DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Acoustic Amenity Factor of Urban Environmental Sound for the Ecological Soundscape

도시 환경음의 쾌적성 평가요인에 관한 연구

  • 국찬 (동신대학교 환경공학부) ;
  • 송민정 (동신대학교 공업기술연구소) ;
  • 신훈 (전남대학교 대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 장길수 (동신대학교 건축공학부)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

The assessment of an urban site depends on the way whether it responds to multiple needs such as functionality, aesthetic and complex comfort of acoustic, thermal, lighting and air quality etc. This study aims to investigate the assessment of various urban soundscapes in the sense of acoustic amenity by the questionnaires. As a result, acoustic amenity assessment was influenced by the non-acoustic factors such as environment assessment of visual, thermal, air quality etc. In the sense of sound quality, urban environmental sound was interpreted as 3 factors of strength, evolution of time, spacial localization. So these factors would be considered in the new assessment method for acoustic amenity. And it was shown that the subjects tend to perceive the noise level less than $3{\sim}5dB\;L_{eqA}$ according to the urban landscapes under the similar noise exposure level.

Keywords

References

  1. Brigitte Schultz-Fortkamp, 2003, 'Soundscape and Community Annoyance in the Context of Environmental Impact Assessment,' Proceedings of internoise2003, pp. 2815-2824
  2. Manon Raimbault, Catherine Lanvandier, Michel Berengier, 2003, 'Ambient sound assessment of urban environments : field studies in two French cities,' Applied Acoustics, 64, pp. 1241-1256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(03)00061-6
  3. Yang, W. and Kang, J. 2005, 'Acoustic Comfort Evaluation in Urban Open Public Spaces,' Applied Acoustics, 66, pp. 211-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.07.011
  4. Jose Luis Carles, Isabel Lopez Barrio, Jose Vicente de Lucio, 1999, 'Sound influence on landscape values,' Landscape and Urban Planning, 43, pp.191-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00112-1
  5. Kawai, K. and Yano, T. 2003, 'Relation between the Overall Impression of the Sound Environment and Types and Loudness of Environmental sounds,' JSV, 250 (1), pp. 41-46 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3887
  6. Greg Watts, Linda Chinn, Nigel Godfrey, 2002, 'The Effects of Vegetation on the Perception of Traffic Noise,' Applied Acoustics, 56, pp. 39-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00019-X
  7. Stephanie Viollon, Catherine Lavandier, 2002, Carolyn Drake, 'Influence of Visual Setting on Sound Ratings in an Urban Environment,' Applied Acoustics, 63, pp. 493-511 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(01)00053-6
  8. Kook, C., Lee T. G., Chon, J. H. and Jang, G. S., 2003, 'Road Traffic Noise Perception Influenced by the Visual Information,' Proceedings of internoise2003, pp. 1703- I 706
  9. Theodore J. Schultz, 1982, Community Noise Rating, Applied Science Publishers, New York, pp. 11-21
  10. Jang, G. S., Kook C. and Kim, S. W., 2003, 'The Preference and Amenity Factors of the Environmental Sounds Suitable for Urban Public Spaces,' Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol.13, No.11, pp. 890-896 https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2003.13.11.890