DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Education for Information Literacy

정보활용능력 교육의 효용성에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Published : 2006.03.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of education for information literacy by measuring information literacy of selected experimental group and controlled group from university students. Information literacy of each group was measured through structured questionnaires before and after taking the instruction course. The result showed there was a significant difference between two groups after the instruction. and the effectiveness of information literacy showed especially high in the area of information ethics and information analysis. It was also revealed that the education for information literacy is not affected by basic environmental factors at all. Also. students taken the course showed strong self-confidence and positive recognition in information literacy and library use, thus proved that education of information literacy is highly effective both in cognitive and attitudinal side for university students as a liberal arts course.

본 연구는 정보활용능력 교육의 효용성을 알아보고자 선정된 실험집단과 통제집단을 통하여 각 집단의 수업전후의 정보활용능력을 측정하였다. 교육 후에 실험집단과 통제집단의 정보활용능력의 차이는 유의한 것으로 나타났다. 정보활용능력 교육의 효과는 각 영역에서 높은 것으로 나타났는데 특히 정보윤리 영역과 정보분석 영역에서 그 효과가 높음을 보였다. 그러나 정보활용능력 교육은 기초환경요인에 영향을 받지 않는 것으로 밝혀졌다. 또한 교육을 수강한 학생들은 정보활용능력에 대한 자신감과 도서관에 대한 인식도가 변화되었다. 이로서 정보활용능력의 교육은 인지적, 태도적 측면 모두 대학생들에게 교양과목으로서 효용성이 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강미혜. 1989. 대학도서관 오리엔테이션 프로그램의 교육적 효율성 비교에 관한 실험연구. '圖書館學', 17: 85-103
  2. 오의경, 장혜란. 2005. 대학생의 정보리터러시에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. '한국문헌정보학회지', 39(4): 207-231
  3. 이정연. 2005. 대학생의 정보활용능력 평가모형 개발에 관한 연구. '정보관리학회지', 22(4): 39-59
  4. 장혜란. 1989. 도서관 이용교육 효과의 집단별 차이에 관한 연구. '圖書館學', 17: 261- 273
  5. 최은주, 박남진. 2005. 대학생의 정보활용능력에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구. '정보관리학회지', 22(4): 153-172
  6. 日本圖書館協會 圖書館利用敎育委員. 2001. '圖書館利用敎育ガイドライン合冊版: 圖書館における情報リテラシ;支援サビスのために'. 東京: 日本書館協會.
  7. American Library Association. 1989. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy. Final Report. Chicago: ALA
  8. Association of College and Research Libraries. 2003. Assessing Student Learning Out comes for Information Literacy Instruction in Academic Institutions. Avery, E. F. ed. IL: American Library Association
  9. 2000. Information Literacy Compe- tency Standards for Higher Education. [cited 2004. 8].
  10. Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. 2004. Australian and New Zealand Information Literacy Framework: Principles, Standards and Practice. 2nd ed. Alan Bundy ed. Adelaide: Austrian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy
  11. Bruce, C. 1997. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib
  12. California State University. 2000. CSU Information Competence Survey Report. California State University Chancellor's Office and the CSU Information Competence Assessment Task Force
  13. Council of Australian University Librarians. 2001. Information literacy standards. first edition. Canberra: Council of Australian University Librarians. [cited 2006. 3. 2].
  14. Conference of Rectors and Principals of Quebec Universities. 2003. Information Literacy : Study of Incoming First-year Undergraduates in Quebec. Quebec: Bibliotheque nationale de Quebec
  15. Doyle, C. S. 1992. 'Outcome measures for information literacy within the national education goals of 1990.' Final Report to National forum on Information literacy. ED351033
  16. Dunn, K. 2002. 'Assessing Information Literacy Skills in the California State University: A Progress Report.' The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 28(1): 26-35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00281-6
  17. Kent State University. 2005. Project SAILS. [cited 2006. 2.1]
  18. Maughan, P. D. 2001. 'Assessing Information Literacy among Undergraduates: a Discussion of the Literature and the University of California-Berkeley Assessment Experience.' College and Research Libraries, 62(1): 71-85 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.1.71
  19. O'Connor, L. G & C. J. Radcliff & J. A. Gedeon. 2002. 'Applying Systems Design and Item Response Theory to the Problem of Measuring Information Literacy skills.' College and Research L: braries. November: 528-543
  20. 2001. Assessing Information Literacy Skills: Developing a Standardized Instrument for Institutional and Longitudinal Measurement. ACRL TechNational Conference. Denver: Colorado
  21. Orme, W.A. 2004. 'A Study of the Residual Impact of the Texas Information Literacy Tutorial on the Information Seeking Ability of First Year College Students.' College & Research Libraries. 65(3): 205-215
  22. Portmann, C.A. and Roush, A. J. 2004. 'Assessing the Effects of Library Instruction', The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 30(6): 461-465 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2004.07.004
  23. Roldan, M and Wu, Y.D. 2004. 'Building Context-Based Library Instruction.' Journal of Education for Business. 79(6): 323-327 https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.79.6.323-327
  24. Samson, S and Granath, K. 2004. 'Reading, Writing and Research: Added Value to University First-year Experience Programs.' Reference Services Review. 32(2): 149-156 https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410537667
  25. Society of College and National & University Libraries. 1999. Information skills in higher education: a SCONUL position paper. [cited 2005. 12.20]
  26. Smally, T. N. 2003. The Bay Area Community College Information Competency Assessment Project. [cited 2005. 12. 30].
  27. UCLA Library Instructional Services Advisory Committee. 2001. UCLA Library Information Competence at UCLA: Report of a Survey Project
  28. Zurkowski, P. 1974. The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Washington, D.C. : National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. ED 100391

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Evaluation of Information Literacy Program and the Development Ofits Design Principle vol.41, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2010.41.4.023