 라운드베일 랩핑 사일리지의 품질에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 2년간 수행되었다. 시험구 배치는 난괴법 3반복으로 무처리, 첨가제 A, B, C로 하여 총 4처리를 두었다. 조지방, 조단백질, in vitro 건물 소화율은 첨가제를 처리한 구에서 높게 나타났다. 또한 첨가제 처리는 사일리지의 pH를 유의적으로 낮추었다(p<0.05). 건물 함량은 첨가제 처리구가 높았으며 첨가제 처리로 유기산 함량은 유의적인 차이를 보여주었다(p<0.05). 젖산 함량은 첨가제 처리로 증가되었으나 초산과 낙산 함량은 감소되었다. 건물손실과 사일리지 품질은 젖산균 첨가제 처리로 개선되는 효과를 보여 주었다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 볼 때 사일리지 조제시 미생물 첨가제의 이용은 사일리지의 발효와 품질을 개선시켜주는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강우성, 김종근, 정의수, 김종덕, 김경남. 1999. 라운드 베일을 이용한 생볏짚 사일리지의 품질 향상에 관한 연구. 한초지. 19(1):41-48
  2. 김종근, 정의수, 서 성, 강우성, 함준상, 이성철. 2000a. 제조방법이 라운드베일 귀리사일리지의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지 20(3):185-192
  3. 김종근, 정의수, 강우성, 함준상, 김종덕, 서 성, 이종경. 1999. 첨가제 처리가 알팔파 사일리지의 품질에 미치는 영향. 한초지 19(2):115-120
  4. 김종근, 김동암, 정의수, 강우성, 함준상, 서 성. 1999. 수확시 숙기 및 젖산균 제제가 호밀 라운드베일 사일리지 품질에 미치는 영향. 한국초지학회지 19(4):347-354
  5. 大山喜信. 1976. 栽培植物 分析測定法. 作物分析委員會編. pp.335-339
  6. 이광녕, 김동암. 1997. 예건 및 첨가제가 호밀 사일리지의 발효특성과 사료가치 및 호기적 안정성에 미치는 영향. 한초지. 17(2):187-198
  7. A.O.A.C. 1991. Official method of analysis. Washington D. C
  8. Froetschel, M.A., L.O. Ely and H.E. Amos. 1991. Effects of additives and growth environment on preservation and digestibility of wheat silage fed to holstein heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 74:546-556 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78202-7
  9. Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D. C
  10. Gordon, F.J. 1989. An evaluation through lactating cattle of a bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. Grass Forage Sci. 44:169-179 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01924.x
  11. Keady, T.W.J. and J.J. Murphy. 1996. Effects of inoculant treatment on ryegrass silage fermentation, digestibility, rumen fermentation, intake and performance of lactating dairy cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 51:232-241 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1996.tb02058.x
  12. Keady, T.W.J. and R.W.J. Steen. 1994. Effects of treating low dry matter grass with a bacterial inoculant on the intake and performance of beef cattle and studies on its mode of action. Grass Forage Sci. 49:438-446 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb02021.x
  13. Kennedy, S.J. 1990. An evaluation of three bacterial inoculants and formic acid as additives for first harvest grass. Grass Forage Sci. 45:281-288 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1990.tb01951.x
  14. Lindgren, S., A. Bromander and K. Petterson. 1988. Evaluation of silage additives using scale model silos. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 18:41-49
  15. Mayne, C.S. 1990. An evaluation of an inoculant of Lactobacillus plantarum as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 51:1-13 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100005109
  16. McDonald, P., A.R. Henderson and S.J.E. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of silage. Marlow : Chalcombe Publ
  17. Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science
  18. Patterson, D.C., C.S. Mayne, F.J. Gordon and D. J. Kilpatrick. 1997. An evaluation of an inoculant/enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage for dairy cattle. Grass Forage Sci. 52:325-335 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1997.tb02363.x
  19. Rooke, J.A., F.M. Maya, J.A. Arnold and D.G. Armstrong. 1988. The chemical composition and nutritive value of grass silage prepared with no additive or with the application of additives containing either Lactobacillus plantarum or formic acid. Grass Forage Sci. 43:87-95 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1988.tb02144.x
  20. SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user's guide : Statistics. SAS Inst., Inc
  21. Sharp, R., P.G. Hooper and D.G. Armstrong. 1994. The digestion of grass silages reduced using inoculants of lactic acid bacteria. Grass Forage Sci. 49:42-53 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1994.tb01975.x
  22. Tilley, J.M.A. and R.A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Bri. Grassl. Soc. 18:104-111 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  23. Wilkinson, J.M. 1990. Silage UK(6th ed.). Chalcombe Publ., Church Lane. Kingston. Canterbury, Kent, UK

Cited by

  1. Effect of Harvest Stage of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) on the Quality of Round Baled SSH Silage vol.31, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.143
  2. Effects of Harvest Stages and Ensiling Method on Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid Silage vol.31, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.3.295
  3. Study on Manufacture of Corn Silage Using Gunny Bag vol.31, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.3.305
  4. Study on Quality of Corn AG-BAG Silage Manufactured with Corn Grown in Reclaimed Paddy Field vol.31, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.4.423
  5. Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum-Sorghum Hybrid Bale and Trench Silage According to Those Parts vol.32, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.3.221
  6. Effects of Ensiling Method on Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) Silage in Different Locations of SSH Silage vol.32, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2012.32.3.245
  7. Effect of Harvest Maturity, Wilting and Inoculant on the DM Losses and Morphological Changes of Round Baled Rye Silage vol.35, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.4.283