Estimation Economic Value of Multi-functionality and Preservation Program of Stone Fences in Jeju

제주 전통돌담의 가치평가 및 보전 방안

  • 이상영 (농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원 농촌자원개발연구소)
  • Published : 2006.06.25

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to estimate the economic value of Multi-functionality Roles including landscape and so on, which the stone fences in Jejudo possess, using Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Method(DC-CVM). The stone wall is life cultural heritance of Cheju islanders. It has functions like Development of Favorable Landscapes, Maintenance of Cultural Heritage, and Recreation/Relaxation. Expectation from Cheju visitors shows that the existence and inheritance value of the stone wall is higher then we expected. According to the research that we had done from the people that had agreed to contribute the stone wall, the result was that the public commercial value of Cheju tradition stone will increase every yew(2006: 367 billion won, 2011: 437.1 billion won). Therefore, preserving the stone wall that has Multi-functional Roles and values can lead to huge economic value in the future. But farmhouses in the stone wall conservation area are being supported 6 million won every year. This is only 10% of the income that farmhouse ems per year. Thus, stone wall preservation policy and plan that can raise green-tour commercial value of Cheju Island of long-term inside measurement will have to be propelled continuously.

Keywords

References

  1. 고광민, 2004, 제주도의 생산기술과 민속, 대원사
  2. 권오상, 이태호, 2001, 농업의 다원적 기능관련 실증 분석 방향제시 및 정책제안, 농촌진흥청 연구동향분석 보고서
  3. 김태균, 1998, 이선선택형 가상가치평가에서의 가설적 가치와 실제가치, 경제학연구 46(4) : 309-322
  4. 서동균, 2001, '농업의 다원적 기능 연구와 평가사례', 농업의 다원적 기능 평가방법, 농촌진흥청 농업경영자료 제63호
  5. 오세익, 김수석, 강창용, 2001, 농업의 다원적 기능의 가치평가 연구, 농림기술개발사업 연구보고서, 농촌경제연구원, 농림부
  6. 오세익, 김은순, 박현태, 1995, 쌀 농업의 환경보전 효과에 관한 연구, 한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
  7. 유진채, 공기서,2001, 'CVM에 의한 친환경농업의 비시장적 가치평가', 농업경영.정책연구 28(2) : 238-254
  8. 윤봉택, 1997, '제주돌이 깨어지는 소리', 서귀포 문화, 서귀포 문화원
  9. 이광석, 1996, '농촌방문의 경제적 편익', 농업경제 연구 37 : 147-159
  10. 이광석, 1997, '도시인의 휴가지 및 주거지로서의 농촌선택 성향분석', 농업경제연구 38(1) : 35-46
  11. 이상영, 長谷部正, 野村希晶, 木谷忍, 2002, '멀티미디어를 이용한 농촌경관평가의 한.일 비교', 농업경영.정책연구 29(4) : 639-658
  12. 이상영, 신용광, 김영, 2003, '농촌 공익기능의 보전 기금에 대한 지불의사분석', 농업경영.정책연구 30(3) : 524-535
  13. 이상영, 신용광, 2003, '주민참가에 의한 계단식 논의 다원적 기능개발', 농업경영.정책연구 30(4) : 688-700
  14. 이상영, 신용광, 김영, 2004, '환경자원의 가치평가', 농촌자원개발연구소
  15. 이상영, 신용광, 김영, 김은자, 2004, '관광농원의 보건휴양기능 가치평가', 농업경영.정책연구 31(2) : 329-345
  16. 최태길, 조재환, 김태균, 2000, '더블허들모형에 의한 품질인증 상추 수요분석', 농업경제연구 41(1) : 81-93
  17. Bishop, R. C. and T. A. Heberlein, 1979, 'Measuring Values of Extra Market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 : 926-930 https://doi.org/10.2307/3180348
  18. Cameron, T. A., 1988, 'A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Market Goods Using Referendum Data : Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 : 355-379 https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(88)90008-3
  19. Carson, R. T., 1985, Three Essays on Contingent Valuation, Ph. D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley
  20. Cragg, J., 1971, 'Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods', Econometrica 39 : 829-844 https://doi.org/10.2307/1909582
  21. Green, W. H., LIMDEP version 8.0 User's Manual, Econometric Software, INC
  22. Hanemann, W. M., 1984, 'Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses,' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 : 322-341
  23. Heckman, J. J., 1979, 'Sample selection bias as a specification error', Econometrica 47 : 153-161 https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
  24. Krinsky. I., and A.L. Robb, 1989, 'On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities', Review of Economics and Statistics 68 : 715-719 https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
  25. Nawata, K., 1992, 'トービット.モデルによる金融資産分析への應用について', フイナンシャル.レビュー, June-1992 : 29-47
  26. Tobin, James, 1958, 'Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods', Econometrica 26 : 24-36 https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382