Field Study of Characteristics of Airborne Bacteria Distributed in the Regulated Public Facilities

규제대상 다중이용시설내 부유세균의 분포 특성에 관한 현장 조사

  • Kim, Ki Youn (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Gyu Yeob (Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Jae Beom (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chi-Nyon (Institute for Occupational Health, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Jong (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 김기연 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 장규엽 (아주대학교병원 산업의학과) ;
  • 박재범 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김치년 (연세대학교 의과대학 산업보건연구소) ;
  • 이경종 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Received : 2005.09.27
  • Accepted : 2005.12.31
  • Published : 2006.03.31

Abstract

Concentration and identification of airborne bacteria in the regulated public facilities were examined with the six-stage cascade impactor. Geometric mean total and respirable concentrations of airborne bacteria were $404cfu/m^3$ and $194cfu/m^3$ in hospital, $931cfu/m^3$ and $358cfu/m^3$ in kindergarten, $294cfu/m^3$ and $134cfu/m^3$ in day-care center, and $586cfu/m^3$ and $254cfu/m^3$ in postpartum nurse center, respectively. As a result, culturable total and respirable concentrations of airborne bacteria were significantly highest in kindergarten and lowest in day-care center (p<0.05). The ratio of respirable to total concentration of airborne bacteria in the investigated public facilities was ranged from 30% to 40% but there was no significant difference among them (p>0.05). The mean I/O ratio of culturable total and respirable concentrations were 0.58 and 0.66 in hospital, 0.71 and 0.83 in kindergarten, 0.28 and 0.41 in day-care center, and 0.63 and 0.78 in postpartum nurse center, respectively. Day-care center showed the lowest I/O ratio of culturable total and respirable concentration of airborne bacteria (p<0.05) but a significant difference was not found among other facilities. Indoor concentration of airborne bacteria did not correlated significantly with indoor temperature and relative humidity (p>0.05) but had a significant positive correlation with $CO_2$ and surrounding condition (p<0.05). Staphylococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., Corynebacterium spp., and Bacillus spp. were dominant genera and amounted to over 95% of total airborne bacteria identified in the investigated public facilities. Size distributions of four dominant genera did not observed inconsistently regardless of type of public facility.

Keywords

References

  1. 김기연, 고한종, 이경종. 임핀저 흡수액 조성에 따른 돈사 작업장내 바이오에어로졸 포집 효율 평가. 한국산업위생학회지 2004;14(3):283-289
  2. 김윤신, 이은규, 엽무종, 김기영. 다중이용시설에서의 실내 공기중 미생물 분포에 관한 연구. 한국환경위생학회지 2002;28(1):85-92
  3. 박동욱, 조경아, 윤충식, 한인영, 박두용. 유치원 교실에서 공기 중 박테리아와 곰팡이 발생에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국환경보건학회지 2004;30(5):440-448
  4. 손종렬, 이용식, 김종혁, 윤승욱, 김운수. 서울시 일부 다중이용시설 및 공동주택 실내공기질 실태조사. 한국실내환경학회 추계학술대회 논문집 2005, p.272-276
  5. 송재훈, 배직현. Air Sampler를 이용한 병원 내 공기중 미생물 오염도의 측정. 감염 1990;22:221-226
  6. 이창래, 김기연, 김치년, 박동욱, 노재훈. 종합병원내 부유 미생물 농도 및 환경 요인과의 상관성 조사. 한국산업위생학회지 2005;15(1):45-51
  7. 이철민, 김윤신, 이태형, 박원석, 홍승철. 다중이용시설내 공기중 바이오에어로졸 농도분포 특성에 관한 연구. 한국환경과학회지 2004;13(3):215-222
  8. 정낙은, 정세윤, 정용호, 김신규, 최태열, 김춘원, 김기홍. 공기오염측정기(RCS Air Sampler)를 이용한 병원내 공기오염도 측정에 관한 연구. 대한임상병리학회지 1986;6(1):117-123
  9. 정선희, 백남원. 일부 병원 실내에서의 공기중 미생물 오염에 관한 연구. 한국산업위생학회지 1998;8(2):231-241
  10. 조현종, 홍경심, 김지훈, 김현욱. 일부 종합병원 내 영역별 공기 중 미생물 평가. 한국산업위생학회지 2000;10(1):115-125
  11. 최종태, 김윤신. 병원내 공기중 미생물의 농도에 관한 조사연구. 한국환경위생학회지 1993;19(1):30-36
  12. 하권철, 백남원. 미생물을 이용한 일부 병원, 가정 및 일반 대기질의 평가. 한국산업위생학회지 1991;1(1):73-81
  13. 환경부. 2004. 다중이용시설등의 실내공기질관리법률
  14. 환경부. 실내공간 실내공기오염 특성 및 관리방법 연구. 2002
  15. Andersen AA. New sampler for collection, sizing and enumeration of viable airborne parhcles. J Bacterial 1958;76:47 1-484 https://doi.org/10.1002/path.1700760102
  16. Arturo B, Gwen W, Alan MD, Catherine LG, Cristina LH. Schoolbased identification of asthma in a low-income population. Pediatric Pulmon 2000;30(4):297-301 https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0496(200007)30:1<1::AID-PPUL1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  17. Aylor DE, Paw CKT. The role of electrostatics in spore liberation by Drechslem turcica Mycologia 1980;72: 12 13- 12 19 https://doi.org/10.2307/3759577
  18. Bovallius A, Bucht B, Roffey G, Anas F? Three-year investigation of the natural airborne bacterial llora at four localities in Sweden. Appl Environ Mimbiol 1978;5:847-852
  19. Burge H. Bioaerosols: prevalence and health effects in the indoor environment. J Allergy Clin Immunol1990;86:687-701 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(05)80115-0
  20. CoxCS, Wathes CM (Eds). Bioaerosols Handbook. Lewis PublishedCRC Press, hlc., Boca Raton, Florida 1995
  21. Cox CS. The aerosol survival of Escherichia coli B in nitrogen, argon and helium atmospheres and the influence of relative humidity. J Genet lhhcrobiol 1968;50( 1 ): 139- 147
  22. DeKoster JA, Thorne PS. Bioaerosol concentrations in noncomplaint, complaint and intervention homes in the Midwest. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1995;56:576-580
  23. Di Giorgio C, Krempff A, Guirdud H, Binder P, T i t C, Dumenil G. Atmospheric pollution by airborne microorganisms in the city of Marseilles. Atmos Environ 1996;30: 155- 160 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00143-M
  24. Ellis JJ. The effect of medium, temperature and age on Rhizopus delemar sporangiospore size. Mycologia 1981 ;73:362-368 https://doi.org/10.2307/3759621
  25. Gallup J, Kozak P, Cummins L, Gilman S. Indoors mold spore exposure: characteristics of 127 homes in Southem California with endogenous mold problems. Adv Aerobiol 1987;51:139- 147
  26. Gorny RL, Dutkiewicz J, Krysinska-Traczyk E. Size distribution of bacterial and fungal bioaerosols in indoor air. Ann Agric Environ Med 1999;6: 105-113
  27. Gorny RL, Dutkiewicz J. Bacterial and fungal aerosols in indoor environment in central and eastern European countries. Ann Agric Environ Med 2002;9: 17-23
  28. Harding H. Effect of pH and sucrose concentration on conidium size and septation in four Bipolaris species. Canadian J Botany 1975;53: 1457-1464 https://doi.org/10.1139/b75-178
  29. Holt GL. Seasonal indoorloutdoor fungi ratios and bacteria levels in noncomplaint ofice buildings. In: Pm. 5th Int. Conf. Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Vol. 2,33-38. Canada Mortgage and Housing Copration, Ottawa 1990
  30. Hyvarinen A , Vahteristo M, Meklin T, Jantunen M, Nevalainen A, Moschandreas, D. Temporal and spatial variation of fungal cocnentrations in indoor air. Aerosol Sci Technol 2001 ;35:688-695 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820117763
  31. Jdal AA, Nsanze H, Ameen AS, Banat IM, Mogheth AA. Hospital airborne microbial pollution in a desert country. Environ Int 1997;23(2): 167- 172 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00003-2
  32. Lacey J, Dutkiewicz J. Bioaerosols and occupational lung disease. J Aerosol Sci 1994;25(8): 1371- 1404 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(94)90215-1
  33. LarsenFO, Meyer HW, Ebbehoy N, Gyntelberg F, Sherson, Netterstrom B, Gravesen S, Nom S. Are fungi-specific IgE found in stuff suffering from nonallergic sick building syndrome- Inflamm Res 1997;46(Suppl. 1):79-80
  34. Law AKY, Chau CK, Chan GYS. Characteristics in bioaerosol office in office buildings in Hong Kong. Building Environ 2001;36:527-541 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(99)00056-6
  35. Lehtonen M, Reponen T, Nevalainen A. Everyday activities and variation of fungal spore concentrations in indoor air. Int Biodeter Biodegr 1993;31 :25-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/0964-8305(93)90010-Y
  36. Li CS, Hou PA. Bioaerosol chmteristics in hospital clean rooms. Sci Total Envriron 2003;305:169-176 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00500-4
  37. Li CS, Hsu LY Home dampness and childhood respiratory symptoms in a subtropical climate. Arch Environ Health 1996;51 :424
  38. Lighthart B, Shaffer BT. Airborne bacteria in the atmospheric surface layer: temporal distribution above a grass seed field. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995;61:1492-1496
  39. LundholmIM. Comparison of methods for quantitative determinations of airborne bacteria and evaluation of total viable counts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982;44: 179- 183
  40. MacherJM, Huang FY, Flores M. A two-year study of microbiological indoor air quality in a new apartment. Arch Environ Health 1991;46:25-29 https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1991.9937425
  41. MancinelliR. Shulls WA. Airborne bacteria in an urban environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 1978;35: 1095-1101
  42. Manuel ES, Edwin KS, Lars AH, Scott TW, Juan CC. Material history, sensitization to allergens, and current wheezing, rhinitis, and eczema among children in Costa Rica Pediatric Pulmon 2002;33(4):237-243 https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.10070
  43. Marh B, Lighthart B. Effects of betaine on the enumeration of airborne bacteria Appl Environ Microbiol 1990;56:1286-1289
  44. Einarsson R, Dreborg S. Allergen avoidance in a daycare center. Allergy 1995;51:36-41
  45. Munir AK, Hyvarinen A, Pasanen A, Reponen T. Fungi and bacteria in normal and mouldy dwellings. In: Samson, R.A., Nevalainen A, Flannigan, B., Flannigan, M.E., Verhoeff, A.P., Adan, O.C.G., Hoekstra, E.S. (Eds.), Health Implications of Fungi in Indoor Environments. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 155- 162,1994
  46. Nevalainen A, Willeke K, Liebhaber F, Pastuszka J, Burge H, Henningson E. Bioaerosol sampling. In: Willeke, K., Baron, PA. (Eds.), Aerosol Measurement. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 47 1492,1993
  47. Nevalainen A. Bacterial Aerosols in Indoor Air. National Public Health Institute, Helsinki 1989
  48. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA Technical manual, section III: Chapter 2, Indoor air quality, Available from URL:http://www.osha-slc.gov/dtd2o0t0m
  49. Otten JA, Burge HA. Bacteria. In: Macher, J. (Ed.), Bioaerosols, Assessment and control. ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH, pp. 200-214. 1999
  50. Owen MK, Ensor DS, Sparks LE. Airborne particle sizes and sources found in indoor air. Atmos Environ 1992;26A:2149-2162
  51. Pasanen AL, Pasanen P, Jantunen MJ, Kalliokoski P Significance of air humidity and air velocity for spore release into the air. Atmos Environ 1991;25A:459-462
  52. Pastuszka JS, Paw UKT, Lis DO, Wlazlo A, Ultig K. Bacterial and fungal aerosol in indoor environment in Upper Silesia, Poland. Atmos Environ 2000;34:3833-3842 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00527-0
  53. Rahkonen P, Ettala M, Laukkanen M, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Airborne microbes and endotoxins in the work environment of two sanitary landfills in Finland. Aerosol Sci Technol 1990;13:505-513 https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829008959465
  54. Rahkonen P Airborne contaminants at waste treatment plants. Waste Management & Research 1992;10:411-421 https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X9201000504
  55. Reponen T, Gazenko SV, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K, Cole EC. Characterisitics of airborne actinomycete spores. Appl Environ Microbiol 1998;64(10):3807-3812
  56. ReponenT, Willeke K, Ulevicius V, Reponen A, Grinshpun SA. Effect of relative humidity on the aerodynamic diameter and repiratory deposition of fungal spores. Atmos Environ 1996;30(23):3967-3974 https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00128-8
  57. Reponen T. Bioaerosol and particle mass levels and ventilation in Finish homes. Environ Int 1989; 15:203-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(89)90028-7
  58. Robinson J, Nelson WC. National Human Activity Pattern Survey Data Base. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. 1995
  59. Seinfeld JH. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution. Wiley, New York, p. 738. 1986
  60. Thome PS, Niekhaefer MS, Whitten P, Donharn KT. Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine. Appl Environ Microbiol 1992;58:2543-2551
  61. Venkataraman C, Kao AS. Comparison of m c l e lung doses from the fine and coarse fractions of urban PM-10 aerosols. Inhalation Toxicol 1999;11:151-169 https://doi.org/10.1080/089583799197230
  62. WalterMV, Marthi B, Fieland VP, Ganio LM. Effect of aerosolization on subsequent bacterial survival. Appl Environ Microbiol 1990;56:3468-3472
  63. WLPLC , Su HJ, Lin CY Characteristics of indoor and outdoor airborne fungi at suburban and urban homes in two seasons. Sci Total Environ 2000;253:111-118 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00460-X