Effect of Vocal Hygiene Education in the Patients with Vocal Polyp

성대 폴립 환자에서 음성위생교육의 효과

Yun, Yeong-Seon;Kim, Sang-Woo;Baek, Jeong-Hwan;Jeong, Ha-Sin;Son, Yeong-Ik
윤영선;김상우;백정환;정하신;손영익

  • Published : 20060000

Abstract

Surgical removal is generally known as the gold standard treatment of vocal polyp. However, the authors have not infrequently observed marked reduction or complete disappearance of the vocal polyps when vocal hygiene education was provided as a part of preoperative routine preparation. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of vocal hygiene education and to define the factors that can predict which patients with vocal polyp will get benefits from it. Subjects and Method:We reviewed the medical records of 190 patients with vocal polyp, and selected 88 patients who had received vocal hygiene education and completed a series of follow-up evaluation at 3 months later. According to the change of polyp size, patients were grouped into two:improvement and no improvement group. Eight factors (age, gender, duration of hoarseness, initial polyp size, hemorrhagic change of vocal polyp, degree of occupational voice abuse, smoking, and presence of reflux symptoms) were compared between the two groups. Results:When given the vocal hygiene education, 19% of overall 190 patients and 41% of 88 patients who were followed up belonged to the improvement group. Univariate analyses showed that female patients, shorter duration of hoarseness, smaller polyp size, less occupational voice abuse, and no smoking are the meaningful favorable predictive factors. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that female patients with a small polyp and no symptoms of reflux have the largest possibility of getting improved. Conclusion:Vocal hygiene education should be providedas a first line of treatment for patients with vocal polyp, especially when a female patient without reflux symptom has a small polyp.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi SS, Zalzal GH. Voice Disorders. In: Cummings CW, Flint PW, Harker LA, Haughey BH, Richardson MA, Robbins KT, editors. Cummings Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby;2005. p.4296-307
  2. Stringer SP, Schacfer SD. Disorders of Laryngeal Function. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, Gluckman JL, Meyerhoff WL, editors. Otolaryngology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;1991. p.2257-72
  3. Srirompotong S, Saeseow P, Vatanasapt P. Small vocal cord polyps: Completely resolved with conservative treatment. Southest Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2004;35:169-71
  4. Johns MM. Update on the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of vocal fold nodules, polyps, and cysts. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:456-61 https://doi.org/10.1097/00020840-200312000-00009
  5. Andrade DF, Heuer R, Hockstein NE, Castro E, Spiegel JR, Sataloff RT. The frequency of hard glottal attacts in patients with muscle tension dysphonia, unilateral benign masses and bilateral benign masses. J Voice 1999;14:240-6
  6. Verdolini-Marston K, Sandage M, Titze IR. Effect of hydration treatments on laryngeal nodules and polyps and related voice measures. J Voice 1994;8:30-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80317-0
  7. Verdolini K. National center for voice and speech's guide to vocology. Lowa City IA: National Center for Voice and Speech: 1998. p.27-32