Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (신경정신의학)

Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (대한신경정신의학회)
권호 표지

Development and Validation of a Modified form of the Stress Response Inventory for Workers

스트레스 반응 척도의 수정판 개발 및 타당화 연구 : 근로자 대상

Choi, Seung-Mi;Kang, Tae-Yeong;Woo, Jong-Min
최승미;강태영;우종민

  • Published : 20060000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives：The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a modified form of the Stress Response Inventory (SRI-MF) for workers. Methods：In study I, the Stress Response Inventory was conducted in 3,420 person, who worked for public institutions and large corporations. They were selected from 10 areas throughout the country. After we performed experimental factor analysis in order to select the items by internal consistency and factor loadings, we developed the short form of SRI (SRI-MF). In Study II, SRI-MF was validated by showing convergent/divergent validity with other stress-measuring instruments in another samples. Results：In study I, factor analysis yielded 5 factors, and two of them were excluded because of their low internal consistency. Consequently, total 22 items in the remaining 3 factors (somatization, depression, anger) were selected for the SRI-MF. Test-retest reliability of the SRI-MF was significantly high, ranging between .67-.71. Cronbach’s α was also high. In study II, convergent validity was computed by correlating scores of other scales (GARS, SCL-90-R, PSQ) score. The correlations were all at significant levels. Discriminant validity was computed by comparing the total score and scores of 3 subscales in the patient and normal group. There were significant differences in the total and scores of 3 subscales between the two groups. Conclusion：The results of identifying factor structure in the SRI indicated 5 signifcant factors. Among them, 3 factors can be employed for the modified form of SRI with a high internal consistency. Thus, we suggest that the SRI-MF should be a effective and valid scale to evaluate stress response in work places. (J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2006;45(6):541-553)

건강과 삶의 질에 대한 꾸준한 관심의 증가는 이제 단순히 오래 사는 삶이 아니라, 행복하게 잘 사는 삶이 목표가 되는 새로운 가치 기준을 제시하고 있다. 어떻게 하면 잘살 수 있는가에 있어 주요 관심은 육신의 건강 뿐 아니라, 정신적인 건강으로까지 그 영역을 넓혀 왔으며, 정신 건강을 위협하는 스트레스를 평가, 관리하는 데 전문가 및 일반인들의 관심이 모아지고 있다. 특히 하루의 대부분을 보내게 되는 직장, 직무 관련 스트레스에 관심이 모아지면서 이를 연구하고 그와 관련된 정신 건강 문제 및 위험 상황을 사전에 선별, 삶의 질을 개선할 뿐 아니라, 기업과 조직의 생산성을 높이는 데 주력하고 있다. 이를 위해 스트레스 및 그와 관련 정신적 증상들에 대한 정확한 평가가 요구되고 있으며, 유용하고 간결한 척도를 구성하는 것이 시급하다. 이런 면에서 볼 때, SRI는 비교적 쉬운 문항들로 구성된 스트레스 측정 척도로서 기존에 있던 외국 척도들의 번안이 아닌, 우리나라 사람들의 언어와 심리적 특징을 고려, 자체 개발된 검사라는 데 의의가 있다 할 것이다. 또한 스트레스에 대한 주요 반응을 인지, 정서, 행동, 신체적 반응이라는 주요 틀에서 문항을 구성, 다각도로 이를 측정할 수 있었다는 장점이 있다. 본 연구에서 개발된 수정판 SRI는 기존 SRI full version의 이러한 장점은 유지한 채 임상장면에서의 활용도를 높일 수 있도록 문항수를 축소했으며, 동시에 적절한 신뢰도와 타당도를 유지했다는 면에서 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Koh KB, Park JK, Kim CH. Development of the stress response inventory. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2000;39:707-719
  2. Koh KB. Stress & psychosomatic medicine. Seoul: Ilchokak;2002
  3. Cox T, Mackay CJ. A psychological model of occupational stress. Paper presented to the medical Research Council meeting on mental health in industry, London;1976
  4. Lazarns RS. Patterns of adjustment. New York: McGraw-Hill:1976
  5. Lazarus RS. The stress and coping paradigm In: Models for clinical psychopathology. Bd by Edisdorfer C. Cohen D, Kleinman A, Maxim P. New York: Spectrum;1981
  6. Rechlin T. The significance of heart rate analysis in psychiatric questions. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1981;63:106-120 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-996609
  7. Belkic K. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring: stress-mediated clinically relevant endpoints. Occupational Medicine State of the Art Reviews 2000;15: 196-203
  8. Bassett JR, Marshall PM, Spillane R. Physiological measurement of acute stress in bank employees. Int J Psychophysiology 1987;5:265 https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(87)90058-4
  9. Hwang IS. (A) Study on Factors Affecting Stress level of Mid-life men. Dept. of Social Welfare Graduate School of Administry Department Yonsei Univ:1998
  10. Lee MJ. Job Stress of Middle-aged Man and its Coping & Satisfaction with Life According to the Social Support. Dept. of Social Welfare Dongduk Women's Univ;2002
  11. Lee YS, Cho JY. A Standardization Study of the Korean Version of the Adolescent's State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1999;38:794-804
  12. Spielberger CD. State-trait anger expression inventory-professional manual. Odessa. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources:1996
  13. Kim KI, Won HT, Lee JH, Kim KY. Standardization study of Symptom check list-90 in Korea I J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1978; 7:449-458
  14. Linn MW. A global assessment of recent stress (GARS) scale. Int J Psychiatry Med 1985;15: 47-59 https://doi.org/10.2190/XP8N-RP1W-YE2B-9Q7V
  15. Koh KB. Stress Perception of Patients with Psychosomatic Disorders. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1988;27:514-522
  16. Park JS, Kim JH.직무 스트레스 평가 방법, Seoul: Korea Medical Book;2004
  17. Robert MA, Hirschfeld MD. The Comorbidity of Majer Depression and Anxiety Disorders: Recognition and Management in Primary Care. J Abnorm Psychol 2001;3:244-254
  18. Min SK. A Study of the Concept of Hwabyung. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoction 1989;28:604-616
  19. Park JH, Min SK, Lee MH. A Study on the Diagnosis of Hwabyung. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoction 1997;36:496-502
  20. 2006 Economically active population survey Korea National Statistical Office 2006. 5. http://kosis.nso.go.kr:7001/ups/chapterRetrieve. jsp? pubcode=MA&seq=98&pub=3
  21. 2006 통계로 보는 여성의 삶. Korea National Statistical Office 2006.7
  22. Yang BH. 다변량 자료 분석의 이해와 활용. Seoul: Hakjisa;2002
  23. Cliff N. Analyzing multivariate data. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Javanovich; 1997