The Stream Restoration Program Evaluation Issue

하천복원사업 평가기준의 과제

  • Received : 2005.07.07
  • Accepted : 2006.02.10
  • Published : 2006.02.28

Abstract

The Korean government adopted the integrated stream water management policy recently with growing perception that natural disasters and pollution in Korea have been due not only to such human factors as urbanization and industrialization, but also to the policy of functionally separated management of irrigation, flood control and ecological management. Contrary to its good intention, research result shows that it is not realistic to expect that this new integrated policy in Korea will work well. In order to be an effective policy and program evaluation, this paper suggests that evaluation indicator on related programs and projects should be made through bottom-up process. For example, environmental benefit should be taken into account rather than just economic benefit, and cultural and social characteristics in the project region should be also considered seriously.

Keywords

References

  1. 감사원, 2003, 팔당상수원 보전지역 관리실태 감사결과
  2. 대한민국정부, 2004, 2004-2008국가재정운용계획
  3. 최미희, 2004a, 환경분야 물부문 중기재정소요분석보고서, 국회예산정책처
  4. 최미희, 2004b, '한강수계 수질관리사업의 평가와 과제,' 국가주요사업.정책보고서, 국회예산정책처
  5. 최미희, 허은녕, 2003, 11, 범람원(홍수터) 복원 정책에 있어서 불확실성하의 의사결정 - 다기준 통합모형의 유용성, 한국자원경제학회 추계학술대회
  6. 최형지, 댐 주변 지역 주민들의 댐 반대 이슈에 관한 연구, 2003, 10. 27, 근대화와 물의 변화 - 한국과 일본의 사례, 2002년 한국학술진흥재단 기초학문육성지원사업 인문사회분야 일반연구 '한일 공동 국제학술세미나'
  7. 환경부, 2004a, 2005예산안 주요사업 설명자료, 2004. 9
  8. 환경부, 2004b, 자연형하천복원사업 우수사례집
  9. 지방의제21전국협의회, 2004, 지속가능한 지역발전을 위한 환경거버넌스 구축방안연구, 환경부
  10. M. Acreman, S. Crook et al. 2002, Hydrological Impact Assessment: Modelling the Impacts of Floodplain restoration. The Royal Society for the Protectionof Birds
  11. Bateman, I.J. 1999, 'Environmental impact assessment, cost-benefit analysis and the valuation of environmental impacts', in J. Petts, Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, volume 1-environmental impact assessment process, methods and potential. Oxford: Blackwell Science
  12. Beierle, Thomas C. 2000, 'The Quality of Stakeholder-Based Decisions: Lessons from the Case Study Record', RRF Discussion Paper 00-56
  13. Brouwer et. 2002, Living with floods: An integrated assessment f land use changes and floodplain restoration as alternative flood protection measures in the Netherlands, National Institute for Integrated Inland Water Management and Wastewater Treatment(RIZA)
  14. Burgess et. 2000, Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme, Ecological Economics 35, 119-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00172-5
  15. O. Bystrom, 1998, The Replacement Value of Wetlands in Sweden, Environmental and Resource Economics
  16. Dixon, J.A. et al, 1988, Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Development Projects, Earthscan, London
  17. English et al, 1993, 'Stakeholder Involvement: Open Processes For Reaching Decisions About The Future Uses Of Contaminated Sites', Working Paper, Waste Management Research and Education Institute, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  18. Gayatri Acharya, 2000, Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems, Ecological Economics
  19. Kaplowitz et., 2001, Do focus groups and individual interviews reveal the same information for natural resource valuation?, Ecological Economics 36, 237-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00226-3
  20. Navrud, S. (2000) 'Strengths, weaknesses and policy utility of valuation techniques and benefit transfer', Invited Paper for the OECD-USDA workshop The Value of Rural Amenities: Dealing with Public Goods, Non-Market Goods and Externalities, Washington, D.C., June 5-6, 2000
  21. Renn, O., T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann. 1995. The pursuit of fair and competent citizen participation. In Renn, O, et al. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Boston: Klewer Academic, 339-368
  22. Tickner, Joel and Lee Ketelsen (2001) Democracy and The Precautionary Principle, The Networker, 6