Research Trend of Complementary and Alternative Medicine

보완대체요법의 국내외 연구 동향 비교

  • Published : 2006.08.01

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to describe the research trend of Complementary and Alternative Medicine(CAM) in Korea and internationally. Method: A Systematic review of CAM related literature published from 2000 to 2005 was done. A comprehensive search by using 34 CAM modalities as search terms to identify all articles dealing with CAM was undertaken from 4 databases: PubMed, RICHIS, KoreaMed, and Riss4U. A Total of 588 abstracts and 223 original articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers using systematic analysis guidelines. Data regarding the types of study design, characteristics of subjects and researchers, and classification of CAM modalities was recorded. The outcome measures of CAM were identified. Results: CAM research has been rapidly increasing worldwide in the last decade. In Korea, nursing(53.5%) followed by medicine(42.7%) occupied the majority of CAM research in comparison to medicine(42.9%) and disciplines in CAM(25.0%), like homeopathy, internationally. Prevailing research designs in Korea were experimental and quasi-experimental, however, randomized clinical trials were found. Internationally, survey research was dominant, with the exception of randomized clinical trials that were mostly an experimental design. Conclusion: The findings suggest that a robust research design in CAM research is needed to accumulate strong scientific evidence and to adopt nursing interventions from CAM modalities.

Keywords

References

  1. Chun, S. I. (2004). Complementary alternative medicine. Seoul : Gyechuk Publishing Company
  2. Eisenberg, D. M., Davis, R. B., & Ettner, S. J. (1998). Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997. JAMA, 280, 15-69 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.23.1990
  3. Jadud, A. R., Moor, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C. J., Reynolds, D. J., Gavaghan, D. J., & McQuay H. J. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials : is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials, 17, 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
  4. Jang, E. H., & Park, K. S. (2003). A comparative study of nurses' and physicians' attitudes about complementary and alternative therapy. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs, 15(3), 402-410
  5. Kim, M. H.(2003). Use of complementary and alternative medicine and its related factors in cancer patients. Unpublished master's thesis, Yeungnam University, Deagu
  6. Klaus, L. Wayne, B. J., Dieter, M., & Stefan, W. (2001). The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture. Int J Epidemiol, 30, 526-531 https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/30.3.526
  7. Korean Medical Association. Development and application of evidence level for complementary therapy-Summary (2005). Seoul, Korean Medical Association
  8. Lee, E. I., Shin, Y. C., Lee, J. Y., Kim, S. D., Kim, H. J., & Cho, M. S. (2002). Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients at 7 general hospitals in Seoul. J Korean Public Health Assoc, 28(3), 225-238
  9. Menniti-Ippolito, F., Gargiulo, L., Bologna, E., Forcella, E., & Raschetti, R. (2002). Use of unconventional medicine in Italy : A nation wide survey. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 58, 61-64 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-002-0435-8
  10. NCCAM (National Center of Complementary Alternative Medicine). What is Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM)? Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://nccam.nih.gov /health/w hatiscam/
  11. Ni, H., Simile, C., & Hardy, A. M. (2002). Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine by United States adults. Med Care, 40, 353-358 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200204000-00011
  12. Pitter, M. H., Abbot, N. C., Harkness, E. F., & Ernst, E. (2000). Location bias in controlled clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies. J Clin Epidemiol, 53, 485-489 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00220-6
  13. Raschetti, R., Menniti-Ippolito, F., Forcella, E., & Bianchi, C. (2005). Complementary and alternative medicine in the scientific literature. J Altern Complement Med, 11(1), 209-212 https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.209
  14. Seol, K. L., Choi, S. Y., & Jong, I. L. (2002). A study on the use, understanding and satisfaction with alternative therapy for hospitalized cancer patients. J Korean Public Health Assoc, 28(2), 198-211
  15. Son, H. M. (2002). Nurses' attitudes toward complementary and alternative therapies. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs, 14(1), 62-72
  16. Tang, J. L., Zhan, S. Y., & Ernst, E. (1999). Review of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. BMJ, 319, 160-161 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7203.160
  17. Vincent, C., & Furnham, A. (1996). Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? Br J Clin Psychol, 35, 49-61 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01161.x
  18. Yang, N. Y., & Shin, K. R. (2003). The analysis of research trend about complementary and alternative therapy (CAT) in nursing of Korea. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs, 15(6), 226-235