The Pattern of Clothing Export in Leading Countries

세계 주요 의류수출국의 의류수출 패턴

  • 지혜경 (한성대학교 패션디자인) ;
  • 이은영 (서울대학교 생활과학대학 의류학과)
  • Published : 2006.03.01

Abstract

The objective of the study is to review trends of clothing export in important countries of the world and thus to know the present stage of clothing export in Korea. For the purpose, changes of export amount, competitiveness and product life cycle were analysed in the countries from the 1960's to the 1990's. The results are as following: First, on the aspect of export amount, industrialized countries lost the lead to newly industrializing countries from the 1960's. Developing countries, as China, win the lead. Second, on the competitiveness aspect, industrialized countries lost competitiveness to newly industrializing countries before the 1960's. And newly industrializing countries were outpaced by China in the export competitiveness from the early 1990's. Third, on the aspect of product life cycle, industrialized countries go first through each period of product life cycle, introduction, growth, maturity and decline, and they all, excluding Japan, sustained period of Maturity for a long time. newly industrializing countries and developing countries go orderly through each period of product life cycle after industrialized countries. As to Korea, duration of each period was short. Specially characteristics of decline period appeared partly in the early 1990's. From the results, the theory of product life cycle, helping to explain changes in production and trade in new product lines, estimated to applicable to clothing export. The phenomena, Italy, Hong Kong and America sustain high competitiveness in the world clothing market for a long time, is needed to be studied carefully. The study about strong points in their clothing industries and competitiveness drive program be to influence Korean export policy in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product life cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp, 190-207
  2. 섬유산업연합회, 자료검색일 2005. 10. 10. 자료출처 httpp://www.kofoti.or.kr
  3. 산업연구원 (2003). 차세대 성장동력 발전전략. P. 86
  4. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product life cycle, pp. 190-207
  5. Wells, L.T. (1972), The product life cycle and international trade. Boston: Havard University Press. pp, 3-33
  6. UN, International Trade Statistics Yearbook. 1956-1998
  7. UN. Commodity Trade Statistics. 1990-1194
  8. UN. Statistics Division의 Commodity Trade Statistics Data Extract Service
  9. OECD, Foreign Trade by Commodities. 2000
  10. OECD. International Trade by Commodities Statistics CD-ROM
  11. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and 'Revealed' Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School. 33. May. pp. 99-123 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
  12. 이영선 (1980). 우리나라 수출상품의 비교우위분석과 전망. 국제경제연구원. PP. 27-49
  13. 김연학 (1986). 제품주기이환에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. pp. 50-69
  14. 김연학 (1986). 제품주기이환에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. pp 60-69
  15. 서성한 (1980). 한국 무역의 product life cycle모델 선정에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. pp 40-55
  16. 백방선 (1982) 제품수명주기에 관한 제품 포트폴리오의 관련 모형 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문,pp 105-115
  17. 한희영 (1982). 마아케팅관리론. 다산출판사. PP. 340-345
  18. Dickerson, K.G. (1991). Textiles and apparel in the international economy. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. pp,103-131
  19. 김수근 (1992). 경제성장이야기. 한국경제신문사, pp. 115-119
  20. Dickerson, K.G. (1991). Textiles and apparel in the international economy. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. pp. 132-161
  21. Textile Intelligence Limited (2001). Textile outlook international. January. p. 105
  22. 이은주, 권경란 (2001). 한국 의류 및 섬유산업의 경쟁우위 향상에 관한 제언. 한국의류학회지, 25(2), pp 458-469