Horticultural Science & Technology (원예과학기술지)

Korean Society of Horticultural Science (한국원예학회)
권호 표지

Analysis of Therapeutic Programs according to Participants in Paper Published on Horticultural Therapy in Korea

국내 논문에 있어 원예치료 대상자별 프로그램 분석연구

Oh, Dae-Min;So, In-Seop;Lee, Young-Hyun;Heo, Mu-Ryong;Jang, Yu-Jin;Choe, Yeong-Hae;Heo, Buk-Gu
오대민;소인섭;이영현;허무룡;장유진;최영해;허북구

  • Published : 20060000
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine the research outcomes of horticultural therapy through the papers published of academic journals in horticulture for 6 years in Korea and demonstrate its multilateral effects. The most frequent forms of horticultural activity were in most cases art and craft (type III) and outdoor plant growing (type II); the number of times horticultural activities were done ranged from 11 to 15 (37.7%), the frequency was once a week (81%), the number of participants was less than ten (47.8%), and the most frequent form of horticultural therapy was transplanting (72 times). Therefore, the kind of horticultural activity, the number of times and frequency of them and the number of participants tend to be similar regardless of the characteristics of participants. These findings suggest that more individualized and diversified programs of horticultural activity need to be designed and implemented.

국내에서 진행되는 원예치료의 치료 성과 연구를 보다 심화·발전시키며 다각적인 효과성 입증을 위한 새로운 방향을 제시하고자, 1998년부터 2003년까지 6년간 원예 관련 학회지 발표 논문을 중심으로 분석한 결과 가장 많이 사용된 원예활동은 대부분의 대상자별 프로그램에서 아트와 크래프트, 실외에서 식물 가꾸기로 나타났으며 프로그램 진행 횟수는 11～15회, 진행 간격은 주 1회, 대상인원은 10명 미만, 원예치료 프로그램은 식물 옮겨심기의 빈도가 가장 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 원예치료가 수행된 대상자별 원예활동의 범주 및 프로그램 진행 횟수와 간격, 참여 인원, 상위 빈도로 사용된 활동의 형태의 경향이 비슷하게 나타났음을 알 수 있다. 이것은 대상자별 특성을 고려한 차별적인 치료프로그램의 개발 및 적용의 여부를 검증해야 할 필요성을 보여주는 결과로 여겨진다.

Keywords

References

  1. American Horticultural Therapy Association (AHTA). 1991. Horticultural therapy. http://www.ahta.org
  2. Choi, Y.A. and K.C. Son. 1999. Various horticultural therapy program applying children. 2th Symposium of Kor. Hort. Therapy Research Society. p. 79-99
  3. Choi, Y.A. 2003. Horticultural therapy. Hakjisa Press, Seoul
  4. Do, K.M., A.K. Lee, and J.G. Suh. 1999. A survey in status of practicing amenity horticulture. J. Kor. Soc. Plants, People, and Environ. 2(3):39-50
  5. Heo, B.G, J.K. Suh, C.E. Song, K.S. Bae, H.J. Kim, and Y.J. Park. 2004. University students have the image and curiosity associated with horticultural therapy. J. Kor. Soc. Plants, People, and Environ. 7(2):52-61
  6. Kim, J.H., D.S. On, O.S. Kim, and S.J. Jeong. 2003. Development of horticultural therapy programs for teenagers. J. Kor. Soc. Plants, People, and Environ. 6(3):57-70
  7. Kim, H.S., E.H. Lee, and H.R. Kwack. 2001. A case study on evaluation of horticultural therapy for middle school students. J. Kor. Soc. Plants, People, and Environ. 4(4): 27-32
  8. Lee, Y.H., and M.L. Ro. 2002. A study on the effects of practice programs for horticultural therapy. J. Kor. Soc. Plants, People, and Environ. 5(3):43-48
  9. Matsuo, E. 2004. What is horticultural well being in relation to horticultural therapy. International People-Plant Symposium in Sydney. (Abstr.)
  10. Oh, D.M. 2004. A study on the application of horticultural therapy to social welfare policy. PhD. Diss. Cheju Natl. Univ., Jeju, Korea
  11. Relf, P.D. 1992. The role of horticulture in human well-being and social development. Timber Press, Portland
  12. Son, J.R. 2000. Modern psychology. Sigmaplus, Seoul
  13. Son, K.C, H.J. Jeong, and J.E. Song. 2004. Comparison of the effectiveness of different horticultural therapy programs for individuals with chronic schizophrenia. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 22:135-142