DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal Design of Linear Viscous Damping System for Vibration Control of Adjacent Building Structures

인접구조물의 진동제어를 위한 선형감쇠시스템의 최적설계

  • 박관순 (동국대학교 건축공학부) ;
  • 옥승용 (서울대학교 교량설계핵심기술연구단) ;
  • 고현무 (서울대학교 지구환경시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

This paper proposes an optimal design method of linear viscous dampers for the seismic performance of two adjacent structures with different heights. Accordingly, connection method using diagonal bracing between two floors and connection method between two structures are considered, and the effectiveness of the latter method is confirmed through the comparison of the frequency response functions with respect to damping capacity. Moreover, optimal damping to minimize the response of the adjacent structures in the frequency domain is found. The sensitivity of natural frequency and modal damping according to the damper capacity at each floor is obtained for the optimally designed system. From the sensitivity analysis, the modal damping is evaluated to be very sensitive to the damper installed at higher floor. Therefore, sensitivity-based damping distribution method is proposed. Diagonal bracing connection method, uniform distribution method and sensitivity-based distribution method are compared to each other in terms of seismic performance. The comparative results demonstrate that the proposed method is an effective seismic design method for the adjacent structures.

이 논문에서는 서로 다른층 높이를 갖는 인접한 두 빌딩의 내진성능을 효율적으로 향상시킬 수 있는 선형 점성 감쇠기의 최적 설계방법을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 층간 대각 브레이싱 형태의 에너지 소산장치 연결방법과 인접 구조물간 에너지 소산장치 연결방법을 고려하였으며, 두 가지 연결방법을 적용한 시스템에 대한 감쇠용량별 주파수응답함수 비교를 통하여 구조물간 연결방법의 효율성을 확인하였다. 아울러 구조물간 연결방법에서 주파수응답함수를 최소화하는 최적 감쇠용량이 존재하는 것을 보이고, 최적 설계된 시스템에 대하여 감쇠용량별 구조물의 고유주파수 및 등가감쇠비의 민감도를 분석하였다. 민감도 분석 결과로부터 고층부에 설치되는 에너지 소산장치가 구조물의 등가 감쇠비를 효율적으로 증가시키는 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 민감도에 비례하는 새로운 감쇠기 설계방법을 제시하고, 대각 브레이싱 연결방법과 구조물간 연결로서 균등분포 및 제시하는 민감도 기반 분포에 따른 연결방법을 적용한 시스템들의 내진성능을 비교 분석하였다. 지진응답의 비교결과, 제시하는 방법이 인접 구조물의 효과적인 내진설계방법이 될 수 있음을 입증하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. National Academy of Sciences, The Great Alaska Earthquake of 1964, Engineering NAS Publication 1606, Washington, D.C., 1964
  2. Mahin, S. A., Bertero, V. V., Chopra, A. K. and Collins, R. G., Response of the Olive View Hospital Main Building during the San Fernando earthquake, Report No. EERC 76-22, University of California, Berkeley, 1976
  3. Bertero, V. V., 'Observations on Structural Pounding,' International Proceedings of the International Conference on the Mexico Earthquake, ASCE, 1987. pp. 264-278
  4. Benuska, L., (eds.), Loma Prieta Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, Report No. 90-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA., 1990
  5. Youd, T. L., Bardet, J-P. and Bray, J. D., (eds.), Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake of August 17, 1999 Reconnaissance Report, Publ. No. 00-03, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA., 2000
  6. Jennings, P. C., Engineering Features of the San Fernando Earthquake of February 9, 1971, Report No. EERL-71-02, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 1971
  7. Priestly, M. J. N., Seible, F. and Calvi, G. M., Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York, 1996
  8. Hall J. F., (eds.), Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994 - Reconnaissance Report, Vol. 1, Report No. 95-03, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, 1995
  9. Comartin C. D., Greene M. and Tubbesing S. K., (eds.), The Hyogo-Ken Nanbu Earthquake Reconnaissance Report, Report No. 95-04, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, 1995
  10. Uzarski, J. and Arnold, C., (eds.), Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake of September 21, 1999 - Reconnaissance Report, Publ. No. 01-02, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, 2001
  11. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, The Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake of February 28, 2001- Preliminary Reconnaissance Report, EERI, Oakland, CA, 200l
  12. Jain, S. K., Lettis, W. R., Murty, C. V. R. and Bardet, J.P. (eds), Bhuj, India Earthquake of January 26, 2001 Reconnaissance Report, Publ. No 02-01, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI), Oakland, CA, 2002
  13. Leibovich, A. E., Rutenberg, A. and Yankelevsky, D. Z., 'On eccentric seismic pounding of symmetric buildings,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 25, 1996, pp. 219-233 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199603)25:3<219::AID-EQE537>3.0.CO;2-H
  14. Klein, R. E., Cusano C. and Stukel, J., 'Investigation of a method to stabilize wind induced oscillations in large structures,' Paper No. 72-WA/AUT-H Presented at 1972 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New York, November, 1972
  15. Kobori, T., Yamada, T., Takenaka, Y., Maeda, Y. and Nishimura, I., 'Effect of dynamic tuned connector on reduction of seismic response: application to adjacent office buildings,' In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conrerence on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. V, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988, pp. 773-778
  16. Westermo, B., 'The dynamics of interstructural connections to prevent pounding,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 18, 1989, pp. 687-699 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290180508
  17. Gurley, K., Kareem, A., Bergman, L. A., Johnson, E. A. and Klein, R. E., 'Coupling tall buildings for control of response to wind,' Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability, Schueller, Shinozuko & Yao, (eds.), Balkema Publishers: Rotherdam, Netherlands, 1994, pp. 1553-1560
  18. Kamagata, K., Miyajima, K. and Seto, K., 'Optimal design of damping devices for vibration control of parallel structures,' Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Chiba, Vol. 2, 1996, pp. 334-339
  19. Fukuda, Y., Matsumoto, Y. and Seto, K., 'Bending and torsional vibration control of Mexible structures arranged in parallel,' Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Chiba, Vol. 3, 1996; 12-17
  20. Zhang, W. S. and Xu, Y. L., 'Dynamic characteristics and seismic response of adjacent buildings linked by discrete dampers,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 10, 1999, pp. 1163-1185 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199910)28:10<1163::AID-EQE860>3.0.CO;2-0
  21. Xu, Y. L., He, Q. and Ko, J. M., 'Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation,' Engineering Structures, Vol. 21, 1999, pp. 135-148 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00154-5
  22. Zhang, W. S. and Xu, Y. L., 'Vibration analysis of two buildings linked by Maxwell Model-defined fluid dampers,' Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 233, 2000, pp. 775-796 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2735
  23. Zhu, H. P. and lemura, H, 'A study of response control on the passive coupling element between two parallel structures,' Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 9, 2000, pp. 383-396 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.9.4.383
  24. Ni, Y. Q., Ko, J. M. and Ying, Z. G., 'Random seismic response analysis of adjacent buildings coupled with non-linear hysteretic dampers,' Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 246, No.3, 2001, pp. 403-417 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3679
  25. Abdullah, M. M., Hanif, J. H., Richardson, A. and Sobanjo, J., 'Use of a shared tuned mass damper (STMD) to reduce vibration and pounding in adjacent structures,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 30, 2001, pp. 1185-1201 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.58
  26. Bhaskararao, A. V. and Jangid, R. S., 'Harmonic response of adjacent structures connected with a friction damper,' Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 292, 2006, pp. 710-725 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.08.029
  27. Klein, R. E. and Healy, M. D., 'Semi-active control of wind induced oscillations,' Proc. 2nd International Conference on Structural Control, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 15-17 July, 1985, pp. 354-369
  28. Yang, J. N., Akbarpour, A. and Ghaemmaghami, P., 'New control algorithms for structural control,' Journal of Engi-nnering Mechanics, ASCE, Vol. 113, No.9, 1987, pp. 1369-1386 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:9(1369)
  29. Mitsuta, S. and Seto, K., 'Active vibration control of structures arranged in parallel,' Proceedings of the First International Conference on Motion and Vibration Control, Japan, 1992, pp. 146-151
  30. Yamada, Y., Ikawa, N., Yokoyama, H. and Tachibana, E., 'Active control of structures using the joint member with negative stiffness,' Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Structural Control, Los Angeles, California, Vol. 2, TP2, 1994, pp. 41-49
  31. Luco, J. E. and Wong, H. G., 'Control of the seismic response of adjacent structures,' Proc. 1st World Conf. on Structural Control, Vol. 2, 3-5 August 1994, Los Angeles, CA, TA2, pp. 21-30
  32. Seto, K. and Matsumoto, Y., 'A structural vibration control method of flexible buildings in response to large earthquakes and strong winds,' Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Structural Control, Hong Kong, 1996, pp. 490-496
  33. Matsumoto, Y., Doi, F. and Seto, K., 'Vibration control of multiple building structures connected with active bridges,' Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Vol. 1, 1999, pp. 599-607
  34. Zhang, W. S. and Xu, Y. L., 'Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected by active tendon devices,' Smart Structures and Materials 1999: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Vol. 3671, 1999, pp. 217-228 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.348672
  35. Christenson, R. E., Spencer Jr., B. F., Johnson, E. A., 'Coupled building control using active and smart damping strategies,' Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Application of Artificial Intelligence to Civil and Structural Engineering, Oxford, England, September 1999
  36. Xu, Y. L. and Zhang, W. S., 'Closed-form solution for seismic response of adjacent buildings with linear quadratic Gaussian controllers,' Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 31, 2002, pp. 235-259 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.107
  37. Iwanami, K, Suzuki, K. and Seto, K., 'Studies of the vibration control method of parallel structures,' Trans. JSME, No. 86-0247A, 1986, pp. 3063-3072
  38. Kageyama, M., Yoshida, O. and Yasui, Y., 'A study on optimum damping systems for connected double frame structures,' Proceedings of the lst world Conference on Structural Control, Los Angeles, CA, Vol. 1, WP4, 1994, pp. 32-39
  39. Kageyama, M., Yasui, Y., Suzuki, T. and Seto, K., 'A study on optimum design of joint dampers connecting two towers: the case of connecting two same height towers at multiple points,' Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Structural Control, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 1463-1472
  40. Luco, J. E. and De Barros, F. C. P., 'Optimal damping between two adjacent elastic structures,' Earthquake Engi-neering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 7, No.7, 1998, pp. 649-659
  41. Chopra, A. K., Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1995, pp. 424
  42. Chen, C. T., Linear system theory and design, New York Oxford, Oxford university press, 1999, pp. 16
  43. Hurty, W. C. and Rubinstein, M. F., Dynamics of structures, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ, 1964
  44. Shinozuka, M. and Deodatis, G., 'Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation,' Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 44, No. 4, 1991, pp. 191-203 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3119501
  45. AASHTO, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges, 17th Ed, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2002

Cited by

  1. Efficient Vibration Control Approach of Two Identical Adjacent Structures vol.29, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2014.29.3.056