Analysis of Soil Erodibility Potential Depending on Soil and Topographic Condition - A Case Study of Ibang-myeon, Changnyeong-gun, Kyungsangnam-do, South Korea-

토양 및 지형 조건에 따른 토양침식 잠재성 분석 - 경상남도 창녕군 이방면을 대상으로 -

  • Park, In-Hwan (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Coll. of Agr. & Life, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jang, Gab-Sue (Dept. of Environmental and Ecological Research, Chungnam Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Geun-Sang (Institute of Water and Environment, Korea Water Resources Corporation) ;
  • Seo, Dong-Jo (Dept. of Computer Engineering, Seoul Digital University)
  • 박인환 (경북대학교 농업생명과학대학 조경학과) ;
  • 장갑수 (충남발전연구원 환경생태연구부) ;
  • 이근상 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원) ;
  • 서동조 (서울디지털대학교 컴퓨터공학부)
  • Received : 2005.11.09
  • Accepted : 2005.12.27
  • Published : 2006.02.28

Abstract

Changes in the soil physical property and the topographic condition derived from agricultural activities like as farming activities, land clearance and cutting down resulted in environmental and economic problems including the outflow of nutrient from farms and the water pollution. Several theories on the soil conservation have been developed and reviewed to protect soil erosion in the regions having a high risk of erosion. This study was done using the USLE model developed by Wischmeier and Smith (1978), and model for the slope length and steepness made by Desmet and Govers (1996), and Nearing (1997) to evaluate the potential of the soil erodibility. Therefore, several results were obtained as follows. First, factors affecting the soil erosion based on the USLE could be extracted to examine the erosion potential in farms. Soil erodibility (K), slope length (L), and slope steepness (S) were used as main factors in the USLE in consideration of the soil, not by the land use or land cover. Second, the soil erodibility increased in paddy soils where it is low in soil content, and the very fine sandy loam exists. Analysis of the slope length showed that the value of a flat ground was 1, and the maximum value was 9.17 appearing on the steep mountain. Soil erodibility showed positive relationship to a slope. Third, the potential soil erodibility index (PSEI) showed that it is high in the PSEI of the areas of steep upland and orchard on the slope of mountainous region around Dokjigol mountain, Dunji mountain, and Deummit mountain. And the PSEI in the same land cover was different depending on the slope rather than on the physical properties in soil. Forth, the analysis of land suitability in soil erosion explained that study area had 3,672.35ha showing the suitable land, 390.88ha for the proper land, and 216.54ha for the unsuitable land. For unsuitable land, 8.71ha and 6.29ha were shown in fallow uplands and single cropping uplands, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. 이근상, 이환주, 임승현, 조기성, 2001, GSIS를 활용한 토양침식모형에서 지형인자의 영향분석, 대한토목학회논문집, 21(4D), 545-554
  2. 이환주, 김환기(2001), GSIS 공간분석을 활용한 토양침식모형의 입력인자 추출에 관한 연구, 한국측량학회지, 19(1), 27-37
  3. 장영률, 이근상, 조기성, 2002, GIS 기반에서 토양 침식의 정량화를 위한 해상도 결정에 관한 연구, 한국GIS학회지, 10(2), 301-316
  4. 정강호, 김원태, 허승오, 하상건, 정필균, 정영상, 2004, 수치 정밀토양도에 기초한 전국 토양 유실량의 평가를 위한 USLE/RUSLE 인자의 산정, 한국토양비료학회, 37(4), 199-206
  5. 정영상, 권영기, 임형식, 하상건, 양재의, 1999, 강원도 경사지 토양유실 예측용 신USLE의 적용을 위한 강수인자와 토양침식성 인자의 검토, 한국토양비료학회지, 32(1), 31-38
  6. 정필균, 1983, 토양유실량 예측을 위한 강우인자의 분석, 한국토양비료학회지, 16(2), 112-118
  7. 정필균, 2002, 경사지 침식방지 대책, 경사지 토양 보전 및 관리대책 심포지움, 농업과학기술원: pp. 103-113
  8. 창녕군, 2002, 창녕군 통계연보
  9. 최진규, 구자웅, 손재권, 1998, 토양유실량예측공식 USLE 적용과 단위변환, 한국토양비료학회지 31(3): 301-308
  10. 현병근, 김무성, 엄기철, 강기경, 윤홍배, 서명철, 성기석, 2002, USLE 모형과 대체법을 이용한 밭농사의 토양유실 저감기능 계량화 평가, 한국토양비료학회, 35(6), 361-371
  11. Bartsch, K. P., 1998, Modeling soil loss to determine water erosion risk at Camp Williams national guard base', UTAH, UTAH state university, 1-57
  12. Box, Jr. J. E. 1981, The effect of surface slaty fragment on soil erosionby water. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 43, 111-116
  13. Desmet, P. J. J. and G. Govers, 1996, A GIS-prodedure for the automated calculation of the USLE LS-factor on topographically complex landscape units, Journal of soil and water conservation, 51(5), 427-433
  14. Hudson, N., 1997, Soil conservation, Cornell university press, 320-325
  15. Nearing, M. A., 1997, A single continuous function for slope steepness influence on soil loss, Soil science society of America journal 61, 917-919 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030029x
  16. Wischmeier, W. H. and D. D. Smith, 1978, Predicting rainfall erosion losses - a guide to conservation planning, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 537