Computation and Assessment of Delivery Pollutant Loads for the Streams in the Nakdong River Basin

낙동강 소수계별 유달부하량 산정 및 평가

  • Yoon, Young-Sam (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Yu, Jae-Jeong (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Moon-Su (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Hae-Jin (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 윤영삼 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 유재정 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 김문수 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 이혜진 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소)
  • Received : 2005.10.17
  • Accepted : 2006.01.09
  • Published : 2006.03.30

Abstract

Production loads of the contaminants near the Nakdong-river are, BOD : $1,006ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, TN : $117ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, and TP : $21ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$. Among the sources of contamination, the biggest contribution to the production load was shared by the human population, which maintains 40.7% of BOD, 44.2% of TN, and 52.5% of TP production. Similarly, among the sources of discharge load, the human population contributed 45.0% of BOD, 34.5% of TN, and 45.8% of TP. Results of flow investigation in 2001 and 2002 indicate that among the side streams, Nam-river showed the greatest average flow. In case of main stream flow, it was increased in the downstream due to the increase of the influents from the side streams. In case of BOD, COD, TOC and SS, high values were detected at Keumho-river where industrial wastewater was discharged as high level concentration. In case of the main stream, Koryoung point where direct influence of Keumho-river and Seongseo industrial complex is evident showed high BOD, COD and TOC. Oxidized nitrogen compounds and total nitrogen showed similar patterns of BOD, COD, and TOC. Especially, nitrate nitrogen was relatively high at all points. However, in case of Chlorophyll-a, relatively high values were observed at mid- and downstream areas such as Koryoung, Namjee, Soosan, Moolkeum and Hakooeun. This could be caused by the slow flow rate and the abundant nutrient salts attributed by the side streams. Relatively better water quality was observed in 2002 when the flow was relatively abundant than that in 2001. Results of investigation during 2001-2002 showed that delivery load increased as the flow reaches downstream. In 2001, delivery loads at the downstream Soosan-bridge were BOD $22,152ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, COD $45,467ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, TN $22,062ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, TP $926ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$. Delivery loads in 2002 were increased due to the increase of the rainfall. They are BOD $25,876ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, COD $64,200ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, TN $41,101ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$, and TP $1,362ton{\cdot}day^{-1}$.

Keywords

References

  1. 과학기술처, 수질향상을 위한 수자원 종합 관리 운영 시스템개발, p. 182 (1992)
  2. 김승우, 박석순, 김회성, 특정수계 권역의 수질총량규제 방안연구, 한국환경정책평가 연구원, p. 2 (1997)
  3. 김태윤, 낙동강의 부영양화 제어를 위한 수질관리 모델링, 부경대학교 박사학위 논문, p. 3 (1999)
  4. 낙동강물이용조사단, 낙동강물이용조사단보고서, 환경부, p. 529 (2001)
  5. 양상용 등, 낙동강 수계별 오염부하량 조사연구(II), 국립환경 연구원, p. 67 (2002)
  6. 정부합동, 낙동강수계 물관리종합대책, p. 115 (1999)
  7. 정성웅 등, 환경정보시스템과 연계한 금강수계 수질관리기법 개발, 금강수질검사소, p. 7 (2000)
  8. 조태웅 등, 낙동강 수계별 오염부하량 조사연구(I), 국립환경 연구원, p. 49 (2001)
  9. 포항산업과학연구원, 낙동강 오염실태 조사 및 장단기개발 계획 수립, p. 7 (1999)
  10. 한국환경정책평가원, 낙동강 수계에서의 총량 규제 방안에 관한연구, p. 15 (1994)
  11. 환경부, 사육두수별 가축별 배출 원단위, 환경부고시 제91 - 49호 (1991)
  12. 환경부, 수환경정책자료집 (1994)
  13. 환경부, 낙동강수계 대권역 수질보전계획 (1992-1996)