Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

Emotional Responses and Perceived Teaching-Learning Strategies for Effective Conceptual Change by the Types of Cognitive Responses to a Discrepant Event

변칙사례에 의한 인지적 반응 유형에 따른 정의적 반응 및 학생들이 제시하는 효과적인 개념변화 교수-학습 전략

  • Published : 2006.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, twenty-eight 7th graders were interviewed to explore their emotional responses and perceived teaching-learning strategies for effective conceptual change by the types of cognitive responses to a discrepant event. The results revealed that cognitive conflict was more induced by a discrepant event when its reliability and validity were emphasized. The students' cognitive responses to a discrepant event, the existence of alternative hypotheses, and their clearness influenced the patterns of emotional responses such as interest and anxiety. Many students perceived that emotional responses would have positive influences on concept learning processes. In the cases of the students exhibiting cognitive responses such as belief decrease, peripheral belief change, and belief change, opinions about teaching-learning strategies for effective conceptual change were different depending on whether they had alternative hypotheses or not. Educational implications are discussed.

이 연구에서는 중학교 1학년 28명을 대상으로 변칙사례에 의한 인지적 반응 유형에 따른 정의적 반응 및 학생들이 제시하는 효과적인 개념변화 교수-학습전략을 조사하기 위한 면담을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 변칙사례의 신뢰성과 타당성을 강조할 경우 인지갈등이 더 잘 유발되는 것으로 나타났다. 흥미와 불안과 같은 정의적 반응이 나타나는 양상은 인지적 반응 유형 및 대안가설의 제시 유무와 명확성에 따라 달랐으며, 정의적 반응이 개념학습 과정에 긍정적인 영향을 준다고 생각하는 학생들이 많았다. 신념감소, 주변신념변화, 신념변화 반응을 보인 학생들의 경우, 효과적인 개념변화를 위해 필요하다고 생각하는 교수-학습전략이 대안가설의 제시 유무에 따라 다르게 나타났다. 이에 대한 교육적 함의를 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강석진, 신숙희, 노태희 (2002). 밀도 개념 학습에서 자기 조절 전략과 인지 갈등 및 개념변화의 관계. 대한화학회지, 46(1), 83-89
  2. 권용주, Lawson, A. E. (1999). 과학 교수, 학습과정에서 실험활동 중심 수업의 효율성에 대한 신경학적 설명. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 29-40
  3. 권재술, 이경호, 김연수 (2003). 인지갈등과 개념변화의 필요조건과 충분조건. 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), 574-591
  4. 이용숙, 김영천 (1998) 교육에서의 질적 연구. 방법과 적용. 서울: 교육과학사
  5. 조주환, 주국영 (2001). 과학의 수준별 학습을 위한 Web 기반 수업 자료의 개발, 교과교육연구, 4(1), 227-257
  6. 최혁준, 홍윤희, 이재남, 권미랑, 서상오, 김지나, 김준태, 권재술 (2005). 과학 학습에서 학습자 성격유형과 불일치 상황 제시 방법에 따른 인지갈등 정도. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(4), 441-449
  7. Chen, Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383-400 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158578
  8. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
  9. Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
  10. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 117-159
  11. Hynd, C., Alvermann, D., & Qian, G. (1997). Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual change about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance. Science Education, 81(1), 1-27 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:1<1::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-M
  12. Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71-96 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3
  13. Kang, S., Schailllann, L. C., Noh, T., & Koh, H. (2005), The influence of students' cognitive and motivational variables on cognitive conflict and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1037-1058 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038553
  14. Keller, J. M. (1993). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Florida State University
  15. Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S.-S., Kim, J.-W., Kwon, H.-G., & Park, H.-K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary -level science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
  16. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4-5), 357-380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
  17. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientation and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_2
  18. O'Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and validity of a state metacognitive inventory: Potential for alternative assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 89(4), 234-245 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1996.9941208
  19. Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper and Row
  20. Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2001). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455
  21. Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  22. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press