The Substitution Effect of Leadership Substitutes for Transformational Leadership in Nursing Organization

변혁적 리더십행위와 리더십 대체요인이 직무만족에 미치는 효과

  • Kim, Jeong-Hee (Department of Nursing, Medical School, Cheju National University)
  • 김정희 (제주대학교 의과대학 간호학과)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

Purpose: This paper was conducted to examine the effects of transformational leadership behaviors, within the substitutes for leadership model(Kerr & Jermier, 1978). Method: Data was collected from 181 staff nurses in 3 general hospitals, with self-reporting questionnaires(MLQ developed by Bass, rd-SLS developed by Podsakoff, et at., and MSQ developed by Weiss, et al.). Descriptive statistics, factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha and moderated regression analysis were used. Result: 1) The transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership each had correlations with job satisfaction. 2) The total amount of variance accounted for by the substitutes for leadership was substantially greater than by the transformational leadership behaviors. 3) Few of the substitutes variables moderated the relationships between the transformational leader behaviors and job satisfaction in a manner consistent with that specified by Howell, Dorfman, and Kerr(1986). Conclusion: The finding of this study suggest that leaders need to have a better understanding of those contextual variables that influence job satisfaction. Thus future research should focus attention on the moderating effects of substitutes, as well as the things that leaders can do to influence them. In addition, it may be good to examine the effects of substitutes on other criterion variables.

Keywords

References

  1. An, S. R. (2000). The effects of transactional and transformational leadership affecting job satisfaction and situational factors. Unpublished Master Thesis, Chonnam National University, Kwangju
  2. Baek, G. B. (1996). Organizational behavior research. Seoul: ChangMinSa
  3. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, New York: The Free Press
  4. Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Atwater, L. E., & James, L. R. (2002). Neutralizing substitutes for leadership theory: leadership effects and common-source bias, J Applied Psychol, 87(3), 454-464 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.454
  5. Ha, N. S., & Choi, J. (2002). The relatonship among leadership styles of nurse organizational commitment, and turnover intention, J Korean Acad Nurs, 32(6), 812-822 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2002.32.6.812
  6. Choi, J. Y. (2000). Relationship between nurisng organizational climate and job satisfaction of nurses in general hospitals, JKANA, 6(2), 227-244
  7. Howell, J. P. (1997). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement-an historical assessment. Leadersh Q, 8(2), 113-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90011-4
  8. Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (1981). Substitutes for leadership: test of a construct. Acad Manag J, 24, 714-728 https://doi.org/10.2307/256171
  9. Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (1986). Leadership and substitutes for leadership among professional and nonprofessional workers, J Appl Behav Sci, 22, 29-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200106
  10. Jemier, J. M., & Kerr, S. (1997). 'Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement' -contetual recollections and current observations, Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 95-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90008-4
  11. Jeong, J. W. (1992). The study on a model setting to analyze the impacts of substitutes for leadership. Korean Assoc Public Adm, 26(2), 407-429
  12. Kang, K. H., & Kim, J. H. (2000). The relationship between the head nurses' leadership style and the autonomy perceived by nurses. JKANA, 6(2), 281-290
  13. Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: their meaning and measurement, Organ Behav Hum Perform, 22, 375-403 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
  14. Kim, I. S., Lee, M. H., Ha, N. S., Jang, K. S., Hong, Y. M., Lee, T. W., & Kang, S. J. (2003). New-Nursing Management, Seoul: HyunMoonSa
  15. Kim, J. H. (2005). Testing reliability and validity of reduced substitutes for leadership scales(rd-SLS), J Korean Acad Nurs, 35(6), 1072-1080 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2005.35.6.1072
  16. Kim, J. H., & Park, S. A. (2002). The relationship between coping strategies and a nursing organizational effectiveness in staff nurses, JKANA, 8(1), 97-105
  17. Kim, Y. S. (2004). A study on the substitute leadership theory, Unpublished master dissertation, Dong Eui University, Busan
  18. Lee, S. K. (2003). A study on the substitution effect of leadership substitutes for transformational leadership. Food and Beverage serv manag Res, 6(3), 29-43
  19. Mattner, K. M. (1991). Facing the productivity issues: Threat or opportunity-, Nursing Management, 22(7), 104B-104H https://doi.org/10.1097/00006247-199107000-00021
  20. Park, H. T. (1997). Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles of the Nurse Administrators and Job Satisfaction , Organizational Commitment in Nursing Service, J Korean Acad Nurs, 27(1), 228-241
  21. Park, Y. J., Lee, S. J., Chang, S. O., Youn, J. J., & Lee, J. K. (1997). Study on the effectiveness of nursing organization of one tertiary hospital, JKANA, 3(2), 109-122
  22. Park, Y. J., Lee, S. J., Lee, J. K., & Jang, S. O. (1997). The Effectiveness of Nursing Organization, J Korean Acad Nurs, 27(1), 189-201
  23. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996a). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance, J Appl Psychol, 81(4), 380-399 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.380
  24. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996b). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisafction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors, J Manag, 22(2), 259-298 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(96)90049-5
  25. Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Kerr and Jermier's substitutes for leadership model: background, empirical assessment, and suggestions for future research. Leadersh Q, 8(2), 117-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(97)90012-6
  26. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Fetter, R. (1993). Substitutes for leadership and the management of professionals, Leadersh Q, 4(1), 1-44 https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(93)90002-B
  27. Podsakoff, P. M., Niehoff, B. P., MacKenzie, S. B., & Williams, M. L. (1993). Do substitutes for leadership really substitutee for leadership? an empirical examination of Kerr and Jermier's Situational Leadership Model, Organ Behav Hum Decis Process, 54, 1-44 https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1001
  28. Pool, S. W. (1997). The relationship of job satisfaction with substitutes of leadership, leadership behavior, and work motivation, The J Psychol, 131(3), 271-283 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989709603514
  29. Sheridan, J. E., Vrenburgh, D. J., & Abelson, M. A. (1984). Contextual model of leadership influence in hospital units, Acad Manag J, 27(1), 57-78 https://doi.org/10.2307/255957
  30. Shin, Y. J., & Lee, B. S. (2000). The influence of leadership of head nurses on job satisfaction and job performance of staff nurses, JKANA, 6(3), 405-419