Influence of 1-Methylcyclopropene Vacuum Infiltration on Respiration and Ethylene Production in Tomato Fruits

토마토 과실의 호흡 및 에틸렌 생성에 대한 1-Methylcyclopropene의 진공 침투 처리 효과

Heo, Jeong-Eun;Choi, Seong-Jin
허정은;최성진

  • Published : 20060000

Abstract

A standard method to treat fruits with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is to close the fruits for a relatively long time with the 1-MCP gas at the atmospheric pressure so that the gas diffuses into the fruits. In this study, 1-MCP gas was vacuum-infiltrated into the tomato fruits within a short time and the treatment efficiency was evaluated by measuring the changes of respiration and ethylene production rates. By the forced infiltration of 1-MCP, respiration rate was reduced proportional to the treated 1-MCP concentrations and inversely proportional to the applied vacuum pressures. But the 1-MCP treatment increased ethylene production, especially under the vacuum pressure of 60 mbar. At 120 mbar vacuum pressure the 1-MCP was efficiently infiltrated into the fruits. However an increase in concentration of 1-MCP was required to acquire the same level of effect as standard treatment method, presumably because of the increased ethylene production.

과실에 1-MCP를 처리하는 관행적인 방법은 대기압의 밀폐 조건에서 확산에 의해 과실 내부로 1-MCP를 침투시키는 방법이다. 본 연구에서는 1-MCP를 과실 내부 조직에 수분 이내에 강제 침투시키는 진공 침투 방법을 이용하여 토마토 과실에 1-MCP를 단시간 동안 처리한 후 에틸렌 생성과 호흡량의 변화를 분석하였다. 1-MCP의 강제 침투 처리에 의해 저장 초기 과실의 호흡이 억제되어 120mbar 내외의 진공압을 이용하면 1-MCP를 조직 내에 효율적으로 침투시킬 수 있을 것으로 판단되며 그 이하의 진공압 조건에서는 에틸렌의 생성이 증가하는 경향을 보였다. 그러나 1-MCP의 강제 침투 처리에 의해 에틸렌 생성량은 증가하였으며 관행적인 밀폐 처리와 동일한 수준의 처리 효과를 얻기 위해서는 보다 높은 농도의 1-MCP가 요구되는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blankenship, S.M. and J.M. Dole. 2002. 1-Methylcyclopropene: A review. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00246-6
  2. Clara, P., E.V. de B. Vilas-Boas, M. Benichou, and A.A. Kader. 2003. Variability in responses of partially ripe bananas to 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28:75-85 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00124-2
  3. DeEll, J.R., D.P. Murr, M.D. Porteous, and H.P.V. Rupasinghe. 2002. Influence of temperature and duration of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment on apple quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 24:349-353 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00136-3
  4. Jiang, Y., D.C. Joyce, and A.J. Macnish. 1999. Responses of banana fruit to treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene. Plant Growth Regul. 28:77-82 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006222631666
  5. Lizada, C.C. and S.F. Yang. 1979. A simple and sensitive assay for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Anal. Biochem. 100:140-145 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(79)90123-4
  6. Mathooko, F.M., Y. Tsunashima, W.Z.O. Owino, Y. Kubo, and A. Inaba. 2001. Regulation of genes encoding ethylene biosynthetic enzymes in peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit by carbon dioxide and 1-methylpropene. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 21:265-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00158-7
  7. Mir, N.A., E. Curell, N. Khan, M. Whitaker, and R.M. Beaudry. 2001. Harvest maturity, storage temperature, and 1-MCP application frequency alter firmness retention and chlorophyll fluorescence of 'Redchief Delicious' apples. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:618-624
  8. Sisler, E.C., M. Serek, and E. Dupille. 1996. Comparison of cyclopropene, 1-methylcyclopropene, and 3, 3-dimethylcyclopropene as ethylene antagonists in plants. Plant Growth Regul. 18:164-167
  9. Sisler, E.C. and M. Serek. 1997. Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor levels: Recent developments. Physiol. Plant. 100:577-582 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03063.x
  10. Sisler, E.C. and S.F. Yang. 1984. Anti-ethylene effects of cis-2-butene and cyclic olefins. Phytochem. 23:2765-2768 https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9422(84)83011-3
  11. Wills, R.B.H. and V.V.V. Ku. 2002. Use of 1-MCP to extend the time to ripen of green tomatoes and postharvest life of ripe tomatoes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 26:85-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00201-0
  12. Yang, S.F. and N.E. Hoffman. 1984. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35:155-189 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103