Anti-adhesive Effect of Poloxamer/Alginate/CaCl2 Mixture in the Rat Model

백서 맹장/복벽 찰과상 모델에서 열감응성 유착방지제(Poloxamer/ Alginate/CaCl2 Mixture)의 효과

Gwon, Seong-Won;Im, Se-Hwan;Lee, Yeong-U;Lee, Yun-Gi;Chu, Bo-Yeong;Lee, Jin-Ho;Lee, Yeong-Mu
권성원;임세환;이영우;이윤기;추보영;이진호;이영무

  • Published : 20060000

Abstract

Purpose: The occurrence of post-surgical adhesion is still a major cause of postoperative morbidity due to the lack of satisfactory treatment or prophylaxis. Several adhesion barriers have been developed in the form of solutions or membrane in an attempt to solve these problems. However both types of tissue barriers have some limitations in their practical applications. In order to overcome these problems, a temperature-sensitive Poloxamer/Alginate/CaCl2 mixture was prepared as an adhesion barrier. With this material, toxicity, inflammation and the adhesion prevention effect was evaluated in an animal model. Methods: The sol-gel transition behavior was measured using a viscometer. An in vitro gel stability test and an in vivo degradation test was performed. The anti-adhesion effect was evaluated using a cecal-abdominal wall abrasion model. The denuded cecum was coated with Poloxamer/ Alginate/CaCl2 mixture, GUARDIX-SL (positive control group) or neither (negative control group) and apposed to the abdominal wall (each n=14). One week after surgery, the level of adhesion was graded from zero to three using a whole-number system. Results: The LCST of the poloxamer/sodium alginate mixture was 25oC. The gel stability of Poloxamer was improved by adding mild cross-linked sodium Alginate/CaCl2 mixture. The adhesion grade and area were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control. Conclusion: The anti-adhesive effect of the Poloxamer/ Alginate/CaCl2 mixture was comparable to the previously- developed solution type barrier and all the materials had degraded within 21 days. From these results, Poloxamer/ Alginate/CaCl2 mixture is a good candidate for use as a coatable or injectable tissue adhesion barrier. (J Korean Surg Soc 2006;71:280-287)

Keywords

References

  1. Yang HY, Suh KS, Youn YK, Kim SW, Kim SJ, Lee KU, et al. A clinical analysis of intestinal obstruction in the adult. J Korean Surg Soc 1997;52:335-42
  2. Lee WJ, Moon BI, Park JB, Kim 1M, You BO. The factors influencing the treatment for the mechanical intestinal obstruction due to adhesion. J Korean Surg Soc 1995;49:192-203
  3. Falk K, Bjorquist P, Stromqvist M, Holmdahl L. Reduction of experimental adhesion formation by inhibition of plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. Br J Surg 2001;88:286-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01647.x
  4. Shim HS, Lee YW, Lee YM, Oh YH, Kwon SW, Kim JR, et al. Evaluation of resorbable materials for preventing surgical adhesion on rat experiment. J Korean Sur Soc 2002;63:179-86
  5. Bums JW, Colt MJ, Burgees LS, Skinner KC. Preclinical evaluation of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:40-8
  6. Yaacobi Y, Israel AA, Goldberg EP. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by tissue precoating with polymer solutions. J Surg Res 1993;55:422-6 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.1993.1163
  7. Luciano AA, Hauser KS, Benda 1. Evaluation of commonly used adjuvants in the prevention of postoperative adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;146:88-92 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(83)90932-8
  8. Ghellai AM, Stucchi AF, Lynch DJ, Skinner KC, Colt MJ, Becker JM. Role of a hyaluronate-based membrane in the prevention of peritonitis-induced adhesions. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:310-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80081-5
  9. Greenawalt KE, Butler TJ, Rowe EA, Finneral AC, Garlick DS, Burns JW. Evaluation of sepramesh biosurgical composite in a rabbit hernia repair model. J Surg Res 2000;94:92-8 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.6020
  10. Polishuk WZ, Bercovici B. Intraperitoneal low molecular dextran in tubal surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971; 78:724-7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1971.tb01636.x
  11. Jansen RP. Failure of peritoneal irrigation with heparin during pelvic operations upon young women to reduce adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:154-60
  12. Moll HD, Wolfe DF, Schumacher J, Wright JC. Evaluation of sodium carboxymethylcellulose for prevention of adhesions after uterine trauma in ewes. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:1454-6
  13. Diamond MP, Wiseman DM, Linsky C. Interceed (TC7) absorbable adhesion barrier. Infert Reprod Med Clin North Am 1994;5:485-508
  14. Boyers SP. Gore-Tex surgical membrane. Infert Reprod Med Clin North Am 1994;5:509-28
  15. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coli Surg 1996;183:297-306
  16. Novikova LN, Novikov LN, Kellerth JO. Biopolymers and biodegradable smart implants for tissue regeneration after spinal cord injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:711-5 https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200312000-00011
  17. Lansdown AB, Payne MJ. An evaluation of the local reaction and biodegradation of calcium sodium alginate (Kaltostat) following subcutaneous implantation in the rat. J R Coli Surg Edinb 1994;39:284-8
  18. Orive G, Carcaboso AM, Hernandez RM, Gascon AR, Pedraz JL. Biocompatibility evaluation of different alginates and alginate-based microcapsules. Biomacromolecules 2005;6:927-31 https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049380x
  19. Marijnissen WJ, van Osch GJ, Aigner J, van der Veen SW, Hollander AP, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL, et al. Alginate as a chondrocyte-delivery substance in combination with a non-woven scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2002;23:1511-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00281-2