Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on User-Generated Metadata

이용자 생성 메타데이터에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Jae-Yun (Department of Library and Information Science, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Hwang, Hye-Kyong (Knowledge Asset Team, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
  • 이재윤 (경기대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 황혜경 (한국과학기술정보연구원 지식기반팀)
  • Published : 2006.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the amount of information through growing Internet has dramatically increased recently, information professions generated metadata has been reached the limits of their role. Based on the value of information depends on the user, user generated metadata is a growing paradigm in the field of information organization today. This paper firstly introduces the concepts of user-generted metadata, and then examines the cases of user annotation and user tagging. Finally we discuss the effects and implications of user-generated metadata on the development of digital libraries.

전통적으로 정보전문가의 역할이었던 메타데이터 생성은 인터넷이 대중화되고 인터넷상의 정보가 폭증하면서 그 한계에 부딪치게 되었다. 이에 오늘날 정보자료의 가치는 그것을 사용하는 이용자에 달려있다는 인식하에 정보이용자가 메타데이터를 만드는 새로운 정보조직 패러다임이 부상하게 되었다. 본고에서는 이용자 생성 메타데이터에 해당하는 이용자 주석과 이용자 태깅의 개념과 구현사례를 살펴보았다. 그리고 이용자 생성 메타데이터가 디지털도서관 발전에 미치는 영향과 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 문헌정보처리연구회. 1998. 메타데이터의 형식과 구조. 서울: 문헌정보처리연구회.
  2. 최희윤. 2003. 확장된 디지털도서관의 지식펌프형 지식관리에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.
  3. 황혜경, 이재윤. 2006. 이용자의 참여, 협력, 공유를 근간으로 하는 학술정보 포털서비 스: Connotea와 CiteULike를 중심으로, 제 13회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회, 2006년 8월 17일. [서울: 연세대학교].
  4. Agosti, M., N. Ferro, I. Frommholz, E. Panizzi, W. Putz, and U. Thiel. 2006. Integration of the DiLAS annotation service into digital library infrastructures. Proceedings of the Workshop on Digital Libraries in the Context of Users (DL-CUBA 2006), 1-4.
  5. Annotea Project Homepage. 2006. [cited 2006. 08.01]. .
  6. Arko, R. A., K. M. Ginger, K. A. Kastens, and J. Weatherley. 2006. Using annotations to add value to a digital library for education. D-Lib Magazine, 12(5). [cited 2006.08.02]. .
  7. Blandford, Ann, and Jeremy Gow. 2006. Digital libraries in the context of users' broader activities: JCDL 2006 workshop report. D-Lib Magazine, 12(7/8). [cited 2006.07.29]. .
  8. CiteULike Homepage. 2006. [cited 2006.07.28]. .
  9. CiteULike. 2006. All about CiteULike: Frequently Asked Questions. [cited 2006.7.20]. .
  10. Cochrane, P. A. 1983. Guest editorial: a paradigm shift in library science. Information Technology & Libraries, 2(1): 3-4.
  11. Connotea Homepage. [cited 2006.07.28]. .
  12. Cooksey, E. B. 2005. Too important to be left to change: serendipity and the igital library. Science and Technology Libraries, 25(1/2): 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v25n01_03
  13. Crawford, Walt. 2006. Library 2.0 and “Library 2.0”. Cites & Insights, 6(2). [cited 2006.07.15]. .
  14. Fitcher, Darlene. 2006. Intranet applications for tagging and folksonomies. Online, 30(3): 43-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610650291
  15. Fox, G. 2006. Some Comments on CiteULike and related Tools. [cited 2006. 7. 20]. .
  16. Hildreth, C. R. 1985. Online Public Access Catalogs. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 20: 233-285.
  17. Kastens, Kim. 2005. The DLESE Community Review System: Gathering, aggregating, and disseminating user feedback about the effectiveness of Web-based educational resources. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1): 37-43. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.37
  18. Kunze, J. A. 1996. Guide to Creating Core Descriptive Metadata. Draft 3. 18 September. [cited 2006.08.01]. .
  19. Lagoze, C., D. B. Krafft, S. Payette and S. Jesuroga. 2005. What is a digital library anymore, anyway?: beyond search and access in the NSDL. D-Lib Magazine, 11(11). [cited 2006. 7. 21]. .
  20. Lund, B., J. Scott, T. Hammond and T. Hannay. Connotea: A Free Online Reference Management Service for Scientists. D-Lib Magazine, 11(3). [cited 2006. 7. 20]. .
  21. Mathes, Adam. 2004. Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. [cited 2006.07.25]. .
  22. Thomas, Charles F., and Linda S. Griffin. 1998. Who will create the metadata for the Internet?. First Monday, 3(12). [cited 2006.07.15]. .
  23. Tran, J. 2006. Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: proof of concept. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 12(1): 83-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614560600802940
  24. University of Pennsylvania. 2005. PennTags Homepage. [cited 2006.07.28]. .