Periodontal attachment loss of extracted teeth for periodontal reasons

발거치에 나타난 부착상실의 양상에 대한 연구

  • Kim, Jung-Hyun (Department of periodontology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jo (Department of periodontology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of periodontology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of periodontology, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 김중현 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.03.30

Abstract

The factors influencing long-term prognosis of teeth must be carefully considered. Among these, attachment level is strongly associated with tooth loss. The purpose of the present study was to estimate pattern of attachment loss based on attachment area in extracted teeth. 197 satisfied the criteria for assessment after staining. The protocol described by Waerhaug(l975) was performed. An indir ect method, based on digital image abstracted from digital camera and digital imaging software program, was used to calculate the root surface area and the attachment loss area. The data were analysed using SPSS. Except maxillary central incisior and mandibular canine, no statistical significant differences between each root surfaces were observed in anterior teeth. In posterior teeth, statistical significant differences in palatal surface of maxillary molar and mandibular molar compared with others were observed. Statistical significant difference in buccal surface compared with others was lowly observed in single and multi rooted. This study did not reveal progressive loss pattern of attachment area in each root surface but clarified root surface that has relative high loss rate of attachment area at extraction. Thus understanding this pattern of attachment loss is helpful for dentist to treat the periodontitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Lindhe J. Textbook of clinical perIodontology, 1st ed. Munksgaard, 1983: 298-326
  2. Martha E, Nunn ME. Understanding the etiology of periodontitis: an overview of periodontal risk factors. Periodontol 2000 2003;32:11-23 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03202.x
  3. Deas DE, Pasquali LA, Yuan CH, Kornman KS. The relationship between probing attachment loss and computerized radiographic analysis in monitoring progression of periodontitis. J Periodontol 1991;62:135-141 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.2.135
  4. Goodson JM, Tanner ACR, Haffajee AD, Sornberger GC, Socransky SS. Pattern of progression and regression of advanced destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:479-481
  5. Halazonetis TD, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Relationship of clinical parameters to attachment loss in subsets of subjects with destructive peridontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:563-568 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb02138.x
  6. Magnusson I, Listgarten MA. Histological evaluation of probing depth following periodontal treatment. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:26-31 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1980.tb01946.x
  7. Hujoel P, Bollen AM, DeRouen TA. Quantification of periodontal attachment at single-rooted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:224-228 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb01645.x
  8. Klock KS, Gjerdet NR, Haugejorden O. Periodontal attachment loss assessed by linear and area measurements in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:443-447 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00386.x
  9. Brown R. A method of measurement of root area. J Can Dent Assoc 1950; 16: 130-132
  10. Jepsen A. Root surface measurement and a method for x-ray determination of root surface area. Acta Odontol Scand 1963;21:35-46 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356309019777
  11. Hujoel P, Bollen AM, DeRouen TA. Quantification of periodontal attachment at multi-rooted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:193-196 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00638.x
  12. Verdonschot EH, Sanders AJ, Plasschaert AJ. A computer-aided image analysis system for area measurement of tooth root surfaces. J Periodontol 1990;61:275-280 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.5.275
  13. Waerhaug J. Healing of the dento-epithelial junction following subgingival plaque controll II: as observed on extracted teeth. J Periodontol 1978;49:119-134 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.3.119
  14. Saglie R, Johansen JR, Flotra L. The zone of completely and partially destructed periodontal fibers in pathological pockets. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:198-202 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01742.x
  15. Powell B, Garnick JJ. The use of extracted teeth to evaluate clinical measurements of periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1978;49:621-624 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1978.49.12.621
  16. Waerhaug J. A method for evaluation of periodontal problem on extracted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1975;2:160-168 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1975.tb01738.x
  17. Splieth C, Giesenberg J, Fanghanel J. Periodontal attachment level of extractions presumably performed for periodontal reasons. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:514-518 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2002.290607.x
  18. Klock KS, Haugejorden O. In vitro determination of the forceps level for extraction of teeth for periodontal reasons. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:155-160 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00337.x
  19. Yamamoto T, Ishikawa A, Watanabe Y, Hirano N, Shibata Y, Watanabe T. Prevalence of horizontal attachment loss in extracted teeth. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:791-795 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00556.x
  20. Okamato H, Yoneyama T, Lindhe J, Haffajee A, Socransky S. Methods of evaluating periodontal disease data in epidemiological research. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:430-439 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01597.x
  21. Gher MW, Dunlap RW. Linear variation of the root surface area of the maxillary first molar. J Periodontol 1985;56:39-43 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1985.56.1.39