Development of Self Administered Questionnaire and Validity Evaluation for American National Standards Z-365 Checklist

미국표준연구원 체크리스트 Z-365의 자가보고형 설문개발 및 타당도 평가

  • Park, Kyung Sik (Kosin University Medical School Department of Preventive Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Dongmug (Pusan University Medical School Department of Preventive and Occupational Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yong Hwan (Kosin University Medical School Department of Preventive Medicine) ;
  • Woo, Ji Hoon (Pusan University Medical School Department of Preventive and Occupational Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Yong Chul (Department of Health and Safety Engineering, Inje University)
  • 박경식 (고신의대 에방의학교실) ;
  • 강동묵 (부산의대 에방의학 및 산업의학교실) ;
  • 이용환 (고신의대 에방의학교실) ;
  • 우지훈 (부산의대 에방의학 및 산업의학교실) ;
  • 신용철 (인제대학교 보건안전공학과)
  • Received : 2006.04.06
  • Accepted : 2006.05.25
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

Self administered checklist is needed to be developed to evaluate ergonomic risk factors. This study was conducted to develop self administered form of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z-365 checklist which represents comprehensive ergonomic risk factors, and to evaluate validity of this checklist. This study had been conducted from May 2004 to July 2005, of which subjects were 147 workers from 4 workplaces. Response rates for every items of self administered form of ANSI Z-365 were evaluated. To estimate the validity of checklist, relationship between the checklist grade that ANSI recommended and work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) symptom were calculated with and without adjustment of related variables. To evaluate the utility of checklist, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated. Because response rates of almost items were over 90 %, item development was successful. Because the checklist was related with WMSDs symptom after adjusting related variables, the checklist might represents ergonomic risk well. Because of low sensitivity and NPV, high specificity and PPV, the checklist is not suitable for screening tool. The checklist has better relationship with more severe symptom. Because of high specificity of the checklist, using it with high sensitive tool would enhance it's utility. Further study to develop high sensitive and comprehensive self administered ergonomic checklist is needed.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽현석, 백남원. 자동차 조립라인에서의 인간공학적 위험요인 평가에 관한 연구. 국민보건연구소 연구논집. 1998;8(2):25-36
  2. 노동부. 2004년도 산업재해 현황. 노동부, 2005
  3. 노동부, 단순반복작업 근로자 작업관리지침. 노동부고시 제 2000-72호, 노동부, 2001
  4. 안연순, 최용휴, 강성규, 정호근. 작업관련성 근골격계질환으로 요양승인된 사례 분석. 대한산업의학회지 2002;14(2):154-168
  5. 이동준, 강동묵, 고상백, 손미아, 장준호, 조병만, 이수일. 육체적 작업강도 평가 설문지의 신뢰도와 타당도. 대한산업의학회지;2003;15(4):388-400
  6. 이윤근, 김현욱, 임상혁, 박희석. 누적외상성질환 위험요인의 정량적 평가 및 관리를 위한 점검표 개발 -자동차 조립 작업을 중심으로- 한국산업위생학회지 2001;11(1):56-69
  7. American National Standards Institute(ANSI). Control of Work related Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Part 1, Upper Extremities (working draft). ANSIN-365, ANSI; 1996
  8. Armstrong T, Fine LJ, Goldestein SA. Ergonomics consideration in hand and wrist tendonitis. Hand Surg 1987;12:830-837 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(87)80244-7
  9. Cannon LJ, Bernacki EJ, Walter SP. Personnel and Occupational factors associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Occup Med 1981;23:255-258
  10. De Krom MCT, Knipschild PG, Kester ADM, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F. Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:373-374 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90038-O
  11. Hignett S., McAtamney L. Rapid Entire Body Assessment(REBA). Applied Ergonomics 2000;31(2):201-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
  12. Jacobs D, Anisworth B, Hartman T, Leon A. A simultaneous evaluation of ten commonly used physical activity questionnaire. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1993;25:81-91 https://doi.org/10.1249/00005768-199301000-00012
  13. Karhu O, Kansi P, and Kuorinka I. Correcting working postures in industry - A practical method for analysis. Applied Ergonomics 1977;8:199-201 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
  14. Knava BG, Wibom RL, Voss M, Hedstrom LD, Berqvist UO. Work with video display terminals among office employee: I. subjective symptoms and discomfort. Scand J Work Environ Health 1985;11(6):457-466 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2200
  15. LaPorte R, Cauley J, Kinsey C, Corbett W, Robertson R, Black- Sandler R. The epidemiology of physical activity in children, college students, middle-aged men, menopausal females and monkeys. J Chr Disea. 1982;35:787-795 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(82)90090-X
  16. Leon A, Jacobs D, DeBacker G, Taylor H. Relationship of physical characteristics and life habits to treadmill exercise capacity. Amer J Epidemio. 1981;113:653-660 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113144
  17. LiG, Buckle P. A practical method for the assessment of workrelated musculoskeletal risks - quick exposure check(QEC), Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting, 1998;2:1351-1355
  18. Li G, Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics 1999;42(5):674-695 https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399185388
  19. McAtamney L, Corlett E. RULA : a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics 1993;24(2):91-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
  20. Nordstrom DL, Vierkant RA, DeStefano F, Layde PM. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:734-740 https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.10.734
  21. Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA). Ergonomic Program; Final Rule. 29 CFR Part 1910, Fedral Register Vol. 65, No. 220, OSHA; 2000
  22. Ola L, Christina W, Annika H. Validity of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing physical work loads in a general population. J Occup Environ Med. 2002; 44: 724-735 https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200208000-00007
  23. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Carpal tunnel syndrome: Causes and a preventive strategy. Semin Occup Med 1986a;1:213-221
  24. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Hand and wrist cumulative trauma disorders in industry. Br J Ind Med 1986b;43:779-844
  25. Rempel DM, Harrison RJ, Barnhart S. Work related cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremity. JAMA 1992;267(6):838-842 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.6.838
  26. Winkel J. Mathiassen SE. Assessment of physical load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues, and operational considerations, Ergonomics 1994;37:979-88 https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963711