KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study for Benefit Calculation of Bicycle Roadway Construction using Contingent Valuation Method

조건부 가치측정법(CVM)을 이용한 자전거도로 건설에 따른 편익 산출에 관한 연구

  • 권용석 (전주대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 이진각 (명지대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 손영태 (명지대학교 교통공학과)
  • Received : 2006.09.11
  • Accepted : 2006.10.30
  • Published : 2006.11.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In implementing transportation projects, benefits have been estimated using conventional benefit components. However, these components have a lot of assumptions and limitations for benefit estimations and thus it seems to be difficult to obtain values of parameters as well as to overlook benefits of non-market goods in calculation process. In other words, current benefit estimations are considered that can be solely measured by directly depending on traffic volumes. Existing economic analysis do not reflect the full benefits, including direct and indirect of the project implementations. To illustrate this fact, bicycle road construction can result in various functional benefits, including improved quality of life, balanced regional development, and good scenery composition. These benefits can not be explained with conventional economic analysis. The objective of this research is to estimate valuation of bicycle road construction using Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). CVM can evaluate user's direct willingness-to-pay as well as maximize bicycle utilization with balanced regional development. This research used the coastline bicycle road construction project for example. The proposed method can be well calculated or estimated benefits for non-market goods of bicycle road constructions using CVM.

자전거 도로 건설 같이 공공사업 성격이 강한 경우, 생활환경개선, 지역균형발전, 양호한 경관형성 등 다양한 도로기능 편익을 지니고 있는데 이들 항목은 기존 경제성 분석의 경우에서는 간과되는 측면이 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 비시장재 가치를 평가하기 위하여 환경경제 분야에서 많이 적용하고 있는 조건부가치측정법(CVM : Contingent Valuation Method; 이하 CVM)을 이용하여, 실제로 자전거도로가 건설(해안선 자전거 일주 도로 건설의 예)됨으로써 발생하게 될 지역균형 발전 및 자전거 이용활성화를 고려하여, 시민들에게 직접 설문조사(전국 256가구)를 수행하고, CVM 방법론에 따른 지불의사액(Willing to Pay : WTP) 및 편익을 추정하였다. 그 결과 평균 WTP는 최소 2,114원 정도로 나타났다. 향후, 이러한 CVM 기법은 기존 경제성 분석을 활용한 편익 산출로는 한계가 있는 도로 건설 분야 중 도로교 건설에 따른 경관평가, 환경 개선에 따른 편익, 삶의 질 향상 등에 널리 활용될 수 있으리라 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 고은미(1999) CVM에 의한 급행전철도입으로 인한 편익추정에 관한 연구
  2. 이병주 외 3인(2005) CVM을 이용한 관광지 접근도로 신설에 따른 편익추정
  3. 한국개발연구원(2004) 문화.과학시설의 가치추정 연구
  4. Betz, C., Bergstrom, J., and Bowker, J. M. (2003) A contingent trip model for estimating rail-trail demand. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 79-96 https://doi.org/10.1080/713676704
  5. Fix, P. and Loomis, J. (1998) Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed and stated preference. In Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, No, 41, pp. 227-236
  6. Harrison, G. W. and Kristrom, B. (1995) On the Interpretation of Response to Contingent Valuation Survey. Manchester University Press
  7. Lindsey, G. and Knaap, G. (1999) Willingness to pay for urban greenway projects. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 297-301 https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369908976059
  8. Litman, T. (2004) Economic value of walkability. World Transport Policy & Practice, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 5-14
  9. Michael Hanemann W. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete-response, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 66, pp. 332-341 https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  10. Michael Hanemann W. (1989) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response: reply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 71, pp. 1057-1061 https://doi.org/10.2307/1242685
  11. NCHRP 7-14 (2005) Guidelines for Analysis of Investments in Bicycle Facilities, TRB
  12. Nelson, A.C. and Allen, D.P. (1997) If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them, Transportation Research Record, 1578, pp. 79-83
  13. Sharples, R. (1995) A Framework for the evaluation of facilities for cyclists-Part 1. Traffic Engineering and Control, pp. 142-149