Improved Production of Live Cells of Lactobacillus rhamnosus by Continuous Cultivation using Glucose-yeast Extract Medium

  • Ling Liew Siew (Laboratory of Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Mohamad Rosfarizan (Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Rahim Raha Abdul (Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Wan Ho Yin (Laboratory of Enzyme and Microbial Technology, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia) ;
  • Ariff Arbakariya Bin (Department of Bioprocess Technology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia)
  • Published : 2006.08.01

Abstract

In this study, the growth kinetics of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and lactic acid production in continuous culture were assessed at a range of dilution rates $(0.05 h^{-1}\;to\;0.40h^{-1})$ using a 2L stirred tank fermenter with a working volume of 600ml. Unstructured models, predicated on the Monod and Luedeking-Piret equations, were employed to simulate the growth of the bacterium, glucose consumption, and lactic acid production at different dilution rates in continuous cultures. The maximum specific growth rate of L. rhamnosus, ${\mu}_{max}$, was estimated at $0.40h^{-1}$I, and the Monod cell growth saturation constant, Ks, at approximately 0.25g/L. Maximum cell viability $(1.3{\times}10^{10}CFU/ml)$ was achieved in the dilution rate range of $D=0.28h^{-1}\;to\;0.35h^{-1}$. Both maximum viable cell yield and productivity were achieved at $D=0.35h^{-1}$. The continuous cultivation of L. rhamnosus at $D=0.35h^{-1}$ resulted in substantial improvements in cell productivity, of 267% (viable cell count) that achieved via batch cultivation.

Keywords

References

  1. Barreto, M.T.O., E.P. Melo, J.S. Almeida, A.M.R.B. Xavier, and M.J.T. Carrondo. 1991. A kinetic method for calculating the viability of lactic starter cultures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34, 648-652 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167916
  2. Berry, A.R., C.M.M. Franco, W. Zhang, and A.P.J. Middleberg. 1999. Growth and lactic acid production in batch culture of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in a defined medium. Biotechnol. Lett. 21, 163-167 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005483609065
  3. Boonmee, M., N. Leksawasdi, W. Bridge, and P.L. Rogers. 2003. Batch and continuous culture of Lactococcus lactis NZ133: experimental data and model development. Biochem. Eng. J. 14, 127-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-703X(02)00171-7
  4. Goksungur, Y. and U. Guvenc. 1997. Batch and continuous production of lactic acid from beet molasses by Lactobacillus delbrueckii IFO 3202. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 69, 399-404 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199708)69:4<399::AID-JCTB728>3.0.CO;2-Q
  5. Goncalves, L.M.D., A.M.R.B. Xavier, J.S. Almeida, and M.J.T. Carrondo. 1991. Concomitant substrate and product inhibition kinetics in lactic acid production. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 13, 314-319 https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(91)90150-9
  6. Liew, S.L., A.B. Ariff, A.R. Raha, and H.W. Ho. 2005. Optimization of medium composition for the production of a probiotic microorganism, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, using response surface methodology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 102, 137-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.009
  7. Major, N.C. and A.T. Bull. 1989. Lactic acid productivity of a continuous culture of Lactobacillus delbrueckii. Biotechnol. Lett. 6, 401-415
  8. Mason, C.A., G. Hamer, and J. D. Bryers. 1986. The death and lysis of microorganisms in environmental processes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 373-401 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1986.tb01867.x
  9. Maxon, W.D. 1955. Continuous fermentation: A discussion of its principles and applications. Appl. Microbiol. 3, 110-122
  10. McCaskey, T.A., S.D. Zhou, S.N. Britt, and R. Strickland. 1994. Bioconversion of municipal solid waste to lactic acid by Lactobacillus species. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 45-46, 555-563
  11. Monroy, M.R. and M. de la Torre. 1996. Effect of the dilution rate on the biomass yield of Bacillus thuringiensis and determination of its rate coefficients under steady-state conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 546-550
  12. Saito, H., T. Watanabe, O. Tado. 1980. Protective effects of lactobacilli on experimental Escherichia coli infection. Med. Biol. 101, 61-64
  13. SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS/GRAPH user's guide, release 6.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C
  14. Schillinger, U. 1999. Isolation and identification of lactobacilli from novel-type probiotic and mild youghurts and their stability during refrigerated storage. Int. J Food Microbiol. 47, 79-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00014-8
  15. Sinclair, C.G. and H.H. Topiwala. 1970. Model for continuous culture which considers the viability concept. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 12, 1069-1079 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260120612
  16. Velraeds, M.M.C., B. van der Belt-Gritter, H.J. Busscher, G. Reid, and H.C. van der Mei. 2000. Inhibition of uropathogenic biofilm growth on silicone rubber in human urine by lactobacilli-teleogic approach. World J. Urology 18, 422-426 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007084
  17. Williamson, K.J. 1975. Rapid measurement of Monod half-velocity coefficients for bacterial kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17, 915-924 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260170610