Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Suitability Analysis of Numerical Models Related to Seepage through a Levee

제방 침투 수치해석 모형의 적합성 분석

  • Im, Dong-Kyun (Water Resources Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Yeo, Hong-Koo (Water Resources Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Kim, Kyu-Ho (Water Resources Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology) ;
  • Kang, Jun-Gu (Water Resources Research Dept., Korea Institute of Construction Technology)
  • Published : 2006.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Numerical models for seepage analysis are useful tools to analyze problems and design protection techniques that are related to seepage through a levee. Though every model may have its own limitations and shortcomings, there were no generalized verifications or calibrations for the commercial models. It means that users can run the model and get the result without understanding nor taking any enough training. This paper Investigates applicability and suitability of some seepage numerical models by comparing analytical solutions with experiments in the user's viewpoint. The results showed that it is more desirable to use analyses with unsaturated-unsteady condition rather than those with saturated-steady conditions, since seepage phenomenon of real levees are changed according to water level and soil property. This study also compared the calculated unsteady solutions with the calculated steady solutions for the levee at Koa of the Nakdong River The comparison revealed that as the result, the safety factor of $2.0{\sim}3.5$ has the same effects for seepage protection techniques when they are designed on the basis of steady-state analysis.

침투 해석 수치모형은 제방 침투와 관련된 문제 해석과 방지기법 설계에 있어 매우 유용한 방법이나, 각각의 수치 모형은 적용상 한계와 문제점을 내포하고 있다. 일반적으로 사용되고 있는 상용 프로그램은 적용하는 다양한 문제에 대해서 검증이나 보정이 이루어지지 않을 뿐 아니라, 사용자가 침투현상에 대한 정확한 지식이나 교육 없이도 결과를 도출할 수 있게 되어 있다. 본 연구에서는 해석해와 실험을 통해 침투 수치모형의 적합성과 적용 시 고려사항을 사용자적 입장에서 검토하였다. 실제 제방의 경우 수위와 토질조건 등에 따라 침투현상이 변화하기 때문에 정상 침투해석이 아닌 비포화 비정상 침투해석을 시행하는 것이 바람직한 것으로 나타났다. 또한 낙동강 고아지구 제방에 대해 정상 및 비정상 침투해석 결과를 비교하였다. 검토 결과 정상 침투해석 결과를 토대로 침투보강공법을 설계할 경우 안전계수를 $2.0{\sim}3.5$ 정도 적용한 것과 동일한 효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상규, 김영묵 (1991). '강우로 인한 사면 불안정' , 대한토질공학회 논문집, 대한토질공학회, Vol 7 (1),pp. 53-64
  2. 신방웅,강종범 (1999). '모형실험에 의한 토공구조물의 침투거동 특성', 한국산업안전학회지 논문집,한국산업안전학회, Vol 14(4), pp. 158-167
  3. 신방웅, 이봉직 (1993). '수평흐름에 의한 토제체의 비정상침투에 관한 실험적 연구', 대한토목학회학술발표회 논문집(I), 대한토목학회, pp. 397-400
  4. 윤광석, 여규동 (2004). '하천제방 침투해석을 위한 한강 수계 설계홍수파형 결정', 대한토목학회 학술발표회 논문집, 대한토목학회
  5. 한국수자원학회 (2005). 하천설계기준.해설
  6. 中島秀雄 (2003). 圖說 河川堤防, 技報堂
  7. Bardet, J. P. and Tobita, T. (2002). 'A practical method for solving free surface seepage problems', Computers and Geotechnics, 29(6), pp. 451 - 475 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(02)00003-4
  8. Billstein, M., Svensson, U., and Johansson, N. (1999). 'Application and validation of a numerical model of flow through embankment dams with fractures: Comparison with experimental data', Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol 36, pp. 651 - 659 https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-36-4-651
  9. Bowles, J.E. (1984) Physical and geotechnical properties of soils, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York
  10. Buckingham, E. (1907). Studies on the movement of soil moisture, Bull. 38, United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Soils, Washington D.C., 61
  11. Casagrande, A. (1937). 'Seepage through dams', Journal of the New England Water Works Association, Vol 51, pp.131 - 172
  12. Chapuis, R.P. (1990). 'Sand-bentonite liners: field control methods', Canadian Geotechnical , Vol 27, pp. 216-223 https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-025
  13. Chapuis, R.P., Chenaf, D. Bussiere, B. Aubertin, M., and Crespo, R (2001). 'A user's approach to assess numerical codes for saturated and unsaturated seepage conditions', Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol 38, pp. 1113 -1126 https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-38-5-1113
  14. Cividini, A. and Gioda, G. (1990). 'On the variable mesh finite element analysis of unconfined seepage problems', Geotechnique, Vol 40(3), pp. 523-526 https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.523
  15. Crespo, R. (1993). Modelisation par elements finis des ecoulements a travers les ouvrages de retenue et de confinement des residus miniers. M.Sc.A. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal
  16. Darcy, H. (1856). Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon; V. Dalmont, Paris
  17. Desai, C.S. (1973). 'Approximate solution for unconfined seepage', Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, Vol 99, pp. 71-87
  18. Dupuit, J. (1863). Etudes theoriques et pratiques sur le mouvement des eaux dans les canaux decouoerts et a travers les terrains permeables, Dunod, Paris
  19. Forchheimer, Ph. (1886). 'Uber die ergebigkeit von brunnen anlagen und sickerschlitzen', Zeitschrift des Architekten-und Ingenieur Vereins zu Hannover, Vol 32, pp. 539-564
  20. Kozeny, J. (1927). 'Ueber kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden', Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Vol 136(2a), pp. 271-306
  21. Neuman, S.P. and Witherspoon, P.A. (1970). 'Finite element method of analyzing steady seepage with a free surface', Water Resources Research, Vol 6(3), pp. 889-897 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR006i003p00889
  22. Schaffemak, F. (1917). Uber die Standsicherheit durchlasessiger gesdtuetteter damme, Allgem, Bauzeitung
  23. Shaw, F.S. and Southwell, R.V. (1941). 'Relaxation methods applied to engineering problems;Vll, Problems relating to the percolation of fluids through porous materials', Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Vol 178, pp. 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1941.0038
  24. Taylor, R.L. and Brown, C.B. (1967). 'Darcy flow with a free surface', Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, pp. 25-33
  25. Terzaghi, K. (1925). Erdbaumedunik, Franz Deuticke, Vienna
  26. US Army Corps of Engineers (1986). Seepage analysis and control for dams, EM 1110-2-1901
  27. van Genuchten, M. Th. (1980). 'A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils', Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol 44, pp. 892-898 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x

Cited by

  1. Estimation of Design Flood-Hydrograph for Unsteady Seepage Analysis Through River Levees vol.12, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.6.275
  2. The Estimation of the Uplift Pressure and Seepage Discharge under Gravity Dam: Development of a 3-D FDM Model in Heterogeneous Media vol.46, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.12.1221
  3. Levee Stability Assessment Depending on Levee Shape and Flood Wave vol.47, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.4.307
  4. Prediction of Return Periods of Sewer Flooding Due to Climate Change in Major Cities vol.30, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2016.30.1.041